1,721,460 research outputs found
The World Loanword Database (WOLD) 2009
No full text<p>Haspelmath, Martin & Tadmor, Uri (eds.) 2009. World Loanword Database. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wold.clld.org)</p>This deposit contains both, the data of WOLD as well as the software serving http://wold.clld.org. Robert Forkel is author of the latter
Zur Grammatikalisierung von Indefinitpronomina
No full textThis paper is the author's first publication on indefinite pronouns, taking a grammaticalization perspective. It was superseded by Chapter 6 of his 1997 book "Indefinite pronouns" (https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30819).
Haspelmath, Martin. 1991. Zur Grammatikalisierung von Indefinitpronomina. In: Boretzky, Norbert & Enninger, Werner & Jeßing, Benedikt & Stolz, Thomas (eds.) Sprachwandel und seine Prinzipien. Beiträge zum 8. Bochum-Essener Kolloquium vom 19.10. – 21.10. 1990 an der Ruhruniversität Bochum. (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 14.) Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer, 103-125
WALS Online, July 2014, with unfreeze support.
No full text<p>Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info)</p>
Method and theory in comparative grammar: Measurement uniformity vs. building block uniformity
No full textIn this presentation, I contrast two approaches to worldwide grammatical comparisons: One is based on “measurement uniformity” and a clear separation between an autonomous comparative method and explanatory theories, while the second is based on the idea that languages are made from the same building blocks, so that the explanatory theory (i.e. the hypothesized uniform building blocks) is not autonomous from the method for comparison. The “measurement” metaphor is not widely used in comparative grammar research yet, but I use it to emphasize the value of distinguishing strictly between method and theory. I illustrate this conceptual distinction with generalizations from my recent work on differential argument coding and other kinds of differential coding (Haspelmath 2021a; 2021b), which require uniform comparative concepts (uniform measurement), but which are based on an explanatory theory (the efficiency theory of asymmetric coding) that makes no reference to innate building blocks. I also note that the distinction between measurement and building block uniformity is more basic than the distinction between “functionalism and formalism” (e.g. Bošković 2021).
References
Bošković, Željko. 2021. Formalism and, not vs, functionalism. LingBuzz. (https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006337)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2021a. Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics 59(1). 123–174. (doi:10.1515/ling-2020-0252)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2021b. Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics 57(3). 605-633 (doi:10.1017/S0022226720000535) (https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004531
Glottolog database 2.3
No full text<p>Hammarström, Harald & Forkel, Robert & Haspelmath, Martin & Nordhoff, Sebastian. 2014. Glottolog 2.3. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://glottolog.org)</p>
glottolog/glottolog: Glottolog database 4.6 as CLDF
No full textHammarström, Harald & Forkel, Robert & Haspelmath, Martin & Bank, Sebastian. 2022. Glottolog 4.6. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at https://glottolog.org
- …
