9 research outputs found
GIOCHI DI FRATELLI, GIOCHI DI FAMIGLIA
No full textLe ricerche che osservano l’intera famiglia, comprendendo tutti i figli, sono ancora poco numerose. Le modalità attraverso cui la qualità dell'interazione dei signoli sottosistemi influenza ed è influenzata dall'interazione degli altri sottosistemi e dell'intera famiglia sono raramente oggetto di studio. L'esclusione delle fratrie dalle ricerche coincide in ambito clinico con la frequente esclusione dalle stanze di terapia, dove raramente vengono convocati i fratelli di bambini che mostrano disagio psicologico. La presente tesi ha l’obiettivo di indagare come la presenza di più figli possa influenzare le capacità di coordinazione della famiglia e, in maniera circolare, come le dinamiche familiari possano influenzare l’interazione fraterna. La tesi presenta la costruzione e validazione di una griglia di osservazione dell’interazione fraterna nel contesto di un gioco strutturato della famiglia. Successivamente vengono confrontati due campioni di famiglie(15 cliniche e 15 volontarie)con due figli in età scolare rispetto a: relazione fraterna, sia osservata nel gioco familiare, che percepita dai protagonisti,qualità della coordinazione familiare, comportamento genitoriale differenziale e adattamento dei bambini. Si evidenziano differenze significative tra i due campioni rispetto alla funzionalità di tutte le dimensioni osservate e si ipotizzano modalità differenti di contagio funzionale tra sottosistemi
I Disturbi dello Sviluppo: una procedura multimetodo per l'assessment delle dinamiche familiari
No full textIl Capitolo descrive l'esperienza di lavoro con le famiglie nei centri di riabilitazione per i Disturbi dello Sviluppo del bambino (disturbi dell'apprendimento, del linguaggio e Disturbi generalizzati dello sviluppo. Durante la presa in carico del bambino, la famiglia affronta la procedura Lausanne Trilogue Play clinico per focalizzare la coordinazione familiare e le dinamiche di coparenting durante un'esperienza condivisa di gioco. La codifica delle interazioni permette di valutare - insieme ai genitori- risorse e ostacoli a livello della disponibilità ad interagire (partecipazione), dell'organizzazione dei ruoli intergenerazionali e cogenitoriali, dell'attenzione condivisa e del contatto affettivo. tali livelli funzionali appaiono indicativi della funzionalità dell'intersoggettività collettiva nella famiglia
An edition of Ottorino Respighi's Fantasia Slava, p. 50 with an analysis of his early style
No full textElectronic Thesis or DissertationFantasia Slava, a 1903 work by Ottorino Respighi (1879-1936) for piano and orchestra, can be considered the embodiment of his early style. The characteristics of this style will be examined through brief analyses of four works written prior to Fantasia Slava: Violin Sonata in D Minor (1897), P. 15; Piano Sonata in F Minor, P. 16 (1897); Six Pieces for Violin and Piano, P. 31 (1901-2); and Piano Quintet in F Minor (1902). The characteristics developed over the course of these pieces directly affected the construction of Fantasia Slava and shows the young composer developing his compositional language. This document also includes an edition of Fantasia Slava for two pianos-one piano designated for the solo and another a piano reduction of the orchestral part. The sole publication of Fantasia Slava is the orchestral score from Ricordi, copyrighted in 1986. It is from this edition that the author has drawn his two-piano edition. The manuscript for Fantasia Slava, P. 50 was not available for review at the time of this document. Permission to utilize the first edition of the work in such a manner was graciously granted by Lucia Castellina, editor at Casa Ricordi, in a November 14, 2013, email to the author. The orchestral reduction is intended to reflect accurately the sonority and scope of the orchestra score, while remaining playable and true to the inherent properties of the modern piano. Critical notes following the edition reflect discrepancies between the orchestral score and the present edition. They also outline salient points regarding the edition's creation
An edition of Ottorino Respighi's Fantasia Slava, p. 50 with an analysis of his early style
No full textFantasia Slava, a 1903 work by Ottorino Respighi (1879-1936) for piano and orchestra, can be considered the embodiment of his early style. The characteristics of this style will be examined through brief analyses of four works written prior to Fantasia Slava: Violin Sonata in D Minor (1897), P. 15; Piano Sonata in F Minor, P. 16 (1897); Six Pieces for Violin and Piano, P. 31 (1901-2); and Piano Quintet in F Minor (1902). The characteristics developed over the course of these pieces directly affected the construction of Fantasia Slava and shows the young composer developing his compositional language. This document also includes an edition of Fantasia Slava for two pianos-one piano designated for the solo and another a piano reduction of the orchestral part. The sole publication of Fantasia Slava is the orchestral score from Ricordi, copyrighted in 1986. It is from this edition that the author has drawn his two-piano edition. The manuscript for Fantasia Slava, P. 50 was not available for review at the time of this document. Permission to utilize the first edition of the work in such a manner was graciously granted by Lucia Castellina, editor at Casa Ricordi, in a November 14, 2013, email to the author. The orchestral reduction is intended to reflect accurately the sonority and scope of the orchestra score, while remaining playable and true to the inherent properties of the modern piano. Critical notes following the edition reflect discrepancies between the orchestral score and the present edition. They also outline salient points regarding the edition's creation. (Published By University of Alabama Libraries
