1,720,962 research outputs found
Clinical Prognosticators in Patients Treated with CDK 4/6 Inhibitors for Hormone Receptors Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors are the new standard of care in hormonal receptors positive (HR+) advanced
breast cancer (ABC). Phase III trials demonstrated an improvement in survival outcomes in patients with combined
endocrine approach compared to endocrine therapy (ET) alone. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess
prognostic factors for clinical response to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Methods: All patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors from September 2016 to July 2019 were registered in a database.
Data on tumor and patient’s characteristics as well as concomitant medications were collected. Survival data were
analyzed by Kaplan Meier curves and log rank test. Treatment toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v5. A
drug-drug interactions analysis among CDK 4/6 inhibitors and co-administered medications was performed too.
Results: 121 patients were included in the study: 49% of patients treated in 1st -line, 25% in 2nd -line and 26%
in 3rd –or further lines. 1st-line objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 56% and 68%,
compared to 40% and 50% in 2nd-line and 31% and 47% in heavily pre-treated patients, respectively. Median PFS
according to line setting was: not reached in 1st-line, 17 months (95% CI 13-21) in 2nd-line and 7 months (95% CI
4-12) in 3rd or further lines. Negative prognostic factors in term of PFS were: previous chemotherapy for metastatic
disease (p=0.0001), visceral metastatic sites (p=0.002) and endocrine sensitivity (p=0.001). No association among
concomitant drugs administered and survival outcome was found. 94% of patients experienced neutropenia (G3-G4
60%) with 3% of febrile neutropenia. 71% of patients treated with Abemaciclib had diarrhea. Management of AE
included 63% of treatment delay, 44% of 1st dose reduction and 15% of 2nd dose reduction, all due to neutropenia.
No treatment discontinuation due to any toxicity was observed.
Conclusion: Data on efficacy and safety profile of CDK 4/6 inhibitors administered outside the context of a clinical
trial are consistent with those reported in Phase III trials. Previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease, visceral
metastatic site as well as previous endocrine sensitivity negatively affect CDK 4/6 inhibitors efficacy. Concomitant
medications did not affect survival outcome or safety profile
Impact of body composition parameters on tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients.
Fat tissue promotes cancer progression by increasing cell proliferation, cell survival and metastatic processes. Adipose tissue determines a dysregulation of several metabolic pathways by a continuous crosstalk between fat tissue and cancer cells. Moreover, influence of adipose tissue on cancer development depend on the type of fat too
BMI cannot account for differences in fat distribution and cannot distinguish between adipose tissue and muscles
Computed tomography (CT) imaging can be a useful tool for a directly measure of body fat distribution distinguishing among visceral, subcutaneous, internal fat tissue (mostly in the liver) and skeletal muscles mass.
Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early BC at the Modena Cancer Center from 2005 to 2017 we collected.
According to BMI score, patients were categorized in two main classes: normal weight (BMI < 25) and overweight (BMI ≥ 25) (Table 1)
Using Advance workstation (General Electric), software ADW server 3.2 or 4.7. we calculated body composition parameters (BCPs) from pre-treated CT scan images. BCPs considered are: subcutaneous fat area (SFA, cm2), visceral fat area (VFA, cm2), lumbar muscle cross-sectional area (LMCA, m2) and liver steatosis (L/S ratio)
BMI score and BCPs value were correlated with pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes. All analyses were performed using STATA 14 (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).
pre-treatment CT scan imagine available for BCPs analysis
55% of the women had BMI < 25 versus 45% with BMI >25
Overweight was significantly associated with postmenopausal status, older age and hormonal receptor positive BC (Table 1)
Menopausal status was associated with higher VFA, presence of fatty liver disease and obesity disease compared to pre-menopausal one (Table 2).
No association between BMI classes and pCR was detected. High VFA and liver steatosis were negative predictive factors for pCR (pCR rate: 35% normal VFA vs 20% high VFA, no steatosis 32% vs steatosis 13%; p<0.05) ( Figure 1)
Neither BMI classes nor BCPs significantly influenced overall survival and relapse free survival.
The evaluation of BCPs is the best way to assess the real body composition
Menopausal status is associated with higher VFA, presence of fatty liver disease and obesity disease
Visceral adiposity as well as liver steatosis were negative predictive factors for pCR in BC patients treated with neoadijuvant chemotherapy
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
