270 research outputs found

    Philip Strong letter to Reuben Wood, January 27, 1852

    No full text
    Legal correspondence written by Philip Strong to Governor Reuben Wood regarding a warrant to arrest Peyton Polly, dated January 27, 1852. Reuben Wood was governor of Ohio from 1850 through 1853, and was closely involved with the Peyton Polly case and attempts to secure the Polly family's release. Peyton Polly and his family were freedmen living in Lawrence County, Ohio, when they were kidnapped on June 6, 1850, and sold back into slavery in Kentucky and Virginia

    Stanley Matthews letter to Reuben Wood, March 23, 1852

    No full text
    Letter written to Governor Reuben Wood by Stanley Matthews in support of the appointment of Donn Piatt to a position in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, March 23, 1852. Stanley Matthews (1824-1889) was at the time a judge in the court. He secured a seat in the Ohio Senate in 1856 before being appointed U.S. District Attorney for Southern Ohio in 1858, and later served as a justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1881 to 1889. Reuben Wood was governor of Ohio from 1850 through 1853, and was closely involved with the Peyton Polly case and attempts to secure the Polly family's release. Peyton Polly and his family were freedmen living in Lawrence County, Ohio, when they were kidnapped on June 6, 1850, and sold back into slavery in Kentucky and Virginia

    The racial romance of Amy Levy's "Reuben Sachs"

    No full text
    On its publication in 1888, Reuben Sachs by Amy Levy (1861-1889) was initially received as being anti-Semitic in both the Jewish and the mainstream presses. Many reviews were scathingly critical, and some singled out the author for special abuse ...Peer reviewedFinal article published

    Peyton Polly legal fees document

    No full text
    Documentation of legal fees incurred by attorneys in the legal case of Peyton Polly, received and paid by the office of Governor Reuben Wood, March 10, 1852. Ralph Leete was prosecuting attorney for Lawrence County, Ohio, and led the legal effort to secure the freedom of family members in the case of Peyton Polly. Reuben Wood was governor of Ohio from 1850 through 1853, and was closely involved with the Peyton Polly case and attempts to secure the Polly family's release. Peyton Polly and his family were freedmen living in Lawrence County, Ohio, when they were kidnapped on June 6, 1850, and sold back into slavery in Kentucky and Virginia

    Bland Ballard letter to Ralph Leete, March 18, 1852

    No full text
    Copy of a letter written by Bland Ballard of Louisville, Kentucky, inquiring about outstanding fees owed in the legal case of Peyton Polly, from the papers of Ohio Governor Reuben Wood. Ballard was a District Judge in the United States District Court for the District of Kentucky, while Leete was prosecuting attorney for Lawrence County, Ohio, and led the legal effort to secure the freedom of family members in the case of Peyton Polly. Reuben Wood was governor of Ohio from 1850 through 1853, and was closely involved with the Peyton Polly case and attempts to secure the Polly family's release. Peyton Polly and his family were freedmen living in Lawrence County, Ohio, when they were kidnapped on June 6, 1850, and sold back into slavery in Kentucky and Virginia

    Jere Nash Interview with Reuben V. Anderson

    No full text
    Interview conducted by author Jere Nash with former civil rights attorney and Mississippi Supreme Court justice Reuben V. Anderson in the process of writing Mississippi Politics: The Struggle for Power, 1976-2006. Topics covered include Anderson\u27s family, religion, and education; Tougaloo College and the civil rights movement; attending University of Mississippi Law School; integation of Oxford locales; Jack Young; working as a civil rights lawyer in Jackson, Mississippi and for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund; Marian Wright Edelman; Lawrence Guyot; Lawyers\u27 Committee for Civil Rights Under Law in Jackson; Judge Harold Cox; handling the credentials fight for the Loyalists at the 1968 Democratic National Convention; Charles Evers; Aaron Henry; generational differences among factions of civil rights activists; Charles Evers\u27 1968 congressional campaign; Robert Clark; appointed as municipal court judge; Russell Davis; Eddie McBride\u27s 1972 congressional race; political races of African American candidates; Cliff Finch and appointment to Hinds County Court; Jimmy Carter; William Winter and appointment to Hinds County Circuit Court; registering to vote; Bill Allain and appointment to the Mississippi Supreme Court; Fred Banks; and the Mississippi State flag vote in 2001

    Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Dr. Scott Reuben allegedly fabricated data. The authors of the current article examined the impact of Reuben reports on conclusions of systematic reviews. METHODS: The authors searched in ISI Web of Knowledge systematic reviews citing Reuben reports. Systematic reviews were grouped into one of three categories: I, only cited but did not include Reuben reports; II, retrieved and considered, but eventually excluded Reuben reports; III, included Reuben reports. For quantitative systematic reviews (i.e., meta-analyses), a relevant difference was defined as a significant result becoming nonsignificant (or vice versa) by excluding Reuben reports. For qualitative systematic reviews, each author decided independently whether noninclusion of Reuben reports would have changed conclusions. RESULTS: Twenty-five systematic reviews (5 category I, 6 category II, 14 category III) cited 27 Reuben reports (published 1994-2007). Most tested analgesics in surgical patients. One of 6 quantitative category III reviews would have reached different conclusions without Reuben reports. In all 6 (30 subgroup analyses involving Reuben reports), exclusion of Reuben reports never made any difference when the number of patients from Reuben reports was less than 30% of all patients included in the analysis. Of 8 qualitative category III reviews, all authors agreed that one would certainly have reached different conclusions without Reuben reports. For another 4, the authors' judgment was not unanimous. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully performed systematic reviews proved robust against the impact of Reuben reports. Quantitative systematic reviews were vulnerable if the fraudulent data were more than 30% of the total. Qualitative systematic reviews seemed at greater risk than quantitative

    Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case

    No full text
    Udgivelsesdato: 2009-DecBACKGROUND: Dr. Scott Reuben allegedly fabricated data. The authors of the current article examined the impact of Reuben reports on conclusions of systematic reviews. METHODS: The authors searched in ISI Web of Knowledge systematic reviews citing Reuben reports. Systematic reviews were grouped into one of three categories: I, only cited but did not include Reuben reports; II, retrieved and considered, but eventually excluded Reuben reports; III, included Reuben reports. For quantitative systematic reviews (i.e., meta-analyses), a relevant difference was defined as a significant result becoming nonsignificant (or vice versa) by excluding Reuben reports. For qualitative systematic reviews, each author decided independently whether noninclusion of Reuben reports would have changed conclusions. RESULTS: Twenty-five systematic reviews (5 category I, 6 category II, 14 category III) cited 27 Reuben reports (published 1994-2007). Most tested analgesics in surgical patients. One of 6 quantitative category III reviews would have reached different conclusions without Reuben reports. In all 6 (30 subgroup analyses involving Reuben reports), exclusion of Reuben reports never made any difference when the number of patients from Reuben reports was less than 30% of all patients included in the analysis. Of 8 qualitative category III reviews, all authors agreed that one would certainly have reached different conclusions without Reuben reports. For another 4, the authors' judgment was not unanimous. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully performed systematic reviews proved robust against the impact of Reuben reports. Quantitative systematic reviews were vulnerable if the fraudulent data were more than 30% of the total. Qualitative systematic reviews seemed at greater risk than quantitative

    Justifying patents: a critique of the deontological approach

    No full text
    This thesis assesses philosophical arguments in favour of patent systems. These come in both consequentialist and deontological forms, the latter of which are the focus of this analysis. One kind of deontological argument is based on the concept of desert. I argue that on any plausible conception of desert, the patent system fails to distribute rewards as well as viable alternative systems could. The other kind of deontological argument claims that inventors are entitled to patent rights over their inventions as an extension of their natural rights, drawing on a Lockean account of the conditions of legitimate appropriation of unowned goods. After a discussion of the metaphysics of invention, and of the nature of the commons, I argue that Locke's conditions are not in fact always trivially satisfied in the case of patents. Furthermore, entitlement-based arguments conclude that because new inventions are unowned, claiming property rights in them involves only the same moral considerations that would apply in the state of nature. I argue that because we are not in the state of nature, pre-existing property rights also need to be taken into account, which conflict with patents. The broad conclusion of this thesis is that none of the plausible deontological arguments for patent systems are sound. The implication is that any justification of must therefore be made in consequentialist terms; this ultimately rests on strong empirical evidence rather than normative arguments alone

    Performing ‘deceased’ languages: Solomon Nangamu’s Manangkardi mirrijpu (seagull) songs and the living tradition of kun-borrk in western Arnhem Land

    No full text
    Kun-borrk is a song and dance tradition of Bininj (Aboriginal people) of western Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory of Australia. Bininj inherit languages and dialects through their father’s country, however the name kun-borrk comes from the Kunwinjku language, which has become a lingua franca in the community of Kunbarlanja and surrounds. Kun-borrk songs are accompanied by dances for men and women and are commonly named after animals, plants and spirits that live in the country associated with the songs. The songs are passed down from individual song men to their male relative or relatives. Song men who are the custodians of the songs may also conceive of ‘new’ songs in a dream, gifted to them by spirit intervention. These songs usually comprise of the same song texts and similar musical features as those that came before. They are added to the song set and performed in ceremony in a dynamic process that enables the continual renewal of this musical tradition. Kun-borrk is sung in a variety of different languages, reflecting the multilingualism of Bininj people in this region. Sometimes the text of a single song item may consist of two or three languages, or of fixed syllables that cannot be translated, generically referred to as ‘spirit language’ (O’Keefe, 2007). In this presentation, a Bininj song man (co-presenter) discusses the meanings of a number of song texts including mirrijpu (seagull), associated with Manangkardi language from North Goulburn Island, which is no longer spoken. The co-presenter lives in the community of Kunbarlanja, where the author recorded his songs from 2011 to 2012. In 2006 and 2007 musicologists Isabel O’Keefe and Linda Barwick recorded the co-presenter’s brother (now deceased) singing mirrijpu at Goulburn Island. This presentation compares different performances of the same song items, examining the extent to which song texts change or stay the same over time and whether recording songs affects this process. It also address the question: how does writing down song texts influence both Balanda (non-Aboriginal people) and Bininj people’s understanding and awareness of the language of this region? We will conclude by considering some of the challenges to sustaining the tradition of kun-borrk and the methods that singers such as the co-presenter are employing to ensure that their children can still sing and dance the songs of their ancestors and thereby keep their own languages and cultural expression alive and strong
    corecore