1,720,960 research outputs found
Stratigraphic record across a retroarc basin inversion: Rocas Verdes–Magallanes Basin, Patagonian Andes, Chile
No full textAndean Forearc Dynamics, As Recorded By Detrital Zircon From the Eocene Talara Basin, Northwest Peru
No full text
Trench-arc interactions reflected in the sedimentary fill of Talara forearc basin, Northwest Peru
No full textLate Pleistocene glacial transitions in North America altered major river drainages, as revealed by deep-sea sediment
Full text linkPetrogenesis and provenance of distal volcanic tuffs from the Permian–Triassic Karoo Basin, South Africa: A window into a dissected magmatic province
No full textLate Cenozoic cooling favored glacial over tectonic controls on sediment supply to the western Gulf of Mexico
No full textThe ancestral Mississippi drainage archived in the late Wisconsin Mississippi deep-sea fan
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
