1,720,972 research outputs found

    Fully phased human genome assembly without parental data using single-cell strand sequencing and long reads

    Get PDF
    Human genomes are typically assembled as consensus sequences that lack information on parental haplotypes. Here we describe a reference-free workflow for diploid de novo genome assembly that combines the chromosome-wide phasing and scaffolding capabilities of single-cell strand sequencing with continuous long-read or high-fidelity sequencing data. Employing this strategy, we produced a completely phased de novo genome assembly for each haplotype of an individual of Puerto Rican descent (HG00733) in the absence of parental data. The assemblies are accurate (quality value > 40) and highly contiguous (contig N50 > 23 Mbp) with low switch error rates (0.17%), providing fully phased single-nucleotide variants, indels and structural variants. A comparison of Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Pacific Biosciences phased assemblies identified 154 regions that are preferential sites of contig breaks, irrespective of sequencing technology or phasing algorithms

    Structural and transduction patterns of human-specific polymorphic SVA insertions

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background SINE variable number tandem repeat Alu elements (SVAs) are a unique group of hominid-specific composite retrotransposons with highly variable internal structure. They represent the youngest TE family in humans and contribute to genetic diversity, evolution, and disease. Recent findings indicate that SVA mobilization rates may exceed previous estimates, and many SVAs exhibit insertion polymorphism. SVAs facilitate transduction (TD) events when transcription initiates upstream of a source element, or when their internal termination signal is bypassed, mobilizing adjacent 5’ and/or 3’ sequence. To investigate features of non-reference SVA elements currently polymorphic in the human genome, we analyzed a structural variant callset built upon 35 diverse human genomes generated by the Human Genome Structural Variation Consortium. Results In our curated dataset of 543 polymorphic, non-reference SVAs, we identify insertions representing the three youngest subfamilies: D (7%), E (38%), and F (55%). Of the latter, we determine that at least 47% are actually SVA_F1, a more recently discovered human-specific subfamily, indicating that F1 is a major contributor to SVA expansion in the human population. We further uncover that 40% of non-reference SVAs carry a TD on their 5’ and/or 3’ ends. Of these, the majority (69%) harbor sequence originating in a gene, including 14 exonic events and the mobilization of a processed pseudogene, supporting the role of SVA in exon shuffling. In addition, we identified a so-called “orphan” TD, defined by the absence of SVA sequence at the insertion site. Leveraging TD origin coordinates, we identify 55 active source elements, including nine non-reference and 46 across GRCh38 and T2T-CHM13, giving rise to 84% of TD-carrying SVAs. Conclusions Our analyses indicate that SVA_F1 is more active than previously described and is a main driver of SVA expansion. We find two-fold more TD events compared to previous estimates, with an unexpected bias toward 3’ events. Finally, we postulate that the discrepant SVA mobilization rate may be attributed to inter-individual variation in the presence/absence of source elements, a recent uptick in mobilization supported by overall low allele frequencies, and/or negative selection against deleterious insertions

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore