1,722,072 research outputs found
Advertisement for the Hjalmar Hvam Safety Bindings, circa 1946.
No full textAdvertisement for the Hjalmar Hvam Safety Bindings, circa 1946
Career development manual
No full text"Authors: Judith Hvam, Elaine Stewart"--Title page verso.This archived document is maintained by the State Library of Oregon as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes.Includes bibliographical references (page 159).Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection.Text in English
Arnold Lunn, left, ski historian and author of the book, The Story of Ski-ing, 1952. And Hjalmar Hvam, right, ski pioneer and inventor of America\u27s first safety binding in 1937.
No full textPhoto shows skiing pioneers Arnold Lunn (left) and Hjalmar Hvam, probably in the 1940
Ski jumper Hjalmar Hvam, probably at Big Pines mountain camp, ca.1930
No full textPhotograph of ski jumper Hjalmar Hvam, probably at Big Pines mountain camp, ca.1930. The cap-donning jumper leaps into the air with his arms spread wide in front of him and his feet tight together. Below him are the tops of trees. An American flag can be seen partially at the lower right-hand corner. The background is neutral. At the back of the photoprint it is indicateed that this is a 242-foot jump
Proceedings of the 22nd International Configuration Workshop
Full text linkThe 2020 Workshop on Configuration continues the series of successful workshops organized within IJCAI, AAAI, and ECAI since 1999. Starting from 2013, the workshop was held independently from major conferences. Even in this 22nd edition, beside researchers from a variety of different fields, it attracted a significant number of industrial participants from major configurator vendors as well as from end-users. The 2020 Workshop on Configuration is a standalone two-day event. It was planned to takes place in Vicenza, Italy at the Department of Management and Engineering of Padova University. Due to COVID19 pandemic, it has been moved online. A total of 18 papers were selected for presentation on the Configuration Workshop. All papers underwent to full paper blind review with a minimum of two independent reviewers per paper. All papers have been substantially changed to comply with the reviewers’ observations. The themes of the technical sessions are knowledge representation & reasoning, peculiar technologies for configuration (machine learning, conversational agents (chatboats and voiceboats), social software, Microsoft excel), configuration of products in use (reconfiguration, adaptation, renovation, maintenance, repair), business applications with a special focus on the provision of empirical data to depict the state of the art on configuration practices
Complexity of Configurators Relative to Types of Outputs
No full textIndustrial gained and potential benefits of configurators are explored and researched to great extent in the literature. Moreover, configurators generate most of the needed documents automatically, which can be an effective solution to reduce the number of manual tasks. The generated documents include variety of customized knowledge such as BOM (bills of materials) or 2D and 3D figures. However, the influence of number and type of generated documents on the complexity of configurator has not been addressed in the literature. This paper aims to study the popular generated documents from configurators in an engineering company. Moreover, this study analyses the influence of different types of the generated documents on configurators’ complexity. The research method is survey-based followed with interviews where the unit of analysis is based on operating configurators within an engineering company
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
