132,577 research outputs found
Peratrimera Hauser & Irwin 2005, n. gen.
No full text<i>Peratrimera</i> n. gen. (Figs. 1, 2) <p> <b>Diagnosis</b>. The genus is characterized by the long first flagellomere and three flagellomeres (Fig. 2B); the two notopleural macrosetae on the thorax (Fig. 1B); the closed wing cell m 3; the setae on R 1 and R 4+5 (Fig. 2B); the vein C ending at M 2; the absence of a lateral macrosetae on the hind coxa; the short setae on the abdomen, the elongate shape of the abdomen; and the up­curved setae on the 8th abdominal sternite of the female (Fig. 1B).</p> <p> <b>Type species</b>. <i>Peratrimera mexicana</i> <b>n. sp.,</b> by present designation.</p> <p> <b>Etymology</b>. <i>Peras</i> (Gr.) = extremity, <i>tri</i> (Gr.) = three, <i>meros</i> (Gr.) = part, division, referring to the three flagellomeres of the antenna.</p>Published as part of <i>Hauser, Martin & Irwin, Michael E., 2005, A new remarkable Xestomyzinae (Insecta, Diptera, Therevidae) genus from Mexican Amber, pp. 39-45 in Zootaxa 1008 (1008)</i> on page 4
ICD-11 and integrative diagnostics in personality disorders
No full textDas neue Diagnoseverständnis von Persönlichkeitsstörungen in der ICD-11 zielt entsprechend dem salutogeneseorientierten integrativ-prozessualen diagnostischen Vorgehen nicht auf die Veränderung von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen ab, sondern auf Beeinträchtigungen. Damit wird der diagnostische Prozess einem theragnostischen angenähert und gestaltet sich entsprechend dem Verständnis der Integrativen Therapie deskriptiv auf den phänomenologischen Manifestationsebenen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird die erneuerte Konzeption von Persönlichkeitsstörungen dem Verständnis Integrativer Diagnostik gegenübergestellt, Potentiale und Probleme der verschiedenen Konzepte beleuchtet und anhand von konkreten Beispielen verdeutlicht. Die Arbeit hat zudem zum Ziel, Implikationen für den therapeutischen Prozess durch die erneuerte Diagnostik nutzbar zu machen.The new concept in ICD-11 of diagnosing personality disorders is not aimed at changing personality traits, but at identifying impairments, in line with the salutogenesis-oriented integrative-processual diagnostic approach. This brings the diagnostic process closer to a theragnostic procedure and, in accordance with the understanding of integrative therapy, is descriptive on the phenomenological levels of manifestation. In the present work, the revised concept of personality disorders is compared with the understanding of integrative diagnostics, the potentials and problems of the various concepts are highlighted and illustrated using concrete examples. The work also sets out to make implications for the therapeutic process usable through the renewed diagnostics.https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/13-2024-hauser-n-icd-11-und-integrative-diagnostik-von-persoenlichkeitsstoerungen/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Diagnosis of personality disorders according to ICD-11. A compact overview
No full textDas neue Diagnoseverständnis von Persönlichkeitsstörungen gemäss ICD-11 zielt entsprechend dem salutogeneseorientierten integrativ-prozessualen diagnostischen Vorgehen nicht auf die Veränderung von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen ab, sondern auf Beeinträchtigungen, wird dadurch pragmatisch und leichter vermittelbar und gestaltet sich entsprechend dem integrativen Verständnis deskriptiv auf den phänomenologischen Manifestationsebenen. Die erneuerte Konzeption von Persönlichkeitsstörungen wird dem Verständnis Integrativer Diagnostik gegenübergestellt, Potentiale und Probleme werden beleuchtet und anhand von konkreten Beispielen verdeutlicht. Die Arbeit hat zudem zum Ziel, Implikationen für den therapeutischen Prozess durch die erneuerte Diagnostik nutzbar zu machen.In line with the salutogenesis-oriented integrative-processual diagnostic approach, the new diagnostic understanding of personality disorders according to ICD-11 is not aimed at changing personality traits, but at impairments caused by them. This makes the new approach to personality disorders pragmatic and easier to communicate. In accordance with the integrative understanding, is descriptive at the phenomenological levels of manifestation. In this word, the renewed conception of personality disorders is contrasted with the understanding of integrative diagnostics, potentials and problems are highlighted and illustrated with concrete examples. The work also aims to make implications for the therapeutic process usable through the renewed diagnostics.https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/09-2024-hauser-n-diagnostik-der-persoenlichkeitsstoerungen-nach-icd-11-ein-kompakter-ueberblick/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
A formal method for the de-N,N-dialkylation of Sommelet-Hauser rearrangement products
