121 research outputs found
Therapist\u27s experience of psychotherapy relationship through the lens of attachment theory
Get PDFV pričujočem delu se avtorica loteva raziskovanja terapevtovega doživljanja terapevtskega odnosa in sicer skozi prizmo navezanosti. Teoretični uvod tako predstavlja podrobno predstavitev teorije navezanosti od Bowlbyja naprej. Avtorica pregleda zgodovino koncepta kot tudi njegov razvoj in etiologijo. Drugi del teoretičnega uvoda je sestavljen iz predstavitve koncepta terapevtskega delovnega odnosa in njegove implikacije za terapevtsko delo. Avtorica se znova poglobi v razumevanje koncepta in skuša slediti njegovemu razvoju. Delo nato preide na raziskovalni del.
Avtorico je zanimalo, kako terapevti doživljajo terapevtski odnos skozi lečo navezanosti. Za ta namen je terapevtski odnos razdelila na tri faze – fazo prednavezanosti, ki jo zaznamuje vzpostavljanje kontakta in učenje pravil terapevtskega dela, sledi ji faza oblikovanja navezanosti, kjer je dinamika že utečena, klienti pa opažajo prve spremembe v svojem življenju, in zadnja faza, torej faza navezanosti, ki jo oblikuje visoka stopnja zaupanja, jasna komunikacija med klientom in terapevtom in dobra delovna aliansa. Avtorica je za namen naloge intervjuvala osem terapevtov in podatke, pridobljene v teh intervjujih analizirala s pomočjo kvalitativne metode fenomenološke raziskave. Ugotovitve so pokazale, da se doživljanje terapevtov v veliki meri sklada z do sedaj aktualno teorijo. V fazi prednavezanosti so terapevti poročali o tem, da se odnos šele oblikuje, zaupanje vzpostavlja, komunikacija še usklajuje. V fazi oblikovanja navezanosti terapevti poročajo o naraščajočem zaupanju in opažanju sprememb in v zadnji fazi poročajo o močni navezanosti in z rastjo odnosa vedno bolj enakovreden odnos med terapevtom in klientom. To je tudi obdobje, ko klient in terapevt načrtujeta zaključek.
Raziskovalno delo je avtorici ponudilo vpogled v globoko doživljanje terapevtskih odnosov s strani terapevta, spoznala je izzive, s katerimi se terapevti srečujejo pri svojem delu, pa tudi dobrobiti terapevtskega dela. V svojem delu je avtorica izpostavila tudi pomanjkanje informacij s področja raziskovanja terapevtske perspektive.In the current master thesis, the author is exploring a therapists’ perception of psychotherapy process through the lens of attachment. The theoretical part consists of precise description of ontogeny of the attachment theory from his beginner, John Bowlby. The author follows the history and etiology of the mentioned concept. The other part of the master thesis consists of presentation of the working alliance concept and its indication for therapeutic work. Author tries to get an overall understanding about the concept, its origins and current implications.
In the current master thesis, the author was interested in therapists’ perception of psychotherapy relationship through the attachment perspective. To enquire about it she divided the attachment process on three main stages – the preattachment stage, characterized by first contact and establishment of communication, second stage, namely attachment in the making stage, where the trust and therapy framework is already established and clients can see first changes, and last, third phase that is the attachment phase, where therapist and clients have high level of trust, good communication and good working alliance. Author interviewed eight therapists and analyzed the information from the interviews via phenomenological research.
Results have shown that the way therapists from the research see their relationships folds well with the current theory from the field. In the preattachment stage the therapist spoke about the way the relationship has yet to be built, the trust has yet to be gained and communication is still on shaky grounds. In the second, attachment in the making phase, therapists observe deeper trust, clients start seeing changes in their lives and in the last, attachment phase they describe the relationship as of one of strong attachment. With continuation of the relationship the relationship itself become more of an equal one and is, as such, slowly transcending into the conclusion phase.
