293 research outputs found

    Brief von Ian Steedman an Josef Steindl

    No full text
    BRIEF VON IAN STEEDMAN AN JOSEF STEINDL Brief von Ian Steedman an Josef Steindl ([1]

    Symposium on Arrigo Opocher and Ian Steedman (2015), Full Industry Equilibrium. A Theory of the Industrial Long Run, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    No full text
    After an editorial that motivates the symposium on the book by Arrigo Opocher and Ian Steedman, there are comments by five scholars (in alphabetical order). These deal with capital theoretic issues (Bellino), the labour demand curve (Bidard), the zero-excess-profit position in alternative theories of value (Fratini), the role of intermediate as opposed to final products in the setting of prices (Harcourt) and the role of time in the analysis (Yoshihara). Then follows a response by Opocher and Steedman

    Steedman (Ian) - Marx after Sraffa.

    No full text
    Abraham-Frois Gilbert. Steedman (Ian) - Marx after Sraffa.. In: Revue économique, volume 30, n°3, 1979. p. 555

    Apprenticeship policy in England: increasing skills versus boosting young people’s job prospects.

    No full text
    Successive British governments have committed substantial public resources to apprentice training, but far too few young people benefit and not enough high value skills have been developed. That is the central conclusion of a new report published by the Centre for Economic Performance (CEP). The report’s author, Dr Hilary Steedman, who has nearly 30 years of research experience in this field, calls for a change in the country’s apprenticeship model.

    Economic Theory and Economic Thought: Essays in honour of Ian Steedman

    No full text
    Ian Steedman is recognised internationally as one of the leading economic theorists of his time and has made major contributions to the development of economic theory and economic thought, as substantiated by his work on Marx, Sraffa, Marshall, Jevons and Wicksteed. His contributions to economic theory include his work on time, international trade, capital theory and growth and distribution. This collection reflects the wide ranging interests of Ian Steedman and is a tribute to his outstanding contributions. This edited collection brings together twenty two new essays by distinguished economists from around the world. The papers cover a wide range of topics including; international trade - an area in which Steedman has made significant contributions; Sraffa, the history of economic thought and theoretical papers - including Faustian Agents and market failure in waste production. The essays in this book will be an invaluable source for economists interested in economic theory or in the evolution of economic thought. It will also be of interest to postgraduate and research students in economic theory and the history of economic thought. John Vint is Professor of Economics at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. J. Stanley Metcalfe is Professor of Economics at the University of Manchester, UK. Heinz D. Kurz is Professor of Economics at the University of Graz, Austria. Neri Salvadori is Professor of Economics at the University of Pisa, Italy. Paul Samuelson is Professor of Economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

    Input price--input quantity relations and the numéraire

    No full text
    The fact that a competitive agent faces 'given' input prices does not necessarily mean that these prices can be completely arbitrary, especially in the long run. An obvious case, but not the only one, is when there are input--output relations among industries. But as soon as long-run input price interrelatedness is taken seriously, the very conception of a downward sloping input demand curve encounters serious difficulties. Although one can always draw an input price--input quantity relation, its main qualitative property--the sign of its slope--is not generally independent of the arbitrary choice of numéraire. Copyright The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

    Ian Steedman et les néo-ricardiens : Un commentaire.

    No full text
    This comment on lan Steedman's account of the neo-Ricardian research program contains three observations. The difference in kind between negative contributions of that program (demonstrations) and its positive ones (areas) casts some doubt about the theoretical framework adopted in common. The difference in treatment between the uncomplete positive contributions (which aim at some autonomy of the neo-Ricardian approach) and the already robust ones (presented as technical achievements) suggests some uncertainty about the specificity of that research program. Finally, the restriction of lacunae to applied economics and the ambiguous classification of accumulation do not allow to contrast the field of Sraffian theory with those of Walrasian and Ricardian ones.Ce commentaire sur le bilan tiré par lan Steedman du programme de recherches néo-ricardien comporte trois observations. La différence de nature entre les contributions négatives de ce programme (des résultats) et ses contributions positives (des domaines) révèle un doute quant à la construction théorique revendiquée en commun. La différence de traitement entre les contributions positives inachevées,, (engageant Y autonomie de l'approche néo-ricardienne) et celles qui sont déjà robustes (présentées sous leur aspect technique) suggère une incertitude quant à la spécificité de ce programme de recherches. Enfin, le repérage de lacunes dans le seul champ de l'économie appliquée et l'ambiguïté avec laquelle est localisée l'accumulation dans ce bilan ne permettent pas de situer le champ de la théorie sraffienne par rapport à ceux des théories walrasienne et ricardienne.Deleplace Ghislain. Ian Steedman et les néo-ricardiens : Un commentaire.. In: Cahiers d'économie politique, n°22, 1993. Actualité et spécificité de la pensée classique, sous la direction de Christian Bidard et Christian Tutin. pp. 21-24
    corecore