1,720,959 research outputs found
Ratibor Areal Berlin Kreuzberg
Full text linkRATIBOR AREAL BERLIN KREUZBERG
Ratibor Areal Berlin Kreuzberg / Heilgemeir, Anna (Rights reserved) (-
Spatial Commons. The neighbourhood and its local businesses as a socio-spatial commons
No full textGedruckt erschienen im Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, ISBN 978-3-7983-3145-7Der sogenannte Wrangelkiez in Kreuzberg ist eines der am stärksten von Gentrifizierung bedrohten Stadtviertel Berlins, verfügt aber zugleich über eine der widerstandsfähigsten Bewohnerschaften der Stadt. Die urbane Nachbarschaft wird in der vorliegenden Publikation unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Commons und des (Dis-)Commonings betrachtet. Dies geschieht aus dreierlei Perspektiven: Planung, Gemeinwesenarbeit und Bildungsarbeit. In der vorliegenden als Bildungsmaterial und Forschungsdokumentation zugleich konzipierten Publikation wird die Nachbarschaft auf ihre Potentiale ihrer Re-/Produktion von sozial-räumlichen Beziehungsgeflechten, Zugangssystemen aber auch in Bezug auf die Risiken der Abschöpfung nachbarschaftlich hergestellter "Güter" untersucht:
In welchem Zusammenhang stehen der Raum der Nachbarschaft, das Beziehungsgefüge der Nachbar_ innen und die täglichen Handlungen, die beides verbinden? Mit welchen Mitteln wird der urbane Raum als Ort der Interaktion und Teilhabe gemeinschaftlich erzeugt und erhalten? Welche geplanten oder ungeplanten Prozesse haben Einfluss auf die räumliche Struktur sowie auf den Alltag der Bewohner_innen und Nutzer_innen? Wer bedient sich der kollektiv erzeugten Werte im Raum bzw. wem werden sie zur Verfügung gestellt?
Die Publikation wurde durch Weiterbearbeitung der Ergebnisse des im Sommersemester 2017 durchgeführten Recherche- und Kartierungsseminars „Spatial Commons. Hin und weg vom Kiez“ erstellt sowie auf Grundlage der Ergebnisse eines "Fachtags zur Bedeutung von Gewerberäumen als Orte des Gemeinschaffens für die Nachbarschaft" im November 2018.The so-called Wrangelkiez in Kreuzberg is one of Berlin's districts most threatened by gentrification, but at the same time it is one of the most resistant neighbourhoods in the city. In this publication, this urban neighbourhood is considered from the perspective of the commons and the processes of (dis-)commoning. This is done from three perspectives: planning, community work and education. In this publication, conceived as educational material and research documentation at the same time, the neighbourhood is examined for its potential for the re/production of social-spatial relationships, but also in relation to the risks of the siphoning off of "goods" produced by and in the neighbourhood:
What is the relationship between the spaces of the neighbourhood, its social structure, and the daily actions that connect both? By what means is urban space as a place of interaction and participation jointly created and maintained? Which planned or unplanned processes have an influence on the spatial structure as well as on the everyday life of the residents and users? Who makes use of the collectively generated values in the space or to whom are they made available?
The publication was developed through further processing of the results of the research and mapping seminar "Spatial Commons. Hin und weg vom Kiez" conducted in the summer semester 2017 and on the basis and of the results of a "symposium on the importance of commercial spaces as places of community life for the neighbourhood" in November 2018.Bildungswerk Berlin der Heinrich-Böll Stiftun
Places of socio-spatial commoning as an untapped potential of planning
No full textIn dem Beitrag wird untersucht, inwiefern Bewohner:innen der Großsiedlung Berlin Neu-Hohenschönhausen an einer gemeinwohlorientierten Entwicklung, Gestaltung und Erhaltung ihrer Nachbarschaft beteiligt sind. Aufbauend auf den Ergebnissen eines dreisemestrigen kooperativen Lehrforschungsformats (2020–2023) zeigt die Autorin einen zentralen Widerspruch: Während die öffentliche Hand einerseits eine Beteiligung der Bevölkerung wünscht, bestehen gleichzeitig Vorbehalte gegenüber einer umfassenden Mitbestimmung. Die Bewohner:innen dagegen zeigen angesichts langjähriger Planungs- und Beteiligungsprozesse Ermüdung und fühlen sich mitunter übergangen.
Die Autorin schärft zunächst das Verständnis gemeinwohlorientierter Räume, die nur dann entstehen und möglichst vielen zugutekommen, wenn Menschen an ihrer Herstellung, Gestaltung und Pflege durch alltägliches Handeln beteiligt sind. Anhand von drei Beispielen – einem Zirkuszelt, einer Bibliothek in einem Einkaufszentrum und einem als Brachfläche gelesenen Freiraum mit Garagen – wird die vorhandene sozialräumliche Gemeingüterproduktion aufgezeigt und als Grundlage bereits lokal verankerter Partizipation interpretiert.
In der Diskussion werden die Erkenntnisse mit dokumentierten Hindernissen auf Seiten der kommunalen Hand verknüpft, um Potenziale für die Integration von Bewohner:innenperspektiven in die Planung aufzuzeigen. Das Fazit betont die Anerkennung alltäglicher, sozialräumlich geteilter urbaner Praktiken als Ausgangspunkt für eine gemeinwohlorientierte Weiterentwicklung von Großsiedlungen. Dabei wird die traditionelle Beteiligungspraxis in Frage gestellt und die alltägliche Reproduktion des Raumes als neue Basis von Partizipation und Gemeinwohlorientierung vorgeschlagen.This article examines if and how residents of the large housing estate Berlin Neu-Hohenschönhausen are involved in the common-good-oriented development, design, and maintenance of their neighborhood. Based on the results of a three-semester cooperative teaching and research project (2020–2023), the author identifies a central contradiction: while public authorities express a strong desire for citizen participation, they simultaneously exhibit reservations toward extensive co-determination; residents, in turn, often feel fatigued and overlooked after years of planning and participatory processes.
The study first clarifies the concept of common-good-oriented spaces, which only emerge when people actively participate in their creation, design, and everyday upkeep. Three case studies—a circus tent, a library in a shopping center, and an open space with garages read as a fallow land—illustrate the production of social-urban commons and are interpreted as a basis for locally embedded participation in urban space production.
In the discussion, these findings are linked to documented obstacles on the part of municipal authorities, highlighting potential ways to integrate residents’ perspectives into urban planning. The conclusion emphasizes the recognition of everyday, socially shared urban practices as a starting point for common-good-oriented development of large housing estates, challenging traditional top-down participation models and proposing the everyday reproduction of urban space as a foundation for genuine participation and the common-good-oriented development.BMBF, 01BF2107, Wohnqualität: Forschen mit Kindern und Jugendlichen zur Wohnqualität in der Großwohnsiedlun
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
