1,720,976 research outputs found
On the Baum-Connes conjecture for groups acting on CAT(0)-cubical spaces
We give a new proof of the Baum–Connes conjecture with coefficients for any second countable, locally compact topological group that acts properly and cocompactly on a finite-dimensional CAT(0)-cubical space with bounded geometry. The proof uses the Julg–Valette complex of a CAT(0)-cubical space introduced by the 1st three authors and the direct splitting method in Kasparov theory developed by the last author
A differential complex for CAT(0) cubical spaces
In the 1980's Pierre Julg and Alain Valette, and also Tadeusz Pytlik and Ryszard Szwarc, constructed and studied a certain Fredholm operator associated to a simplicial tree. The operator can be defined in at least two ways: from a combinatorial flow on the tree, similar to the flows in Forman's discrete Morse theory, or from the theory of unitary operator-valued cocycles. There are applications of the theory surrounding the operator to C⁎-algebra K-theory, to the theory of completely bounded representations of groups that act on trees, and to the Selberg principle in the representation theory of p-adic groups. The main aim of this paper is to extend the constructions of Julg and Valette, and Pytlik and Szwarc, to CAT(0) cubical spaces. A secondary aim is to illustrate the utility of the extended construction by developing an application to operator K-theory and giving a new proof of K-amenability for groups that act properly on finite dimensional CAT(0)-cubical spaces
A proof of the Baum-Connes conjecture for -adic
We give a proof of the Baum-Connes conjecture for p-adic GL(n).</p
Spaces with Vanishing ^2ehBHomology and their Fundamental Groups (after Farber and Weinberger)
We characterize those groups which can occur as the fundamental groups of finite CW-complexes with vanishing ^2ehBhomology (the first examples of such groups were obtained by Farber and Weinberger)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
