1,725,447 research outputs found

    "Why don’t you give it a try?" : die Stipendiaten Harpreet Cholia und Majid Moradmand zur Situation internationaler Doktoranden an der Goethe-Universität

    No full text
    Derzeit kommen 28 % aller 1.151 GRADEDoktorandinnen und -Doktoranden aus dem Ausland. 27 – 33 % internationale Promovierende erreichten ihren Abschluss in den Jahren 2010 – 2012 an der Goethe-Universität – deutschlandweit liegt ihr Anteil bei 14 %. Die britische Geisteswissenschaftlerin Harpreet Cholia und der iranische Naturwissenschaftler Majid Moradmand stehen kurz vor dem Abschluss ihrer Dissertationen

    World Alzheimer’s Day: The Need to Spread Awareness

    Full text link
    Short Commentray on the Occasion of World Alzheimer’s Day by Dr. Harpreet Grewal, Professor & Head (Unit-II), Department of Dentistry, UCMS & GTB Hospital, Delhi-110095 &nbsp

    Fertility and Assisted Reproductive Technology in liver disorders

    No full text
    No abstract available

    Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Two New and Two Already Known Species of the Genus Pallisentis (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae) from India with an Update in Key to the Species

    No full text
    Rana, Khushboo, Kaur, Harpreet (2023): Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Two New and Two Already Known Species of the Genus Pallisentis (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae) from India with an Update in Key to the Species. Zootaxa 5352 (4): 577-593, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.8, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore