1,721,448 research outputs found
sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672221092273 – Supplemental material for Gratitude Is Morally Sensitive
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672221092273 for Gratitude Is Morally Sensitive by Hongbo Yu, Yubo Zhou and Anne-Marie Nussberger in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
Preliminary study of virtual orthognathic surgical simulation and training
Hongbo Yu, Jie Cheng, Andrew Hua-an Cheng, and Steve Guofang She
Image-guided navigation in optimizing surgical management of craniomaxillofacial fibrous dysplasia
Xudong Wang, Yanping Lin, Hongbo Yu, Andrew Hua-an Cheng, Hao Sun, Chengtao Wang, and Guofang She
sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_09567976231192236 – Supplemental material for Comprehensive Social Trait Judgments From Faces in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_09567976231192236 for Comprehensive Social Trait Judgments From Faces in Autism Spectrum Disorder by Runnan Cao, Na Zhang, Hongbo Yu, Paula J. Webster, Lynn K. Paul, Xin Li, Chujun Lin and Shuo Wang in Psychological Science</p
sj-docx-1-spp-10.1177_19485506231168515 – Supplemental material for Are Guilt-Prone Power-Holders Less Corrupt? Evidence From Two Online Experiments
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-spp-10.1177_19485506231168515 for Are Guilt-Prone Power-Holders Less Corrupt? Evidence From Two Online Experiments by Yang Hu, Shiwei Qiu, Gaotong Wang, Kui Liu, Weijian Li, Hongbo Yu and Xiaolin Zhou in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p
sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_09567976221122765 – Supplemental material for Neural and Cognitive Signatures of Guilt Predict Hypocritical Blame
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_09567976221122765 for Neural and Cognitive Signatures of Guilt Predict Hypocritical Blame by Hongbo Yu, Luis Sebastian Contreras-Huerta, Annayah M. B. Prosser, Matthew A. J. Apps, Wilhelm Hofmann, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Molly J. Crockett in Psychological Science</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
