1,721,101 research outputs found

    The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena (TInCAP)

    No full text
    The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena is a collection of examples and annotations of ambiguities from an interdisciplinary perspective. The annotations make it possible to (i) compare ambiguous examples from various different disciplines including linguistics, literary studies, rhetoric, law, theology, media studies and others, based on the research agenda of the graduate school GRK 1808: "Ambiguity: Production and Perception". Publications: Hartmann, Jutta M., Corinna Sauter, Gesa Schole, Wiltrud Wagner, Peter Gietz, and Susanne Winkler (2016). "TInCAP – ein interdisziplinäres Korpus zu Ambiguitätsphänomenen." Konferenzabstract Leipzig, DHd 2016. 461–63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3679331 Hartmann, Jutta M., Lisa Ebert, Gesa Schole, Wiltrud Wagner & Susanne Winkler. 2023. Annotating Ambiguity Across Disciplines: The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena (TInCAP). In Matthias Bauer & Angelika Zirker (eds.), Strategies of ambiguity (Routledge studies in twentieth century literature), 322-. New York NY: Routledge. doi des Buches: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003298083&nbsp

    The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena (TInCAP)

    No full text
    The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena is a collection of examples and annotations of ambiguities from an interdisciplinary perspective. The annotations make it possible to (i) compare ambiguous examples from various different disciplines including linguistics, literary studies, rhetoric, law, theology, media studies and others, based on the research agenda of the graduate school GRK 1808: "Ambiguity: Production and Perception". Publications: Hartmann, Jutta M., Corinna Sauter, Gesa Schole, Wiltrud Wagner, Peter Gietz, and Susanne Winkler (2016). "TInCAP – ein interdisziplinäres Korpus zu Ambiguitätsphänomenen." Konferenzabstract Leipzig, DHd 2016. 461–63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3679331 Hartmann, Jutta M., Lisa Ebert, Gesa Schole, Wiltrud Wagner & Susanne Winkler. 2023. Annotating Ambiguity Across Disciplines: The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena (TInCAP). In Matthias Bauer & Angelika Zirker (eds.), Strategies of ambiguity (Routledge studies in twentieth century literature), 322-. New York NY: Routledge. doi des Buches: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003298083&nbsp

    The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena (TInCAP)

    No full text
    The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena is a collection of examples and annotations of ambiguities from an interdisciplinary perspective. The annotations make it possible to (i) compare ambiguous examples from various different disciplines including linguistics, literary studies, rhetoric, law, theology, media studies and others, based on the research agenda of the graduate school GRK 1808: "Ambiguity: Production and Perception". Publications: Hartmann, Jutta M., Corinna Sauter, Gesa Schole, Wiltrud Wagner, Peter Gietz, and Susanne Winkler (2016). "TInCAP – ein interdisziplinäres Korpus zu Ambiguitätsphänomenen." Konferenzabstract Leipzig, DHd 2016. 461–63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3679331 Hartmann, Jutta M., Lisa Ebert, Gesa Schole, Wiltrud Wagner & Susanne Winkler. 2023. Annotating Ambiguity Across Disciplines: The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena (TInCAP). In Matthias Bauer & Angelika Zirker (eds.), Strategies of ambiguity (Routledge studies in twentieth century literature), 322-. New York NY: Routledge. doi des Buches: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003298083&nbsp

    Geschlechterreflektierte Professionalisierung – Geschlecht und Professionalität in pädagogischen Berufen. Eine Einführung

    Full text link
    Der Beitrag zeigt die Zusammenhänge zwischen Geschlecht und Professionalität in Bezug auf pädagogische Handlungsfelder auf. Hierzu werden gängige Professionalisierungetheorien einander gegenübergestellt und in eine Relation zu älteren wie neuen Ansätzen der Geschlechterforschung gesetzt. Die historische Verschränkung der Diskurse ist genauso Thema wie aktuelle Entwicklungen: Widersprüche werden aufgezeigt, aber auch Korrespondenzen sowie Transformationen im Spannungsverhältnis von Theorie, Politik und Praxis

    Hartmann, Jutta / Messerschmidt, Astrid / Thon, Christine (Hrsg.): Queertheoretische Perspektiven auf Bildung - Pädagogische Kritik der Heteronormativität. Jahrbuch Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung in der Erziehungswissenschaft 13/2017. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Barbara Budrich 2017 (192 S.) [Rezension]

    Full text link
    Rezension von: Hartmann, Jutta / Messerschmidt, Astrid / Thon, Christine (Hrsg.): Queertheoretische Perspektiven auf Bildung - Pädagogische Kritik der Heteronormativität. Jahrbuch Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung in der Erziehungswissenschaft 13/2017. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Barbara Budrich 2017 (192 S.; ISBN 978-3-8474-2061-3; 28,00 EUR)

    Up or down? Resolving agreement in copular sentences

    No full text
    These files contain the anonymised raw data from 7 experiments developed and run for the BA-funded project "Up or Down? Resolving agreement in copular clauses. There are 2 sets of data - one from a production task and one from a grammaticality judgment task - for each of Dutch, German, and Faroese. There is 1 set of data from a grammaticality judgment task for Icelandic. The study investigated possible patterns of agreement in copular sentences in which there were two nominals different in either person or number or both (e.g. "The source of the rumour was/were your neighbours"; "My only hope is/are you"). The particular focus of the study was the possible contrasts between agreement with 3rd person pronouns and non-3rd person pronouns ("The problem is/are they" vs "The problem is/are you"). In all of the languages investigated in the study (Dutch, German, Faroese, Icelandic) prior research indicated that at least some speakers produce agreement for number with the second noun phrase ("The source of the rumour were your neighbours") in contrast to English, where agreement with the first noun phrase is strongly preferred. What this study adds is information about possibilities for person agreement.README.txt A summary of the contents of all the data files FAR01Prod.csv Data from the production (cloze task) study on Faroese agreement FAR01Rating.csv Data from the rating study ("thermometer rating") on Faroese agreement GER02Prod.csv Data from the production (cloze task) study on German agreement GER02Rating.csv Data from the rating study ("thermometer rating") on German agreement ICE01Rating.csv Data from the rating study ("thermometer rating") on Icelandic agreement NL02Prod.csv Data from the production (cloze task) study on Dutch agreement NL02Rating.csv Data from the rating study ("thermometer rating") on Dutch agreemen
    corecore