1,721,037 research outputs found

    The aesthetics research in Huang Pi-lieh's books collecting

    No full text
    碩士本研究以乾嘉時期藏書家黃丕烈為主要研究對象,取其題跋為主要研究材料,兼取其詩作為次要材料。從中舉出可作為研究問題解答的案例,本研究主要處理四個問題:一、黃丕烈的藏書生活有哪些審美對象?包括書之美、居之美、行之美、知音之美及自然景物之美;二、黃丕烈對於審美對象的態度表現為何?包括佞宋、抱殘守缺、美則愛美則傳、得失、率真、妙趣、野趣、志同道合、悅山樂水、美不自美因人而彰、各遂其性等;三、黃丕烈的藏書生活中從事那些審美活動?包括校書、刻書、抄書、祭書、曝書、訪書、撰寫題跋(自己或他人代作)、裝潢、流通、構建藏書樓、遊賞、省墓、心靈交流、賦詩唱和、以景入興等;四、黃丕烈的審美活動有哪些價值?包括宋版書的價值、殘本的價值、書與錢的價值比較、欣賞與創作的價值、了解自我的價值、保存文化的價值、旅行的價值、知音的價值、反映社會的價值等,藉此以綜述黃丕烈的審美歷程,並提出未來可能的研究方向。In this study, Huang Pi Lie was a book-collecting expert of the Qianlong and Jiaqing period for the main object of study, whichever inscriptions as the main material, whichever poem as a secondary material. From the cited case to answer research questions, this study dealt mainly with the four questions: 1. What are the aesthetic object in Huang Pi Lie’s book collection of life? Including books, buildings, traffic, close friends, and natural features of beauty; 2. How was Huang Pi Lie’s attitude toward the aesthetic object? Including Adoring Song Dynasty, keeping watch for incomplete books, spreading wonderful books, gain and loss, sincerity, sparkling discourse, natural interesting, being in the same camp, loving mountain or sea, beauty for human being, individual characteristics; 3. What aesthetic activities did Huang Pi-Lie do in the book-collecting life? Including book-correcting, book-inscribing, book-transcribing, ceremony-holding, making his books bask in the sun, book-visit , inscription-writing, book-decorating, book-spreading, library-building, travel, grave-sweeping, mind-communicating, poem-making, etc; What is the value of Huang Pi Lie’s aesthetic activity? Including Song editions, incomplete editions, book and money, appreciation and creation, self worth, preservation of cultural, value of travel, value of close friends, reflection of society by review of Huang Pi Lie’s aesthetic course and propose possible research directions in the future.目錄 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………….1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………….1 第二節 研究問題與限制……………………………………………….2 第三節 研究理論基礎………………………………………………….4 一、 生活美學的範疇………………………………………….4 二、 審美主體和客體………………………………………….5 三、 審美活動………………………………………………….7 四、 審美體驗………………………………………………….8 五、 審美的價值……………………………………………...13 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………………...17 第一節 黃丕烈的藏書生平與著作…………………………………...17 一、 藏書的人生……………………………………………...17 二、 著作……………………………………………………...19 第二節 室名、別號、藏印與由來…………………………………...20 第三節 黃丕烈的藏書紀事舉要……………………………………...21 一、 佞宋……………………………………………………...21 二、 祭書……………………………………………………...23 三、 曝書……………………………………………………...26 四、 舟楫之事………………………………………………...27 第四節 黃丕烈的審美對象…………………………………………...30 一、 書之美…………………………………………………...30 二、 居之美…………………………………………………...31 三、 知音之美………………………………………………...33 四、 行之美…………………………………………………...34 五、 自然景物之美…………………………………………...35 第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………...38 第一節 研究方法……………………………………………………...38 一、 觀察法…………………………………………………...38 二、 文獻分析法……………………………………………...38 第二節 資料蒐集……………………………………………………...40 一、 文本材料………………………………………………...40 二、 美學理論材料…………………………………………...42 第三節 研究綱要……………………………………………………...45 一、 背景陳述………………………………………………...45 二、 描述資料、觀察現象、比對資料、文獻探討………...46 三、 選擇研究方法…………………………………………...47 四、 研究結果與討論………………………………………...49 第四章 研究結果與討論………………………………………………………...49 第一節 黃丕烈的審美態度…………………………………………...49 一、 對藝術品的欣賞………………………………………...57 二、 對黃丕烈審美態度的各種假設性闡述………………...58 三、 任何情況下審美態度總包括兩個方面─注意和興趣...59 第二節 黃丕烈的審美活動…………………………………………...60 一、 審美活動有其歷史性…………………………………...66 二、 藏書審美活動的階段…………………………………...69 三、 藏書審美活動的形式…………………………………...70 四、 藏書審美活動的特徵…………………………………...73 第三節 審美價值……………………………………………………...74 一、 審美價值具有社會客觀性……………………………...76 二、 審美價值具有規律性…………………………………...77 三、 審美價值具有功利性…………………………………...77 四、 審美價值具有歷時性…………………………………...78 五、 審美價值具有聯結性…………………………………...78 六、 審美價值具有各種不同的表現形式…………………...80 七、 小結……………………………………………………...81 第五章 結論……………………………………………………………………...82 一、 回答問題…………………………………………………………...82 二、 黃丕烈的審美歷程綜述…………………………………………...84 三、 檢討與回顧………………………………………………………...85 四、 未來展望…………………………………………………………...85 參考文獻學號: 697020187, 學年度: 10

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore