1,720,983 research outputs found

    FR 173657: a new, potent, nonpeptide kinin B2 receptor antagonist. An in vitro study

    No full text
    FR 173657, the first effective nonpeptide kinin B2 receptor antagonist, has been tested in four preparations from different species (human, pig, rabbit, and guinea pig). The new compound shows high apparent affinity for the four B2 receptors, with pA2 values ranging from 8.2 to 9.4. FR 173657 is a selective B2 receptor antagonist that does not interact with human, pig, or rabbit B1 receptors. The new compound is extremely specific for the kinin B2 receptors as it does not affect the myotropic effects of norepinephrine, endothelin-1, or 5-hydroxytryptamine in the human umbilical vein; the contractions elicited by substance P and angiotensin II in the rabbit jugular vein or those produced by acetylcholine and histamine in the guinea pig ileum; or the relaxation of the pig coronary artery induced by norepinephrine and substance P. FR 173657 acts as a competitive antagonist over an extended range of concentrations on human and rabbit B2 receptors, whereas on pig and guinea pig receptors, i...FR 173657, the first effective nonpeptide kinin B2 receptor antagonist, has been tested in four preparations from different species (human, pig, rabbit, and guinea pig). The new compound shows high apparent affinity for the four B2 receptors, with pA2 values ranging from 8.2 to 9.4 FR 173657 is a selective B2 receptor antagonist that does not interact with human, pig, or rabbit B1 receptors. The new compound is extremely specific for the kinin B2 receptors as it does not affect the myotropic effects of norepinephrine, endothelin-1, or 5-hydroxytryptamine in the human umbilical vein; the contractions elicited by substance P and angiotensin II in the rabbit jugular vein or those produced by acetylcholine and histamine in the guinea pig ileum; or the relaxation of the pig coronary artery induced by norepinephrine and substance P. FR 173657 acts as a competitive antagonist over an extended range of concentrations on human and rabbit B2 receptors, whereas on pig and guinea pig receptors, it depresses the maximal effect of bradykinin and thus appears to act as a noncompetitive antagonist

    FR 173657: a new, potent, nonpeptide kinin B2 receptor antagonist. An in vitro study

    No full text
    FR 173657, the first effective nonpeptide kinin B2 receptor antagonist, has been tested in four preparations from different species (human, pig, rabbit, and guinea pig). The new compound shows high apparent affinity for the four B2 receptors, with pA2 values ranging from 8.2 to 9.4 FR 173657 is a selective B2 receptor antagonist that does not interact with human, pig, or rabbit B1 receptors. The new compound is extremely specific for the kinin B2 receptors as it does not affect the myotropic effects of norepinephrine, endothelin-1, or 5-hydroxytryptamine in the human umbilical vein; the contractions elicited by substance P and angiotensin II in the rabbit jugular vein or those produced by acetylcholine and histamine in the guinea pig ileum; or the relaxation of the pig coronary artery induced by norepinephrine and substance P. FR 173657 acts as a competitive antagonist over an extended range of concentrations on human and rabbit B2 receptors, whereas on pig and guinea pig receptors, it depresses the maximal effect of bradykinin and thus appears to act as a noncompetitive antagonist

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    1999, Pharmacological characterisation of the first non-peptide bradykinin B2 receptor agonist FR 190997: an in vitro study on human, rabbit and pig vascular B2 receptors

