1,722,652 research outputs found
sj-docx-2-nah-10.1177_02601060221099782 - Supplemental material for Inadequate fruits and vegetables consumption among Malaysian adults during the COVID-19 pandemic
Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-nah-10.1177_02601060221099782 for Inadequate fruits and vegetables consumption among Malaysian adults during the COVID-19 pandemic by Yi Liang Lo, Siew Siew Lee and Shi-Hui Cheng in Nutrition and Health</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
sj-docx-1-jvm-10.1177_13567667231193436 - Supplemental material for The longer the better? The impact of online review length on tourist trust and visit intention
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jvm-10.1177_13567667231193436 for The longer the better? The impact of online review length on tourist trust and visit intention by Chien-Jung Molly Huang, Shih-Chieh Chuang, Yin-Hui Cheng and Chia-Chen Hsieh in Journal of Vacation Marketing</p
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Flot2 targeted by miR-449 acts as a prognostic biomarker in glioma
We, the Editors and Publisher of the journal Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, have retracted the following article:Shaosong Huang, Shihao Zheng, Shengyue Huang, Hui Cheng, Ying Lin, Yuxing Wen & Wei Lin (2019) Flot2 targeted by miR-449 acts as a prognostic biomarker in glioma. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 47(1), 250–255, DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1549062Since publication, concerns have been raised about the integrity of the data in the article. When approached for an explanation, the authors have been unresponsive, and we have been unable to verify their original data. We are therefore retracting this article and the corresponding author listed in this publication has been informed.We have been informed in our decision-making by our policy on publishing ethics and integrity and the COPE guidelines on retractions.The retracted article will remain online to maintain the scholarly record, but it will be digitally watermarked on each page as “Retracted”
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