Erratum: Search for photons with energies above 1018 eV using the hybrid detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory (Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2017) 4 (9) DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/009)
No full text1 Exposure calculation Due to a mistake in the numerical integration following eq. (6.2) of the original article [1], the exposure shown in figure 5 of the original article was incorrect. The correct exposure is shown in figure 1. 2 Upper limits on the integral photon flux and fraction The incorrect exposure affects the calculation of the upper limits on the integral photon flux following eq. (6.1) of the original article. The correct values for the upper limits are 0.038, 0.010, 0.009, 0.008 and 0.007 km−2 sr−1 yr−1 for threshold energies of 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 EeV. The correct values for the upper limits on the integral photon fraction subsequently derived are 0.14 %, 0.17 %, 0.42 %, 0.86 % and 2.9 % for the same threshold energies. 3 Author list The author list of this erratum also corrects a mistake made in the original article, where F. Zuccarello was missing and Z. Zong was listed twice
Erratum: Search for photons with energies above 1018 eV using the hybrid detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory
No full textExposure calculation Due to a mistake in the numerical integration following eq. (6.2) of the original article [1], the exposure shown in figure 5 of the original article was incorrect. The correct exposure is shown in figure 1. 2 Upper limits on the integral photon flux and fraction The incorrect exposure affects the calculation of the upper limits on the integral photon flux following eq. (6.1) of the original article. The correct values for the upper limits are 0.038, 0.010, 0.009, 0.008 and 0.007 km−2 sr−1 yr−1 for threshold energies of 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 EeV. The correct values for the upper limits on the integral photon fraction subsequently derived are 0.14 %, 0.17 %, 0.42 %, 0.86 % and 2.9 % for the same threshold energies. 3 Author list The author list of this erratum also corrects a mistake made in the original article, where F. Zuccarello was missing and Z. Zong was listed twice
Evidence for a mixed mass composition at the ‘ankle’ in the cosmic-ray spectrum
No full textWe report a first measurement for ultrahigh energy cosmic rays of the correlation between the depth of shower maximum and the signal in the water Cherenkov stations of air-showers registered simultaneously by the fluorescence and the surface detectors of the Pierre Auger Observatory. Such a correlation measurement is a unique feature of a hybrid air-shower observatory with sensitivity to both the electromagnetic and muonic components. It allows an accurate determination of the spread of primary masses in the cosmic-ray flux. Up till now, constraints on the spread of primary masses have been dominated by systematic uncertainties. The present correlation measurement is not affected by systematics in the measurement of the depth of shower maximum or the signal in the water Cherenkov stations. The analysis relies on general characteristics of air showers and is thus robust also with respect to uncertainties in hadronic event generators. The observed correlation in the energy range around the ‘ankle’ at lg(E/eV)=18.5–19.0lg(E/eV)=18.5–19.0 differs significantly from expectations for pure primary cosmic-ray compositions. A light composition made up of proton and helium only is equally inconsistent with observations. The data are explained well by a mixed composition including nuclei with mass A>4A>4. Scenarios such as the proton dip model, with almost pure compositions, are thus disfavored as the sole explanation of the ultrahigh-energy cosmic-ray flux at Earth
Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays: The Intersection of the Cosmic and Energy Frontiers
No full textThe present white paper is submitted as part of the "Snowmass" process to
help inform the long-term plans of the United States Department of Energy and
the National Science Foundation for high-energy physics. It summarizes the
science questions driving the Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic-Ray (UHECR) community
and provides recommendations on the strategy to answer them in the next two
decades.Comment: Prepared as a solicited white paper for the 2021 Snowmass process. To
be published in the Journal of High Energy Astrophysics. v2: fixed typos in
author list. v3: included all community feedback received by July 1st 2022
and added the list of endorser
