130,181 research outputs found

    Lawson & Hutton (186b26)

    No full text
    Hal Lawson and Poncho Hutton pose for a photograph. Note on back reads: "Mike Poncho Hutton, my CP after we lost Buch Hale who was killed on a local flite[sic] with Minter." One black and white photograph

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Hutton (227b26)

    No full text
    A posed portrait of R. M. Hutton of the 437th Bomb Squadron. One black and white photograph

    R.M. Hutton (208b26)

    No full text
    "Poncho" Hutton poses for a photograph. One black and white photograph

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Lt. Hutton (170b26)

    No full text
    A posed photograph of Lt. R. M. Hutton of the 437th Bomb Squadron. One black and white photograph

    Lawson & Hutton (662b26)

    No full text
    Hal Lawson (left) and Poncho Hutton pose together. Tents can be seen in the background. One black and white photograph

    Lawson & Hutton (184b26)

    No full text
    Hal Lawson and Poncho Hutton pose wearing Algerian fezzes in front of a building. One black and white photograph

    Therasia valeria Hutton 1883

    No full text
    Therasia valeria Hutton, 1883 Pl. 4, fig. H Hutton, 1883. The New Zealand Journal of Science, 1: 477. Type material. Lectotype (designated here), CMNZ M12779 [ex M261], and paralectotype (1), CMNZ M261 (dry shells). The molluscan collection at CMNZ has radulae and a jaw mounted on glass slides with the label details ‘ Therasia valeria, Dunedin, XIV p. 151 (hypopolia)’, in Hutton’s handwriting (i.e., CMNZ 2017.17.67–2017.17.68), which is probably primary type material (see Hutton 1884b: 183). Label details. M261—‘47. Therasia valeria Hutton, Dunedin’, pillbox label in Hutton’s handwriting. Type locality. ‘Dunedin (Hutton)’ (Hutton 1883g: 477, 1884b: 183). Previous illustrations of type material. Radula illustrated by Hutton (1882h: pl. 3, fig. B, pl. 4, fig. H), which was incorrectly identified as Patula hypopolia Pfeiffer (see Hutton 1884b: 183), possibly from the type material of Therasia valeria Hutton, 1883; radula illustrated by Hutton (1884b: pl. 9, fig. N) probably from type material; Pilsbry (1892 [in 1892–1893]: 70, pl. 22, figs. 46–48—‘drawn by Mr. Suter from Prof. Hutton’s type’); Suter (1913: pl. 9, figs. 8, a, b—probably the same specimen as illustrated by Pilsbry). Remarks. The type material of Therasia valeria was collected by Hutton himself. He submitted a description of this species to the Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute issue for 1883, but publication was delayed until May 1884 (Hutton 1884b: 183), and was pre-empted by a brief description in an account of a meeting of the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury (Hutton 1883g: 477). The lectotype is a juvenile shell that closely matches the dimensions given by Hutton (1884b: 183), and it appears to be the same specimen that was illustrated by Pilsbry (1892 [in 1892–1893]: pl. 22, figs. 46–48). There has been confusion over the identity and distribution of T. valeria. This species was incorrectly identified as Patula hypopolia Pfeiffer by Hutton (1882h: 151 —see Hutton 1884b: 183); recorded as T. valeria from Dunedin only by Hutton (1884b: 183, Hutton 1884c: 202); and from Dunedin and mid Canterbury by Hedley & Suter (1893: 640), Suter (1894b: 246, 1913: 663) and Powell (1979: 317). Preliminary results of a phylogenetic study, and examination of museum collections, indicate that T. valeria has a distribution restricted to eastern Otago (M. Kennedy unpub. data). Current taxonomy. Therasia valeria Hutton, 1883 — Hutton (1884c: 202), Hedley & Suter, (1893: 640), Suter (1913: 662), Powell (1979: 317), Spencer et al. (2009: 216). Distribution. New Zealand; eastern Otago, South Island (AIM and NMNZ collection records). Family PUNCTIDAE Morse, 1864Published as part of Brook, Fred J., Kennedy, Martyn, King, Tania M., Ridden, Johnathon, Shaw, Matthew D. & Spencer, Hamish G., 2020, Catalogue of New Zealand land, freshwater and estuarine molluscan taxa named by Frederick Wollaston Hutton between 1879 and 1904, pp. 1-73 in Zootaxa 4865 (1) on page 39, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4865.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/442842

    Amphidoxa lavinia Hutton 1883

    No full text
    Amphidoxa lavinia Hutton, 1883 Pl. 7, fig. B Hutton, 1883. The New Zealand Journal of Science, 1: 476. Type material. Syntypes (2), NMNZ M.1754 (dry shells). Label details. ‘ Palmerston North, T.W. Kirk’. Type locality. Stated by Hutton (1883g: 476, 1884b: 180) to be ‘Palmerston North’, but this is incorrect (see below). Remarks. Type material of Amphidoxa lavinia is illustrated here for the first time in pl. 7 fig. B. Hutton submitted a description of this species to the Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute issue for 1883, but publication was delayed until May 1884 (Hutton 1884b: 180), and was pre-empted by a brief description in an account of a meeting of the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury (Hutton 1883g: 476). These descriptions were based on specimens that T.W. Kirk sent to Hutton, and which putatively had been collected at Palmerston North, north of Wellington. However, there have been no other records of this species from New Zealand, and the locality details given by Kirk were undoubtedly incorrect. Suter (1913: 683) considered that Amphidoxa lavinia Hutton, 1883 was a junior synonym of Helix capillacea Férussac, 1832, from Australia, as did Iredale (1938: 119). Smith (1992: 299) stated that A. lavinia was “not known to occur in Australia ”, but this was probably based on a misinterpretation of Iredale’s synonymy. Re-examination of type material indicates that Amphidoxa lavinia Hutton, 1883 is actually a synonym of Helix sinclairi Pfeiffer, 1846. The latter taxon was described from one or more specimens collected by Dr. Andrew Sinclair in ‘Van Diemensland’ (= Tasmania, Australia). The lectotype (NHMUK 1842.11.2.23), fixed by inference of holotype (ICZN Article. 74.6) by Smith (1992: 304), is illustrated here for the first time in pl. 7, fig. C. Helix sinclairii is the type species of the genus Tasmaphena Iredale, 1933, in the family Rhytididae, by original designation. It is endemic to mid-northern, central and southern Tasmania (Smith & Kershaw 1981: 69, map 36; Stanisic et al. 2018: 98). Taxonomy. Treated here as a subjective junior synonym of Tasmaphena sinclairii (Pfeiffer, 1846) N. syn.Published as part of Brook, Fred J., Kennedy, Martyn, King, Tania M., Ridden, Johnathon, Shaw, Matthew D. & Spencer, Hamish G., 2020, Catalogue of New Zealand land, freshwater and estuarine molluscan taxa named by Frederick Wollaston Hutton between 1879 and 1904, pp. 1-73 in Zootaxa 4865 (1) on pages 57-59, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4865.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/442842
    corecore