1,721,068 research outputs found
Experiment, Theory, Representation: Robert Hooke’s Material Models
Robert Hooke’s Micrographia of 1665 is an epochal work in the history of scientific
representation. With microscopes and other optical devices, Hooke drew and
then oversaw the engraving of Micrographia’s plates, images that amount to little
less than revelations from beneath the range of human vision (Fig. 1). In bristling
detail, molds flower into putrid bloom, crystals protrude like warts from mineral
skins and, for the first time in history, cells are brought to the eyes of a general
viewership. So historical scholarship has shown us, Hooke was especially well
equipped to make these wondrous images. A product of Oxford’s lively scientific
community of the 1650s and a protégé of the chemist Robert Boyle, he possessed
intimate knowledge of the “new sciences” of the seventeenth century and a particular
gift as an experimentalist. Indeed, from 1662 until nearly the end of his life,
Hooke held the post of “Curator of Experiments” to England’s premier scientific
institution, the then newly-formed Royal Society of London. But, Hooke also had
an additional advantage. Following some remarkable, juvenile feats of drawing, he
had previously been apprenticed to Peter Lely, leading portrait painter of later seventeenth
century England. Combining scientific training with tutelage in the art of
portraiture—that most detail-attentive of pictorial genres (at least as practiced in
seventeenth century England)—Hooke would seem to have commanded the ideal
skills for rendering the sights made perceptible through microscopes. Not surprisingly,
Hooke’s Micrographia has served as an important point of reference in recent
studies of the interactions of art and science
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
