1,720,958 research outputs found
The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring
No full textThe next generation of surgical robotics is poised to disrupt healthcare systems worldwide, requiring new frameworks for evaluation. However, evaluation during a surgical robot’s development is challenging due to their complex evolving nature, potential for wider system disruption and integration with complementary technologies like artificial intelligence. Comparative clinical studies require attention to intervention context, learning curves and standardized outcomes. Long-term monitoring needs to transition toward collaborative, transparent and inclusive consortiums for real-world data collection. Here, the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term monitoring (IDEAL) Robotics Colloquium pro- poses recommendations for evaluation during development, comparative study and clinical monitoring of surgical robots—providing practical recommendations for developers, clinicians, patients and healthcare systems. Multiple perspectives are considered, including economics, surgical training, human factors, ethics, patient perspectives and sustainability. Further work is needed on standardized metrics, health economic assessment models and global applicability of recommendations
Author Correction: The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring
No full textIn the version of the article initially published, three authors were missing from The IDEAL Robotics Colloquium. Art Sedrakyan (Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA), Joel Horowitz (Maimonides Medical Center, New York, NY, USA) and Arsenio Paez (Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada) have all been added in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.</p
Author Correction:: The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring (Nature Medicine, (2024), 30, 1, (61-75), 10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7)
No full text\ua9 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2024.three authors were missing from The IDEAL Robotics Colloquium. Art Sedrakyan (Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA), Joel Horowitz (Maimonides Medical Center, New York, NY, USA) and Arsenio Paez (Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de G\ue9riatrie de Montr\ue9al (CRIUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada) have all been added in the HTML and PDF versions of the article
Author Correction: The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring
No full textIn the version of the article initially published, three authors were missing from The IDEAL Robotics Colloquium. Art Sedrakyan (Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA), Joel Horowitz (Maimonides Medical Center, New York, NY, USA) and Arsenio Paez (Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada) have all been added in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.</p
The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring
No full textThe next generation of surgical robotics is poised to disrupt healthcare systems worldwide, requiring new frameworks for evaluation. However, evaluation during a surgical robot's development is challenging due to their complex evolving nature, potential for wider system disruption and integration with complementary technologies like artificial intelligence. Comparative clinical studies require attention to intervention context, learning curves and standardized outcomes. Long-term monitoring needs to transition toward collaborative, transparent and inclusive consortiums for real-world data collection. Here, the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term monitoring (IDEAL) Robotics Colloquium proposes recommendations for evaluation during development, comparative study and clinical monitoring of surgical robots-providing practical recommendations for developers, clinicians, patients and healthcare systems. Multiple perspectives are considered, including economics, surgical training, human factors, ethics, patient perspectives and sustainability. Further work is needed on standardized metrics, health economic assessment models and global applicability of recommendations
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Author Correction:: The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring (Nature Medicine, (2024), 30, 1, (61-75), 10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7):The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring
No full textIn the version of the article initially published, three authors were missing from The IDEAL Robotics Colloquium. Art Sedrakyan (Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA), Joel Horowitz (Maimonides Medical Center, New York, NY, USA) and Arsenio Paez (Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada) have all been added in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.</p
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
