1,720,998 research outputs found
Gegenwärtige Theorien zur Cholesteatomentstehung
No full textSudhoff H, Hildmann H. Gegenwärtige Theorien zur Cholesteatomentstehung. HNO. 2003;51(1):71-83
Basic Principles of Cholesteatoma Surgery
No full textHildmann H, Sudhoff H, Jahnke K. Grundzüge einer differenzierten Cholesteatom-Chirurgie. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 2000;79(S2):S73-S94
Cholesteatoma in children
No full textHildmann H, Sudhoff H. Cholesteatoma in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 1999;49(Suppl. 1):S81-S86
Präoperative Embolisation mit chirurgischer Resektion von Glomustumoren im Kopf-Hals-Bereich: Analyse der klinischen Ergebnisse
No full textGirolami G, Heuser L, Hildmann H, Sudhoff H. Präoperative Embolisation mit chirurgischer Resektion von Glomustumoren im Kopf-Hals-Bereich: Analyse der klinischen Ergebnisse. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 2008;87(03):181-185
Immunhistochemische Untersuchungen von Mittelohrschleimhautresten im Cholesteatom
No full textSudhoff H, Borkowski G, Bujia J, Hildmann H, Fisseler-Eckhoff A. Immunhistochemische Untersuchungen von Mittelohrschleimhautresten im Cholesteatom. HNO. 1997;45(8):630-635
Immunohistochemical detection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in middle ear cholesteatoma
No full textBujia J, Sudhoff H, Holly A, Hildmann H, Kastenbauer E. Immunohistochemical detection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in middle ear cholesteatoma. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 1996;253(1-2):21-24
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
