1,720,992 research outputs found
Figure 1 in Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants
No full textFigure 1. Head (A) and lateral (B) views of a typical member of the Iridomyrmex anceps complex (sp. A; specimen IRIDO217-16). Scale bars = 1 mm.Published as part of <i>Andersen, Alan N., Hoffmann, Benjamin D. & Oberprieler, Stefanie K., 2020, Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants, pp. 219-230 in Zoological Systematics 45 (3)</i> on page 220, DOI: 10.11865/zs.202025, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10109781">http://zenodo.org/record/10109781</a>
Figure 3 in Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants
No full textFigure 3. Scape length in relation to head length for selected species. A. Species A, G, H, I and J. B. Species B, K, L, M and N.Published as part of <i>Andersen, Alan N., Hoffmann, Benjamin D. & Oberprieler, Stefanie K., 2020, Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants, pp. 219-230 in Zoological Systematics 45 (3)</i> on page 223, DOI: 10.11865/zs.202025, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10109781">http://zenodo.org/record/10109781</a>
Figure 5 in Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants
No full textFigure 5. Distribution records of sequenced specimens from the Iridomyrmex anceps complex in Australia. Monsoonal tropics region shaded in grey. A. Species A, G, H and I. B. Species B, J, K, L, M, N, O and R. Abbreviations: WA—Western Australia, NT— Northern Territory, Qld—Queensland.Published as part of <i>Andersen, Alan N., Hoffmann, Benjamin D. & Oberprieler, Stefanie K., 2020, Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants, pp. 219-230 in Zoological Systematics 45 (3)</i> on page 226, DOI: 10.11865/zs.202025, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10109781">http://zenodo.org/record/10109781</a>
Figure 4 in Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants
No full textFigure 4. Images of the Iridomyrmex anceps complex. A–C. Adult. A. Sp. H (specimen IRIDO 244-16); B. sp. L (specimen RHYIR 078-16); C. sp. M (specimen IRIDO 249-16). D–H. Head. D. Sp. G (specimen IRIDO 230-16); E. sp. J (specimen RHYIR 081-16); F. sp. M (specimen IRIDO 249-16); G. sp. N (specimen RHYIR 095-16); H. sp. R (specimen IRIDO 252-16). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.Published as part of <i>Andersen, Alan N., Hoffmann, Benjamin D. & Oberprieler, Stefanie K., 2020, Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants, pp. 219-230 in Zoological Systematics 45 (3)</i> on page 225, DOI: 10.11865/zs.202025, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10109781">http://zenodo.org/record/10109781</a>
Figure 6 in Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants
No full textFigure 6. Variation in gastric pubescence among selected species of the Iridomyrmex anceps complex. A. Sp. B (specimen RHYIR 070), dorsal view. B. Sp. K (specimen RHYIR 076), dorsal view. C. Sp. M (specimen IRIDO 249), lateral view. D. Sp. N (specimen RHYIR 095), lateral view. E. Sp. O (specimen IRIDO 251-16), dorsal view. F. Sp. P (specimen IRIDO 250-16), dorsal view. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.Published as part of <i>Andersen, Alan N., Hoffmann, Benjamin D. & Oberprieler, Stefanie K., 2020, Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants, pp. 219-230 in Zoological Systematics 45 (3)</i> on page 227, DOI: 10.11865/zs.202025, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10109781">http://zenodo.org/record/10109781</a>
Figure 2 in Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants
No full textFigure 2. Summary CO1 tree of the 82 sequenced specimens of Iridomyrmex anceps. Maximum-likelihood phylogeny inferred using IQ-TREE. Black and red circles indicate bootstrap support values ≥90 and ≥70, respectively. The full CO1 tree is shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Abbreviations: WA—Western Australia, NT—Northern Territory, Qld—Queensland, PNG—Papua New Guinea.Published as part of <i>Andersen, Alan N., Hoffmann, Benjamin D. & Oberprieler, Stefanie K., 2020, Integrated morphological, CO1 and distributional analysis confirms many species in the Iridomyrmex anceps (Roger) complex of ants, pp. 219-230 in Zoological Systematics 45 (3)</i> on page 222, DOI: 10.11865/zs.202025, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10109781">http://zenodo.org/record/10109781</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
