1,720,979 research outputs found
PROPHYLAXIS OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS (CMV) DISEASE IN SOLID ORGAN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
No full textPRE-EMPTIVE TREATMENT FOR CYTOMEGALOVIRUS VIRAEMIA TO PREVENT CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE IN SOLID ORGAN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
No full textPre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viremia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients
No full textBackground. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Preemptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viremia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. Methods. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of preemptive treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Two authors extracted all data; analysis was with a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of preemptive treatment versus placebo or standard care (treatment of CMV when disease occurred), three of preemptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous preemptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, preemptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 trials, 288 patients, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 trials, 185 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 176 patients, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease (2 trials, 151 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.65), acute rejection (1 trial, 70 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.09) or all-cause mortality (3 trials, 151 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.72). Conclusions. Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of preemptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Preemptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of preemptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Copyright © 2006 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients
No full textBACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Pre-emptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viraemia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. OBJECTIVES: This review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2005), EMBASE (1980 to February 2005) and reference lists and conference proceedings were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pre-emptive treatment versus placebo, no treatment or antiviral prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors assessed the quality and extracted all data. Analysis was with a random-effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS: Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of pre-emptive treatment versus placebo or treatment of CMV when disease occurred (standard care), three of pre-emptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous pre-emptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, pre-emptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (six trials, 288 patients: RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (three trials, 185 patient: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (two trials, 176 patients: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of pre-emptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease, acute rejection or all-cause mortality. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Few RCTs have evaluated the effects of pre-emptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Pre-emptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of pre-emptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients
Immunoglobulins, vaccines or interferon for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients
Full text linkBackground: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common virus causing disease and death in solid organ transplant recipients during the first six months post-transplant. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated the efficacy of antiviral medications used prophylactically or pre-emptively in preventing CMV disease. In this review the efficacy of older agents (immunoglobulins (IgG), anti CMV vaccines and interferon) are examined. Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of IgG, anti CMV vaccines or interferon for preventing symptomatic CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists and abstracts from conference proceedings without language restriction. Date of last search: December 2005 Selection criteria: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing IgG, anti CMV vaccine or interferon with placebo or no treatment, IgG alone or combined with antiviral medications with antiviral medications or IgG alone in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Data collection and analysis: Two of four authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data from each trial. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results: Thirty seven trials (2185 participants) were included in this review. There was no significant difference in the risk for CMV disease (16 trials, 770 patients: RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.05), CMV infection (14 trials, 775 patients: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.10) or all-cause mortality (8 trials, 502 patients: RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.03) with IgG compared with placebo/no treatment. However IgG significantly reduced the risk of death from CMV disease (6 trials, 346 patients: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.80). There was no difference in the risk for CMV disease (4 trials, 298 patients: RR 1.17, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.86), CMV infection (4 trials, 298 patients: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.52) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 217 patients: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.29) between antiviral medication combined with IgG and antiviral medication alone. There was no significant difference in the risk of CMV disease with anti CMV vaccine or interferon compared with placebo or no treatment. Authors' conclusions: Currently there are no indications for IgG in the prophylaxis of CMV disease in recipients of solid organ transplants. Copyright © 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