    No full text
    FR 190997, a new kinin B2 receptor agonist of non-peptide nature, has been studied in three isolated vessels: the human umbilical vein (hUV), the rabbit jugular vein (rbJV), and the pig coronary artery (pCA). Bradykinin (BK) contracts the hUV and rbJV through smooth muscle B2 receptors, while it relaxes the pCA through endothelial receptors of the B2 type. Contractions of the hUV and rbJV in response to FR 190997 show slow onset and are not reproducible compared to the rapid and reproducible effect of BK. They reach only 70% and 30% of the BK-induced maximal contractions in the hUV and rbJV, respectively. The effects of FR 190997 are antagonised by HOE 140 and this antagonist shows similar pK(B) values against BK and FR 190997, indicating that the non-peptide agent interacts with the kinin B2 receptor. FR 190997 is inactive as relaxant of the pCA; in this tissue, it acts as a pure and competitive antagonist, with a pK(B) value of 7.6, while HOE 140 acts as an insurmountable antagonist (pK(B) 9.3). When tested as an antagonist, FR 190997 inhibits also the contractile effects of BK in the hUV (pK(B) 7.8) and in the rbJV (pK(B) 7.6). FR 190997 is selective for the B2 receptor since it does not interact with the B1, and is specific since it does not affect the contraction evoked by 5-hydroxytryptamine, endothelin-1, and noradrenaline in the hUV, or the relaxation induced by substance P in the pCA. FR 190997 shows therefore different pharmacological profiles in various preparations, acting as a partial agonist in the hUV and especially in the rbJV and as a pure antagonist in the pCA. This new compound could be of interest in understanding how non-peptide agonists may activate receptors for peptides

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Antagonistic effects of FR173657 on human, pig, rabbit, and guinea pig kinin receptors: an in vitro study

    No full text
    The pharmacodynamic features of the new nonpeptide kinin B2 receptor antagonist FR 173657 were evaluated on pig, rabbit, guinea pig, and human native kinin B2 receptors. FR 173657 exerted high antagonistic activity in all preparations examined. In particular, it acts as a competitive antagonist in the rabbit jugular vein (pA2 8.9) and in the human umbilical vein (pA2 8.2) but as a noncompetitive antagonist in the pig coronary artery (pKB 9.2) and in the guinea pig ileum (pKB 9.2) stimulated with the selective B2 receptor agonist bradykinin (BK). In contrast, FR 173657 failed to antagonize the biological effects of the selective B1 receptor agonist LysdesArg9BK in the pig renal vein, rabbit aorta, and human umbilical vein, three kinin B1 receptor systems. Moreover, this compound was inactive against the effects induced by noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine, endothelin-1, angiotensin II, substance P, acetylcholine, and histamine in the B2 receptor preparations. Taken together, these results demonstrate that FR 173657 is the first potent nonpeptide B2 receptor antagonist with high affinity, selectivity, and specificity for kinin B2 receptors of different species, including man

    Pharmacological characterisation of the first non-peptide bradykinin B2 receptor agonist FR 190997: An in vitro study on human, rabbit and pig vascular B2 receptors

    No full text
    FR 190997, a new kinin B2 receptor agonist of non-peptide nature, has been studied in three isolated vessels: the human umbilical vein (hUV), the rabbit jugular vein (rbJV), and the pig coronary artery (pCA). Bradykinin (BK) contracts the hUV and rbJV through smooth muscle B2 receptors, while it relaxes the pCA through endothelial receptors of the B2 type. Contractions of the hUV and rbJV in response to FR 190997 show slow onset and are not reproducible compared to the rapid and reproducible effect of BK. They reach only 70% and 30% of the BK-induced maximal contractions in the hUV and rbJV, respectively. The effects of FR 190997 are antagonised by HOE 140 and this antagonist shows similar pK(B) values against BK and FR 190997, indicating that the non-peptide agent interacts with the kinin B2 receptor. FR 190997 is inactive as relaxant of the pCA; in this tissue, it acts as a pure and competitive antagonist, with a pK(B) value of 7.6, while HOE 140 acts as an insurmountable antagonist (pK(B) 9.3). When tested as an antagonist, FR 190997 inhibits also the contractile effects of BK in the hUV (pK(B) 7.8) and in the rbJV (pK(B) 7.6). FR 190997 is selective for the B2 receptor since it does not interact with the B1, and is specific since it does not affect the contraction evoked by 5-hydroxytryptamine, endothelin-1, and noradrenaline in the hUV, or the relaxation induced by substance P in the pCA. FR 190997 shows therefore different pharmacological profiles in various preparations, acting as a partial agonist in the hUV and especially in the rbJV and as a pure antagonist in the pCA. This new compound could be of interest in understanding how non-peptide agonists may activate receptors for peptides

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore