1,720,958 research outputs found
Palaeogeography and tectonic structure of allochthonous units in the German part of the Rhenohercynian Belt: revision and comment - Reply
Huneke (Int J Earth Sci 2005) gives a new interpretation of the tectonic setting of five K-40/Ar-40 analyses published by Huckriede et al. (Int J Earth Sci 93: 414-431, 2004). In this context, Huneke discusses the significance and provenance of Late Proterozoic K-40/Ar-40-cooling ages of detrital muscovites from pre-flysch sediments of the Blankenburg and Harzgerode Zones (Harz Mountains). Huneke's reinterpretation is based on a wrong concept concerning the extend of the Blankenburg Zone. This wrong concept originates from the incorrect distinction between the greywackes of the Tanne Zone and the greywackes of the Gie Beta en-Harz Nappe. These greywackes can be easily distinguished by petrographic methods. Huneke additionally defends the assumption that large areas of the eastern Harz Mountains consist of Visean olistostromes. There is no need for an extended discussion of this topic because Huneke presents no arguments
Reply to Oczlon's (2006) comment
The comment of Martin Oczlon contains some significant contributions to the topics discussed in the article of Huckriede et al. (Int J Earth Sci 93:414-431, 2004). Contrary to Oczlon's comment, the central results of Huckriede et al. (Int J Earth Sci 93:414-431, 2004) are clearly different from the tectonic model of Oczlon (Geol Rundsch 83:20-31, 1994). Additionally, there is no reason for a new interpretation of the K-40/Ar-40 muscovite cooling-ages from allochthonous units
Hydrographic and climatic changes recorded in Holocene sediments of the central Baltic Sea
Palaeogeography and tectonic structure of allochthonous units in the German part of the Rheno-Hercynian Belt (Central European Variscides)
New information on palaeogeography, orogenic evolution, tectonic structure, and boundaries of allochthonous units in the Rheno-Hercynian Belt is based on provenance analyses of clastic sediments and field studies. K-40/Ar-40 dating of detrital muscovites proved to be a particularly useful method because Cadomian, Caledonian and Early Variscan provenances of detrital material can be distinguished. Cadomian muscovite cooling ages are restricted to allochthonous units whereas Caledonian ages dominate within par-autochthonous and shortly displaced allochthonous units. The largest and uppermost preserved nappe, the Giessen-Harz Nappe, is derived from an oceanic flysch basin, which was not reached by Caledonian detritus. The other allochthonous units form a duplex-like structure sandwiched between the Giessen-Harz Nappe and par-autochthonous units at its base. The thick and heterogeneous roof- and floor-thrusts of this structure were previously often misinterpreted as olistostromes. The northern margin of allochthonous units is the steeply dipping Horre-Gommern Zone. It consists of three sub-units derived from deep-water areas between the shelf at the southern margin of the Old Red Sandstone Continent and an oceanic basin to the south. The southeastern part of the duplex-structure (Harzgerode Zone) shows close affinities to Armorican terranes
Large-scale Variscan shearing at the southeastern margin of the eastern Rhenohercynian belt: a reinterpretation of chaotic rock fabrics in the Harz Mountains, Germany
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
