1,721,012 research outputs found
and I — lingual views SEM images of gold palladium coated epoxy casts. Scale = 0.5 mm in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)
No full textand I — lingual views SEM images of gold palladium coated epoxy casts. Scale = 0.5 mmPublished as part of Harrison, David L. & Hooker, Jeremy J., 2010, Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae), pp. 1-18 in Acta Chiropterologica 12 (1) on page 15, DOI: 10.3161/150811010X504554, http://zenodo.org/record/394454
Late Middle Eocene Bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, Southern England with Description of a New Species of<i>Archaeonycteris</i>(Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)
No full textHarrison, David L., Hooker, Jeremy J. (2010): Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae). Acta Chiropterologica 12 (1): 1-18, DOI: 10.3161/150811010X50455
FIG. 5. Creechbarrow bats. Stehlinia quercyi HZM 4.36362. Right C1 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)
No full textFIG. 5. Creechbarrow bats. Stehlinia quercyi HZM 4.36362. Right C1 in A — distal, B — lingual, C — buccal and D — occlusal views. Arrow indicates mesiolingual cusp. Scale = 1 mm. Microchiroptera gen. et sp. indet. HZM 22.34774. Right trigonid of lower molar in E — buccal, F — distal, G — lingual and H — occlusal views. Rhinolophidae gen. et sp. indet. HZM 2.38159. RightPublished as part of Harrison, David L. & Hooker, Jeremy J., 2010, Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae), pp. 1-18 in Acta Chiropterologica 12 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.3161/150811010X504554, http://zenodo.org/record/394454
F. 4. Pseudorhinolophus schlosseri, Creechbarrow. HZM 1.31792. Left M2 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)
No full textF. 4. Pseudorhinolophus schlosseri, Creechbarrow. HZM 1.31792. Left M2: A — occlusal and B — oblique distal views. HZM IG 3.38170. Left M1/2 in C — distal, D — lingual, E — buccal and F — occlusal views. Rhinolophidae gen. et sp. indet. HZM 1.31222.Published as part of Harrison, David L. & Hooker, Jeremy J., 2010, Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae), pp. 1-18 in Acta Chiropterologica 12 (1) on page 9, DOI: 10.3161/150811010X504554, http://zenodo.org/record/394454
A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country
No full textBumrungsri, Sara, Harrison, David L., Satasook, Chutamas, Prajukjitr, Amorn, Thong-Aree, Siriporn, Bates, Paul J. J. (2006): A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country. Acta Chiropterologica 8 (2): 325-359, DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2006)8[325:arobri]2.0.co;
FIG. 2 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)
No full textFIG. 2. Archaeonycteris relicta sp. nov., Creechbarrow, maxillary cheek teeth. HZM 1.31799. Right M1/2: A — occlusal, B — lingual, C — mesial and D — buccal views. HZM 7.38324. Left M1/2: E — occlusal, F — buccal, G — mesial and H — lingual views. HZM 16.31548. Part protocone lobe right M3: I — occlusal and J — mesial views. HZM 3.35865. Protocone lobe right M1/2: K — mesial and L — oblique views.Published as part of Harrison, David L. & Hooker, Jeremy J., 2010, Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae), pp. 1-18 in Acta Chiropterologica 12 (1) on page 4, DOI: 10.3161/150811010X504554, http://zenodo.org/record/394454
records are indicated with lines A–A in A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country
No full textrecords are indicated with lines A–A (1898–1917) and B–B (1972–1988)Published as part of Bumrungsri, Sara, Harrison, David L., Satasook, Chutamas, Prajukjitr, Amorn, Thong-Aree, Siriporn & Bates, Paul J. J., 2006, A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country, pp. 325-359 in Acta Chiropterologica 8 (2) on page 352, DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2006)8[325:arobri]2.0.co;2, http://zenodo.org/record/394459
FIG. 3. A in A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country
No full textFIG. 3. A cumulative graph showing the number of bat species recorded from Thailand from 1800 to 2006. Date of publication is indicated with a diamond. The two periods which saw the greatest number of new country records are indicated with lines A–A (1898–1917) and B–B (1972–1988)Published as part of Bumrungsri, Sara, Harrison, David L., Satasook, Chutamas, Prajukjitr, Amorn, Thong-Aree, Siriporn & Bates, Paul J. J., 2006, A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country, pp. 325-359 in Acta Chiropterologica 8 (2) on page 352, DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2006)8[325:arobri]2.0.co;2, http://zenodo.org/record/394459
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