No full textSelective amine de-alkylation enables the conversion of Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement products into 2-aryl-2-bromoacetic acid derivatives. These compounds are valuable synthetic intermediates in the synthesis of α-aryl-α-amino or α-aryl-β-amino acid derivatives. The method presented herein is a formal de-N,N-dialkylation of Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement products
A formal method for the de-N,N-dialkylation of Sommelet-Hauser rearrangement products
No full textSelective amine de-alkylation enables the conversion of Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement products into 2-aryl-2-bromoacetic acid derivatives. These compounds are valuable synthetic intermediates in the synthesis of α-aryl-α-amino or α-aryl-β-amino acid derivatives. The method presented herein is a formal de-N,N-dialkylation of Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement products
Les cultures à l'école : les nouveaux enjeux Migrants-formation, N° 77, Juin 1989
No full textHauser Jacques. Les cultures à l'école : les nouveaux enjeux Migrants-formation, N° 77, Juin 1989. In: Hommes et Migrations, n°1125, octobre 1989. pp. 45-46
The aryne Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement
No full textAn aryne induced transition-metal-free and mild Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement of tertiary benzylamines for the synthesis of α-aryl amino acid derivatives in moderate to good yields is presented. Unlike the conventional Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement of ammonium salts, the methodology developed herein requires neither harsh conditions nor strong bases. Moreover, a temperature dependent switchable selectivity for the Sommelet–Hauser and Stevens [1,2] rearrangements has been observed
Spheginobaccha pamela Thompson & Hauser 2015, sp. n.
No full text<i>Spheginobaccha pamela</i> sp. n. <p>Figs 4–6</p> <p>Etymology: We here dedicate this species to Pamela [neé Usher] Stuckenberg, Brian’s devoted wife who also published on horse flies (Tabanidae). Proper name in apposition. Description:</p> <p> <i>Male</i>.</p> <p> <i>Length</i>: Body (PT), 16.3 mm; wing (PT), 10.6 mm.</p> <p> <i>Head</i>: Black except lunule more reddish brown, sparsely white pollinose, yellow pilose; broadly dichoptic; antenna reddish brown; scape and pedicel black pilose; basoflagellomere light brown; arista yellow.</p> <p> <i>Thorax</i>: Pronotum yellow, yellow pilose; propleuron black anteriorly, yellow posteriorly, yellow pilose; scutum black except dull yellow marginally, sparsely grey pollinose with dark brown pollinose medial vitta, short yellow pilose; postalar callus yellow, yellow pilose; scutellum yellow, yellow pilose; pleuron mainly dull yellow, white pilose, dark on posterior antepisternum; calypter white; halter yellow. Legs: coxae and trochanters black, pale pilose; femora black except yellow on basal ¼, pale pilose on pale areas, black pilose on dark areas; pro and meso tibia black except apical ⅓ reddish brown, black pilose; metatibia yellow on basal ½, black apically, black pilose; pro and mesotarsi brownish black except apical tarsomere reddish, black pilose. Wing: Light brown anteriorly, extending posteriorly to vein <i>R</i> and <i> R 4+5</i> and along veins, elsewhere hyaline, microtrichose except bare cell <i>cup</i> (anal), except for along its margins.</p> <p> <i>Abdomen</i>: Elongate, only very slightly petiolate, black; 1 st tergum golden pilose; 2 nd tergum mainly light brown pilose, except with apical margin broadly golden pilose and with a small apicomedial triangle patch of black pile; 3 rd tergum dull black pollinose except sparsely greyish white pollinose basolaterally, black pilose except white pilose basolateral and along lateral margin; 4 th tergum golden pilose; genitalia white pilose.</p> <p> Holotype ♂: SOUTH AFRICA: <i>KwaZulu-Natal</i>: Manguzi Forest Reserve, 26°59'32"S 32°43'25"E, 61 m, 13–17.xii.2010, Malaise trap in indigenous sand forest, A. K. Kirk-Spriggs, specimen code BMSA(D) 30059 (deposited in BMSA).</p> <p> Paratypes: 1♂ same data as holotype with specimen code BMSA(D) 30058 (deposited in USNM); 1♂ <i>KwaZulu-Natal</i>: St. Lucia Estuary, 10.ii.1974 W.W. Middlekauf (deposited in CAS).</p> <p> Remarks:As noted in the key to species below, <i>pamela</i> is most similar related to <i>guttula</i>, but differs in abdominal coloration, the male genitalia and the shape of the antenna.</p>Published as part of <i>Thompson, F. Christian & Hauser, Martin, 2015, In honor of Brian Stuckenberg: Two new Spheginobaccha species of flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the Afrotropics, pp. 769 in African Invertebrates 56 (3)</i> on pages 772-774, DOI: 10.5733/afin.056.0318, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7914911">http://zenodo.org/record/7914911</a>
Eumerus lyneborgi Ricarte & Hauser & Kinnee & Marcos-García 2020, sp. nov.
No full textRemarks on Eumerus lyneborgi sp. nov. and similar species Eumerus lyneborgi sp. nov. is similar to E. vestitus Bezzi, 1912 in body size and constitution, predominantly pollinose frons, with punctured pollinosity (females), swollen metafemur, with two ventral rows of short black spinae, one antero-apically and other postero-apical, lateral margins of terga III and IV pollinose, and tergum IV widely pollinose posteriorly. Bezzi (1912) described E. vestitus based on males and females from ‘ Guinea Portoguese’ (nowadays, Guinea-Bissau), supposedly the male and three females the authors of the present paper found in the MCSNG collection. These specimens are all labelled as ‘syntypus’ and a female has an additional label of ‘Typus’. Bezzi (1912) did not mention a holotype or type specimen for his new species in the description. Thus, according to articles 73.1.1 and 73.1.2 of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999), this ‘Typus’ is not a valid holotype and therefore all specimens are syntypes. In addition, no subsequent type designation for E. vestitus is known to the authors of the present paper. In the past, curators sometimes labelled arbitrarily as ‘Typus’ the best looking specimen within the type series (M.A. Alonso-Zarazaga in lit.), and this is likely to be the case for this ‘Typus’ specimen. Thus, lectotype designation is possible for this nominal species in order to stabilise this species concept, especially because it is a mixed type series and the newly described species in this paper is similar to E. vestitus. Thus, we here designate the male specimen as lectotype (Fig. 9). All other specimens (females) become automatically paralectotypes (Figs 10, 11). All specimens of the type series, except for one are recognised to be conspecific. The outlier specimen (female paralectotype) has (1) denser and longer eye pilosity (eye with very short and scattered pile in the other two females) (Fig. 10C, D), (2) slight but obvious pollinosity surrounding posterior ocelli (this same area is shiny or nearly so in the other two females), (3) individual dots of frontal pollinosity very small (larger in the other females) (Fig. 10A, C), (4) basoflagellomere tapering dorsally for the apical two thirds (for the apical half or less, in the other two females) (Fig. 10C, D), (5) metatibia bumped ventrally (less bumped, tending to straight, in the other two females), (6) apex of metatibia without short black spinae (apex of metatibia with two short black spinae in the other two females) (Fig. 11). This outlier female is similar to the female of E. obliquus (Fabricius 1805) (widespread in Africa) and E. figurans Walker, 1859 (not recorded from Africa). However, it differs from that of E. obliquus in the pollinose vertex (broadly shiny in E. obliquus), wide pollinose posterior margin of scutellum (much narrower to almost absent in E. obliquus), narrow diagonal vittae of terga III and IV (wider in E. obliquus), and shiny posterior margin of tergum IV (extensively pollinose in E. obliquus); and differs from the female of E. figurans in the pollinose vertex and occiput (vertex and occiput shiny in E. figurans), the densely and homogeneously pollinose frons (frons with a medial line of sparser pollinosity in E. figurans), and the short spinae of the anteroapical row of metafemur (longer spinae in E. figurans). The outlier specimen did not key out with Lyneborg’s manuscript key to the Afrotropical species of Eumerus, and might represent an undescribed sister species of E. vestitus. However, we decided not to describe it as a separate taxon due to the absence of other specimens, including males with conspecific morphology. Additional examined material of other Eumerus species. Type series of the nominal species, Eumerus vestitus Bezzi, 1912. Lectotype: 1³, GUINEA PORTOGUESE, Rio Cassine, XII.1899 – IV.1900. L. Fea (part of the date crossed out as indicated) / SYNTYPUS ³ Eumerus vestitus Bezzi, 1912 (on pink label). Paralectotypes: 1♀, GUINEA POR- TOGUESE, Rio Cassine, XII.1899 – IV.1900. L. Fea (part of the date crossed out as indicated) / vestitus Bezzi / TYPUS (printed in red) / Eumerus vestitus n. sp. (handwritten on a pink label; ‘ n. sp. ’ is an interpretation of the actual label lettering) / SYNTYPUS ♀ Eumerus vestitus Bezzi, 1912 (on pink label) / Museo Civico di Genova; 2♀, GUINEA PORTOGUESE, Rio Cassine, XII.1899 – IV.1900. L. Fea (part of the date crossed out as indicated) / SYNTYPUS ♀ Eumerus vestitus Bezzi, 1912 (on pink label) / Museo Civico di Genova [MCSNG]. The male syntype lacks the antennae and the right prolegs, and the head is pasted to thorax in its original position. The female syntype labelled as ‘typus’ lacks the left basoflagellomere, while another female lacks the left metatarsus. There were specimens from Egypt, donated by Becker to Bezzi and found by this latter author that they were erroneously identified as E. obliquus, mentioned in the original description, which we could not locate. Additional material of Eumerus vesti-tus: 2³, 1♀, Egypt, Cairo, Gizera, 24.ix.1992, leg. M. Hauser [CSCA]; 1³, Egypt, Luxor, Westbank of Nile river 25.694N 32,628E, 1.iv.2018 leg Schmid-Egger [CSCA]; 1³, Tunisia, Monastir, 15km S Sousse, 28.vi.1994, leg. M. Hauser (first record of E. vestitus from Tunisia) [CSCA]. Eumerus obliquus: AFRICA. 1♀, ‘Cap. B. Spei.’ [South Africa, Cape of Good Hope], Coll. H. Loew, obliquus F (hand written); 1³, Africa, Coll. H. Loew [ZMB]; 1♀ [published in Marcos-García et al. (2013)], Île de la Réunion (France), Les Avirons, 24.vi.2010, Leg.: N. Estela Ribera, Det. as E. obliquus by A. Ricarte & M.A. Marcos-García in 2010 (CEUA00105083) [CEUA]; 1³, 2♀, Mozambique, Sofala Prov. Gorongosa Park, small lake, 18°56’39»S 34°26’35»E, 300m, ex Malaise, 19–30.iv.2015 leg. M. Hauser & A. Rung [CSCA]; 1³, Zambia Southern Prov., Livingston, 17.842 S 15.857 E, 960m, 1.v.2016, leg M. Hauser & CJ Borkent [CSCA]; 1³, Zambia, Northern Prov. 8.8 km WSW Kakumbi, S Luangwa NP, 22–26.iv. 2016, 525m, 13.115 S 31.726 E, Malaise trap, leg. M. Hauser, CJ Borkent & DM Ndalamei [CSCA]; 1³, Mali 30 km N Bamako, 20.vii.1991, leg. M. Schwarz [CSCA]; 1³, Ghana, Northern Region, Mole National Park, 165m, 09°15’33»N 01°51’43»W, Malaise trap, 28–30.iv.2014 leg. S. Gaimari & M. Hauser [CSCA]; 1³, Tunisia, Monastir, 15km S Sousse, 28.vi. 1994, leg. M. Hauser [CSCA]. AUSTRA-LIA. 1♀ with puparium, Palmwoods, nr Nambour, Qld, C. Hayward, emerged 17.v.1986, ex rotting guava infested with larvae of Dacus tryoni (UQIC Reg #94996) [CSCA]. EUROPE. 1♀, Spain (mainland), Alicante, San Juan, 01.iv.2020, Leg. M.A. Marcos; 1♀ [published in Ricarte et al. (2008)], Spain, Balearic Islands, Mallorca, Ses Salines, P/ 29.x.2005, Leg.: M.A. Marcos-García (#6844), Det. as E. obliquus by A. Ricarte in 2006 (CEUA00084841). Eumerus obliquus is widespread all over Africa, also found in the Canary and various Mediterranean islands, as well as in mainland Europe: Spain (first records in the present paper), southern France and Italy (Speight 2020). This species is also introduced in Australia and South America (Garcete-Barrett et al. 2020). A female of Eumerus punctifrons Loew, 1857 with the following data: Tunis, 62285 [ZMB]. Photos of the holotype of Eumerus figurans Walker, 1859 at the Natural History Museum, London, available at https://www.nhm.ac.uk/.Published as part of Ricarte, Antonio, Hauser, Martin, Kinnee, Scott & Marcos-García, Ángeles, 2020, A new Eumerus hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) from Namibia and South Africa with notes on similar species, pp. 493-508 in Zootaxa 4890 (4) on pages 502-503, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4890.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/430650
M. Hauser et la Micoque
No full textObermaier Hugo. M. Hauser et la Micoque. In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 10, 1908, n°1. pp. 85-88
- …
