1,720,973 research outputs found

    Is the increased risk of liver enzyme elevation in patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis virus greater in those taking antiretroviral therapy?

    No full text
    Objectives: To investigate if the risk of liver enzyme elevation (LEE) in HIV/hepatitis B or C (HBV, HCV) co-infection is altered by HAART (two or more drugs). Methods: Analysis comprised HIV-positive patients in the ICoNA study without acute hepatitis who had >= 1 positive HCV antibody test and > 1 positive HBV surface antigen test. LEE was defined as > 5x baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or > 3.5x baseline if the baseline was > 40 IU/l. Analysis used Poisson regression with generalized estimating equation correction to examine HBV or HCV co-infection, use of HAART, baseline ALT and demographics as LEE predictors. Results: Of the 5272 patients, 47.6% were co-infected with HCV/HBV; 29.9% were female and 39% were intravenous drug users. There were 275 episodes of LEE during 18259 person-years follow up. Taking HAART did not significantly increase risk of LEE [adjusted relative risk (RR), 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-1.75; P = 0.37]. Co-infection increased the risk of LEE (adjusted RR, 5.07; 95% CI, 3.47-7.48; P < 0.001), with no significant differences if taking HAART (adjusted RR, 4.99; 95% CI, 3.38-7.37) or not (adjusted RR, 6.02; 95% CI, 2.02-17.98) (P = 0.74 for interaction). Females were at lower risk of LEE than males (adjusted RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.83; P = 0.02). Conclusions: HIV and HBV/HCV co-infection per se is associated with increased risk of LEE that is not modified by HAART. The recommendation for caution in HAART use in co-infected patients, simply based on a high rate of LEE in people on therapy, may be questionable. (c) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    The management of hepatitis B virus/HIV-1 co-infected patients starting their first HAART regimen. Treating two infections for the price of one drug?

    No full text
    Abstract: We examined the impact of a lamivudine-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen on 164 hepatitis B virus/HIV co-infected individuals starting their first HAART. Lamivudine-treated patients (accounting for 73% of the study population) showed a significantly lower level of alanine aminotransferase over follow-up [-81.1 mU/ml mean difference; 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl): -30.3; -131.7, P=0.003] and a significantly reduced risk of liver-related morbidity/mortality [Relative hazard (RH)=0.07; 95% CI: 0.01-0.38, P=0.002] than those starting a lamivudine sparing-regimen
    corecore