The research work enabled the author to see the depth of the therapists’ experiencing of the relationships they make with their clients, she get to know the challenges of the therapeutic relationships and also the benefits of it. As a conclusion, the author exposes the lack of information available on research done of exploring the therapists’ perspective
A secure and efficient inventory management system for disasters
No full textOver the last three decades, disasters worldwide claimed more than 3 million lives and adversely affected the lives of at least 1 billion people (Noji, 1997). Regarding the threats posed by these disasters, emergency disaster management has emerged as a vital tool to reduce the harm and alleviate the suffering these disasters can cause to their victims. A significant task of planners involved in emergency disaster management is planning for and satisfying the vital needs of the people located in emergency shelters such as the Superdome in New Orleans. This thesis proposes a novel and comprehensive framework for the development of a humanitarian emergency inventory management system based on the real-time tracking of emergency supplies and demands through the integration of emerging technologies such as Radio Frequency Identification Devices (RFID) for commodity tracking and logistics. The novelty of this thesis is that, for the first time in the emergency inventory management field, the proposed approach combines an offline planning strategy with online control techniques in a unified framework. Within this framework, the offline planning problem is solved by the stochastic humanitarian inventory management approach, whereas the online modeling strategies include the application of neural network-based functional approximation, simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA), and continuous time model predictive control (CMPC) techniques. Unlike previous studies, the flexibility of the proposed inventory management and control model allows the application of the developed mathematical model to extreme events making online real-time tracking possible. Realistic case studies built using information available from past disasters are used to examine the differences in inventory strategies for different types of disasters based on the impact area and duration of the extreme event. The proposed methodology is also capable of representing and understanding real-life cases where uncertainty and limitations on the inventory levels and flow of supplies can be modeled by introducing different levels of stochasticity and real-life constraints. The overall findings of this thesis have pointed out that the proposed integrated framework can be efficiently used for emergency inventory planning and inventory control during disaster relief operations without ignoring the real-world uncertainties, fluctuations, and constraints of disaster conditions.Ph. D.Includes bibliographical referencesIncludes vitaby Eren Erman Ozguve
Corrigendum for: Patorani local knowledge system in fisheries resources conservation education in Galesong District South Sulawesi
No full textWe sincerely express our apology for the changes in the author list in the article entitled Patorani local knowledge system in fisheries resources conservation education in Galesong District South Sulawesi. This article was published on DOI: 10.17977/um017v28i12023p52-63, with the authors list consisting of Hasriyanti, Rusdi, Alonge Titus Adeyemi, Michel E. D. Chaves, and Erman Syarif. However, Michel E. D. Chaves issue a complaint regarding his involvement during the research and paper completion. He did not agree to the inclusion of his name in the author list. We have contacted the corresponding author for confirmation. Besides, the co-author has also confirmed the mistake in the writing of one of the author’s names, Alonge Titus Adeyemi, which should be Titus Adeyemi Alonge. The corresponding author has submitted a letter of author contribution signed by Hasriyanti, Rusdi, Titus Adeyemi Alonge, and Erman Syarif. The original article has been revised, and reasonable effort should be made to remove all references to this article
Stigmaeus longiclipeatus Doğan & Doğan & Erman 2017, sp. nov.
No full textStigmaeus longiclipeatus sp. nov. Female (n = 1) (Figs. 24, 25). Body elongated. Integument striated except for shields. Length of body 401, width 189. Gnathosoma 58. Leg I 142, leg II 109, leg III 117, leg IV 130. Dorsum of idiosoma. Most dorsal idiosomal shields ornamented. Central area of propodosomal shield reticulated, without vacuoles, but margins of shield with vacuoles. Central area of central shield reticulated, shield with vacuoles marginally, other shields only with vacuoles except intercalary and suranal shields smooth. Prodorsum with a large shield medially and two small shields laterally. Apodemal marking present in the center of propodosomal shield. Posterior of propodosomal shield with tubercles. Propodosomal shield bearing three pairs of setae (vi, ve, sci), but eyes and post-ocular bodies absent. sce on minute individual platelets. c 1 and d 1 on central shield. Median zonal shields divided, candle flame-like, bearing setae e 1. Marginal and lateral zonal shields longitudinally elongated and bearing setae d 2 and e 2, respectively. Intercalary shields small, divided and bearing f 1. Suranal shield divided, with three pairs of setae (h 1-3), h 2 longer than others. Humeral shields located ventrolaterally, smooth, and carrying setae c 2. Length of marginal shield about as long as central shield. Lateral zonal shields elongated with setae e 2 located anteriorly on shield. Dorsum with 14 pairs of setae (setae h 3 present). All dorsal idiosomal setae smooth. Lengths of dorsal idiosomal setae: vi 15, ve 20, sci 20, sce 28, c 1 18, c 2 41, d 1 18, d 2 21, e 1 17, e 2 20, f 1 21, h 1 23, h 2 30, h 3 14. Distances between dorsal idiosomal setae: vi - vi 29, ve -ve 42, vi -ve 22, sci -sci 58, ve -sci 35, sce -sce 136, sci -sce 36, c 1- c 1 29, d 2- d 2 118, c 1- d 1 54, c 1- d 2 59, d 1- d 1 24, d 2- d 1 44, e 2- e 2 102, d 2- e 2 67, d 1 - e 1 59, d 1- e 2 38, e 1- e 1 32, e 2- e 1 36, f 1- f 1 36, e 1- f 1 31, e 2- f 1 50, f 1- h 1 53, f 1- h 2 54, f 1- h 3 50, h 1- h 1 26, h 2- h 2 56, h 3- h 3 72, h 1- h 2 11. Venter of idiosoma. All ventral shields smooth. Coxisternal shields divided at midline and bearing three pairs of intercoxal setae (1a, 3a, 4a). Aggenital shields divided, bearing four pairs of aggenital setae (ag 1-4), but ag 1 not on shield on right side. Genital and anal shields contiguous, bearing two pairs of genital (g 1, 2) and three pairs of pseudanal setae (ps 1-3). Lengths and distances of setae: 1a 11, 3a 14, 4a 10, 1a -1a 32, 3a -3a 30, 4a -4a 29, ag 1 8, ag 2 10, ag 3 8, ag 4 11, ps 1 29, ps 2 27, ps 3 17. Gnathosoma. Chelicerae 64, palp 50. Subcapitulum with two pairs of adoral setae (or 1,2) and two pairs of subcapitular setae (m, n). Lengths and distances of subcapitular setae: m 9, n 10, m -m 19 n -n 17, m -n 7. Legs. Leg segments without reticulation. Counts of setae and solenidia on legs I–IV: coxae 2–2–2–2, trochanters 1–1–2–1, femora 4–4–3–2, genua 5(+1κ)–5–1–2, tibiae 5(+1φ+1φρ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ), tarsi 13(+1ω)–9(+1ω)–7(+1ω)–7(+1ω). Male and immature stages. Unknown. Etymology. The species name longiclipeatus is a combination of the Latin words clipeatus (shield) and longus (long), referring to the long marginal and lateral zonal shield on the dorsum of the body. Type material. Holotype female, from litter under Prunus sp., 40° 27' 14''N, 39° 27' 16''E, 1378 m.a.s.l., 25 November 2014, Harşit Valley, TURKEY. Remarks. Stigmaeus longiclipeatus sp. nov. closely resembles S. ladanae Nazari, Khanjani & Kamali, 2012 in that the marginal and lateral zonal shields are elongated, h 3 is present, aggenital shield is divided, four pairs of aggenital setae are present, setal formulae of femora I–IV: 4–4–3–2; but it differs from the latter by suranal shield divided in S. longiclipeatus vs. entire in S. ladanae, apodemal marking present in new species vs. absent in the latter, genu III with 1 seta in the new species vs. 2 setae in S. ladanae, coxisternal, aggenital, genital, anal shields and leg segments smooth in the new species whereas reticulated in S. ladanae (Nazari et al. 2012). Despite being represented by a single specimen, we consider that none of these character states is subject to any intraspecific variation in the Stigmaeidae. That is, no variation is ever noted for the division of the suranal shield, presence or absence of apodemal markings and the number of genual setae. Therefore, this single specimen must represent a new species. Data on morphological variation in these mites are scattered in some papers concerning the taxonomy on this group (Akyol 2011; Doğan et al. 2015a, b, 2016; Dilkaraoğlu et al. 2016a, b; Bingül & Doğan 2017; Bingül et al. 2017; Koç & Poyraz Tınartaş 2017). They mentioned some asymmetries and numerical variations on genitals, aggenitals, some dorsal and ventral body setae, and differences in length and shape of some body setae in the Stigmaeidae. One minor asymmetric morphological variation in this species is noted: ag 1 is not situated on the same shield as the others on right side. This observed character variation, occurring only on one side, may be considered as a bilateral asymmetric anomaly.Published as part of Doğan, Sibel, Doğan, Salih & Erman, Orhan, 2017, Description of five new species of the genus Stigmaeus Koch (Acari: Raphignathoidea: Stigmaeidae) from Turkey, pp. 451-478 in Zootaxa 4276 (4) on pages 471-473, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4276.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/80781
Pengaruh Pembelajaran IPA terhadap Keterampilan Teknologi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas di Sumatera Barat
Get PDFPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tahap keterampilan teknologi siswa berdasarkan perspektif siswa, membandingkan keterampilan teknologi berdasarkan lokasi tempat tinggal siswa, selain itu juga mengkaji sumbangan proses pembelajaran IPA terhadap keterampilan teknologi siswa. Sejumlah 449 orang siswa telah memberi respons terhadap instrumen penelitian. Responden penelitian ditentukan secara proportional sampling mengikut zona di Sumatera Barat. Analisis deskriptif dan analisis inferensi (Ujian regresi berganda). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tahap keterampilan teknologi siswa berada pada tahap tinggi berdasarkan tempat tinggal. Tiga dari variabel bebas yaitu proses pembelajaran IPA memberi sumbangan terhadap keterampilan teknologi siswa yaitu sebanyak 27.7 persen. Variabel tersebut adalah pembelajaran di laboratorium sebanyak 20.4 persen, pembelajaran IPA di kelas sebanyak 5.7 persen serta literasi IPA sebanyak 1.6 persen. Implikasi penelitian adalah ditujukan kepada pembelajaran di laboratorium dan pembelajaran IPA di kelas perlu rancangan yang dapat membangkitkan keterampilan teknologi disamping itu literasi IPA juga perlu dorongan dari orang tua dan guru, sesuai dengan perkembangan akademik siswa
Knowledge, Attitudes and Skills of Science Teachers Regarding ICT in West Sumatra
Get PDFThe objectives of this research were to study the differences in teachers’ knowledge of ICT based on schools’ location and teachers’ working experience, and to observe the relationship between teachers’ skills and attitudes about ICT. Participants were science teachers who worked in West Sumatra and purposive sampling was used. Data were analyzed using t-test and one-way ANOVA, and correlation product moment assessment was also employed. There was a significant difference between the knowledge of science teachers who taught in urban vs. rural areas (t = 3.15, p = 0.002); teachers who taught in urban areas had more knowledge about ICT compared with those who taught in rural areas. Moreover, there were differences in science teachers’ knowledge about ICT depending on their working experiences (t = 1.82, p = 0.07). Science teachers’ attitude about ICT had a weak and positive correlation with their skills in utilizing ICT. It can be concluded that prerequisites for learning science with the use of ICT are computer hardware, internet access, and training facilities in order to improve teachers’ knowledge on ICT, particularly experienced teachers.
Keywords: ICT knowledge, ICT skills, science teachers, school location, work experienc
Stigmaeus fimus Doğan & Doğan & Erman 2017, sp. nov.
No full text<i>Stigmaeus fimus</i> sp. nov. <p> <i>Female</i> (<i>n</i> = 5) (Figs. 6–8). Length of body 680 (657–677), width 456 (420–450). Gnathosoma 139 (138–147). Leg I 315 (317–333), leg II 278 (258–284), leg III 283 (265–296), leg IV 291 (277–302).</p> <p> <i>Dorsum of idiosoma.</i> All dorsal shields polygonally reticulated, distinctly visible on both central and lateral margins of dorsal shields. Propodosomal shield triangular and bearing setae <i>vi</i>, <i>ve</i> and <i>sci</i>. A pair of <i>pob</i> present, 60 (58–64) in diameter. Eyes and apodemal marking absent. <i>sce</i> on minute platelets laterally. <i>c</i> 1 and <i>d</i> 1 on central shield. <i>d</i> 2 located on marginal shield. <i>e</i> 1 on divided median zonal shields. <i>e</i> 2 located on lateral zonal shields. Intercalary shield divided and transversely elongated, and bearing setae <i>f</i> 1. Suranal shield undivided and bearing two pairs of setae, <i>h</i> 3 absent. Humeral shields placed on lateral body, having setae <i>c</i> 2. Dorsum with 13 pairs of setae. Setae <i>ve</i> pointed and slightly barbed distally, all dorsal setae distinctly barbed distally except setae <i>c</i> 2 smooth and the longest. Lengths of dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi</i> 93 (86–94), <i>ve</i> 140 (143–149), <i>sci</i> 71 (72–76), <i>sce</i> 99 (104–118), <i>c</i> 1 86 (83–93), <i>c</i> 2 150 (154–160), <i>d</i> 1 84 (82–93), <i>d</i> 2 90 (88–91), <i>e</i> 1 83 (85–96), <i>e</i> 2 105 (101–104), <i>f</i> 1 99 (93–101), <i>h</i> 1 103 (97–101), <i>h</i> 2 84 (86–93). Distances between dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi - vi</i> 33 (33–37), <i>ve -ve</i> 106 (102–105), <i>vi - ve</i> 67 (56–66), <i>sci -sci</i> 190 (187–191), <i>ve -sci</i> 63 (64–68), <i>sce -sce</i> 273 (280–291), <i>sci -sce</i> 49 (43–48), <i>c</i> 1- <i>c</i> 1 98 (90– 94), <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 2 340 (325–340), <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 104 (106–108), <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 2 140 (125–135), <i>d</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 108 (94–111), <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 1 101 (97–120), <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 362 (350–357), <i>d</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 132 (125–131), <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 97 (90–95), <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 2 112 (110–155), <i>e</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 107 (96–105), <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 1 119 (108– 125), <i>f</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 174 (169–186), <i>e</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 104 (74–100), <i>e</i> 2- <i>f</i> 1 110 (106–118), <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 103 (86–99), <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 2 94 (59–93), <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 61 (50– 63), <i>h</i> 2- <i>h</i> 2 152 (150–155), <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> <i>2</i> 47 (45–51). Ratio of seta <i>ve</i> / <i>sci</i> 1.9 (2.0).</p> <p> <i>Venter of idiosoma</i>. Coxisternal shields divided, with reticulum and bearing three pairs of intercoxal setae (<i>1a</i>, <i>3a</i>, <i>4a</i>). Aggenital shields entire with reticulum and having three pairs of setae (<i>ag</i> 1-3), <i>ag</i> 3 longer and thicker than others. Anogenital shields smooth, bearing a pair of genital (<i>g</i> 1) and three pairs of pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1-3). <i>ps</i> 1 bluntended weakly barbed distally and much longer than other pseudanal setae. <i>ps</i> 2 and <i>ps</i> 3 smooth and pointed. Lengths and distances of these setae: <i>1a</i> 42 (40–43), <i>3a</i> 38 (35–42), <i>4a</i> 38 (37–42), <i>1a -1a</i> 39 (33–40), <i>3a -3a</i> 62 (59–66), <i>4a - 4a</i> 59 (57–58), <i>ag</i> 1 38 (39–42), <i>ag</i> 2 43 (39–42), <i>ag</i> 3 51 (50–55), <i>g</i> 1 26 (22–23), <i>ps</i> 1 65 (64–68), <i>ps</i> 2 45 (42–44), <i>ps</i> 3 40 (37–39).</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i>. Chelicerae 161 (160–169). Palp 185 (177–186), with reticular patterns. Subcapitulum reticulated, with two pairs of adoral setae (<i>or</i> 1,2) and two pairs of subcapitular setae. Lengths and distances of these setae: <i>m</i> 38 (35–39), <i>n</i> 31 (26–30), <i>m -m</i> 47 (44–46), <i>n -n</i> 31 (28–37), <i>m -n</i> 28 (22–29).</p> <p> <i>Legs</i>. Leg segments with reticulum. Counts of setae and solenidia on legs I–IV: coxae 2–2–2–2, trochanters 1– 1–2–1, femora 6–5–3–2, genua 3(+1κ)–3(+1κ)–1–1, tibiae 5(+1φ+1φρ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ), tarsi 13(+1ω)–9(+1ω)–7(+1ω)–7(+1ω).</p> <p> <i>Male</i> (<i>n</i> = 2) (Figs. 9, 10). Length of body 403–439, width 230–283. Gnathosoma 113–119. Length of legs: Leg I 246–262, leg II 203–230, leg III 19 8 –211, leg IV 221–239.</p> <p> <i>Dorsum of idiosoma</i>. As in female except median zonal shield undivided. <i>pob</i> 36–40 in diameter. All dorsal idiosomal setae faintly barbed as in female except <i>ve</i> tapering towards tip. Lengths of dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi</i> 53 – 64, <i>ve</i> 104–121, <i>sci</i> 43–47, <i>sce</i> 74–85, <i>c</i> 1 53–55, <i>c</i> 2 95–116, <i>d</i> 1 55–56, <i>d</i> 2 46–54, <i>e</i> 1 35–36, <i>e</i> 2 85–113, <i>f</i> 1 81–104, <i>h</i> 1 20–25, <i>h</i> 2 66–70. Distances between dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi - vi</i> 21–28, <i>ve -ve</i> 73–82, <i>vi -ve</i> 38–51, <i>sci -sci</i> 122– 142, <i>ve -sci</i> 44–44, <i>sce -sce</i> 161–187, <i>sci -sce</i> 19–22, <i>c</i> 1- <i>c</i> 1 51–66, <i>c</i> 2- <i>c</i> 2 198–267, <i>c</i> 1- <i>c</i> 2 106–107, <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 2 177–208, <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 63–81, <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 2 73–87, <i>d</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 52–56, <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 1 60–75, <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 144–164, <i>d</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 60–78, <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 49–49, <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 2 54–71, <i>e</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 37–51, <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 1 45–59, <i>f</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 87–89, <i>e</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 41–50, <i>e</i> 2- <i>f</i> 1 44–61, <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 39–45, <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 2 43–48, <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 26–35, <i>h</i> 2- <i>h</i> 2 77–88, <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> 2 24–27.</p> <p> <i>Venter of idiosoma</i>. As in female except genital setae absent. Lengths and distances of intercoxal setae: <i>1a</i> 23– 26, <i>3a</i> 22–23, <i>4a</i> 21–22, <i>1a -1a</i> 20–22, <i>3a -3a</i> 35–36, <i>4a -4a</i> 19–22. Aggenital shield with three pairs of setae (<i>ag</i> 1-3), <i>ag</i> 3 the longest. Anal shields bearing three pairs of pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1-3), <i>ps</i> 1 the longest. Lengths of setae: <i>ag</i> 1 23– 25, <i>ag</i> 2 25–26, <i>ag</i> 3 36–38, <i>ps</i> 1 26–29, <i>ps</i> 2 2–3, <i>ps</i> 3 1–1.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i>. Chelicerae 136–136, palp 139–142. Lengths and distances of subcapitular setae: <i>m</i> 26–27, <i>n</i> 25– 27, <i>m -m</i> 36–38, <i>n -n</i> 25–26, <i>m -n</i> 17–18.</p> <p> <i>Legs</i>. Leg setation as in female except all tarsi bearing an extra, long solenidion ω♂.</p> <p> <i>Deutonymph</i> (<i>n</i> = 1) (Figs. 11, 12). Body 325 long, 229 wide. Gnathosoma 90. Leg I 194, leg II 158, leg III 149, leg IV 163.</p> <p> <i>Dorsum of idiosoma</i>. As in adult female, but patterns on shields not clear. <i>pob</i> 30 in diameter. Lengths of dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi</i> 43, <i>ve</i> 99, <i>sci</i> 30, <i>sce</i> 74, <i>c</i> 1 42, <i>c</i> 2 87, <i>d</i> 1 41, <i>d</i> 2 43, <i>e</i> 1 41, <i>e</i> 2 87, <i>f</i> 1 84, <i>h</i> 1 55, <i>h</i> 2 47. Distances between dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi - vi</i> 20, <i>ve -ve</i> 73, <i>vi -ve</i> 38, <i>sci -sci</i> 120, <i>ve -sci</i> 40, <i>sce -sce</i> 153, <i>sci -sce</i> 18, <i>c</i> 1- <i>c</i> 1 48, <i>c</i> 2- <i>c</i> 2 213, <i>c</i> 1- <i>c</i> 2 63, <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 2 172, <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 69, <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 2 78, <i>d</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 53, <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 1 61, <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 141, <i>d</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 45, <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 44, <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 2 53, <i>e</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 37, <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 1 49, <i>f</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 74, <i>e</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 36, <i>e</i> 2- <i>f</i> 1 52, <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 29, <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 2 27, <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 35, <i>h</i> 2- <i>h</i> 2 75, <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> 2 25.</p> <p> <i>Venter of idiosoma</i>. Similar to adult female but genital setae absent. Lengths and distances of coxisternal setae: <i>1a</i> 17, <i>3a</i> 17, <i>4a</i> 20, <i>1a -1a</i> 21, <i>3a -3a</i> 23, <i>4a -4a</i> 15. Three pairs of aggenital setae (<i>ag</i> 1-3) situated on aggenital shields, aggenital setae nearly equal in length. Anogenital shields subterminal and bearing three pairs of pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1-3). Lengths of aggenital and pseudanal setae: <i>ag</i> 1 17, <i>ag</i> 2 18, <i>ag</i> 3 18, <i>ps</i> 1 23, <i>ps</i> 2 12, <i>ps</i> 3 14.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i>. Chelicerae 111, palp 100. Lengths and distances of subcapitular setae: <i>m</i> 18, <i>n</i> 15, <i>m -m</i> 29, <i>n -n</i> 19, <i>m -n</i> 14.</p> <p> <i>Legs</i>. Counts of setae and solenidia on legs I–IV: coxae 2–2–2–2, trochanters 1–1–2–0, femora 6–4–3–2, genua 3(+1κ)–2(+1κ)–0–0, tibiae 5(+1φρ+1φ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ), tarsi 13(+1ω)–9(+1ω)–7(+1ω)–7(+1ω).</p> <p> <i>Protonymph</i> (<i>n</i> = 1) (Figs. 13, 14). Length of body 237, width 122. Gnathosoma 64. Leg I 145, leg II 112, leg III 109, leg IV 108.</p> <p> <i>Dorsum of idiosoma</i>. As in deutonymph. <i>pob</i> 18 in diameter. Lengths of dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi</i> 24, <i>ve</i> 60, <i>sci</i> 21, <i>sce</i> 30, <i>c</i> 1 24, <i>c</i> 2 53, <i>d</i> 1 27, <i>d</i> 2 26, <i>e</i> 1 24, <i>e</i> 2 47, <i>f</i> 1 44, <i>h</i> 1 29, <i>h</i> 2 19. Distances between dorsal idiosomal setae: <i>vi - vi</i> 16, <i>ve -ve</i> 44, <i>vi -ve</i> 20, <i>sci -sci</i> 77, <i>ve -sci</i> 28, <i>sce -sce</i> 101, <i>sci -sce</i> 12, <i>c</i> 1- <i>c</i> 1 35, <i>c</i> 2- <i>c</i> 2 113, <i>c</i> 1- <i>c</i> 2 62, <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 2 78, <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 48, <i>c</i> 1- <i>d</i> 2 51, <i>d</i> 1- <i>d</i> 1 40, <i>d</i> 2- <i>d</i> 1 33, <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 82, <i>d</i> 2- <i>e</i> 2 41, <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 35, <i>d</i> 1- <i>e</i> 2 47, <i>e</i> 1- <i>e</i> 1 28, <i>e</i> 2- <i>e</i> 1 57, <i>f</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 35, <i>e</i> 1- <i>f</i> 1 34, <i>e</i> 2- <i>f</i> 1 45, <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 21, <i>f</i> 1- <i>h</i> 2 14, <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> 1 22, <i>h</i> 2- <i>h</i> 2 28, <i>h</i> 1- <i>h</i> 2 24.</p> <p> <i>Venter of idiosoma</i>. Coxisternal shields bearing two pairs of intercoxal setae (<i>1a</i>, <i>3a</i>). Setae <i>4a</i> and genital setae absent. Aggenital shields with a pair of setae (<i>ag</i> 1). Lengths and distances of these setae: <i>1a</i> 10, <i>3a</i> 11, <i>1a -1a</i> 16, <i>3a -3a</i> 15. Anogenital shields bearing three pairs of pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1-3). <i>ps</i> 1 nearly twice length of <i>ps</i> 2 and <i>ps</i> 3. Lengths of setae: <i>ag</i> 1 7, <i>ps</i> 1 15, <i>ps</i> 2 8, <i>ps</i> 3 7.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i>. Chelicerae 87, palp 82. Subcapitulum with only a pair of subcapitular setae; <i>m</i> 9, <i>m -m</i> 14.</p> <p> <i>Legs</i>. Counts of setae and solenidia on legs I–IV: coxae 2–2–2–0, trochanters 0–0–1–0, femora 4–4–3–1, genua 3(+1κ)–2(+1κ)–0–0, tibiae 5(+1φρ+1φ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ)–5(+1φρ), tarsi 13(+1ω)–9(+1ω)–7(+1ω)–7(+1ω).</p> <p> <i>Larva</i>. Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The epithet name of this new species, <i>fimus</i> means scat, namely dung, refers to the habitat of the species.</p> <p> <b>Type materials.</b> Holotype female from cow dung, 40° 43' 52''N, 39° 03' 28''E, 1426 m.a.s.l., 24 November 2013, Harşit Valley, TURKEY. Paratypes: 1 female, 2 males and 1 protonymph, same data; 2 females, 3 males and 1 deutonymph from cow dung, 40° 39' 58''N, 38° 59' 52''E, 1994 m.a.s.l., 12 October 2013; 2 females from cow dung, 40° 55' 51''N, 38° 51' 19''E, 60 m. a.s.l., 22 April 2014, Harşit Valley, TURKEY.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> <i>Stigmaeus fimus</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> closely resembles <i>S. silvestris</i> Khaustov, 2014 and <i>S. uzunolukensis</i> Özçelik & Doğan, 2011 in having two pairs of setae on the central shield, similar dorsal ornamentation and the same leg setation; however, the new species is much bigger (680 (657–677) long, 456 (420–450) wide <i>vs.</i> 468 (420–470) long 325 (300–320) wide in <i>S. silvestris</i>); lower ratio <i>ve</i> / <i>sci</i> (1.9 in the new species <i>vs.</i> 3.0 in <i>S. silvestris</i>); setae <i>elcp</i> and <i>elcl</i> spine-like <i>vs.</i> seta-like in <i>S. silvestris</i> (Khaustov 2014).</p> <p> The new species can be distinguished from <i>S. uzunolukensis</i> by the distinctly bigger body size (length of body 680 (657–677), width 456 (420–450) in the new species <i>vs.</i> length 322 (300–350), width 171 (150–200) in <i>S. uzunolukensis</i>); setae <i>c</i> 2 longer than <i>ve</i> in the new species <i>vs.</i> not longer in <i>S. uzunolukensis</i>; setae <i>sci</i> much longer than that of <i>S. uzunolukensis</i> (71 (66–76) in the new species <i>vs.</i> 22 (18–25) in <i>S. uzunolukensis</i>); lower ratio <i>ve</i> / <i>sci</i> (1.9 in the new species <i>vs.</i> 3.1 in <i>S. uzunolukensis</i>); dorsal idiosomal setae not widened distally in the new species <i>vs.</i> most dorsal idiosomal setae, especially <i>e</i> 1, <i>f</i> 1, <i>h</i> 1, <i>h</i> 2, distinctly widened distally in <i>S. uzunolukensis</i> (Özçelik & Doğan 2011).</p>Published as part of <i>Doğan, Sibel, Doğan, Salih & Erman, Orhan, 2017, Description of five new species of the genus Stigmaeus Koch (Acari: Raphignathoidea: Stigmaeidae) from Turkey, pp. 451-478 in Zootaxa 4276 (4)</i> on pages 456-461, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4276.4.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/807819">http://zenodo.org/record/807819</a>
Antagonisme, konflikt og identitet. En begrepsanalyse av «antagonisme» i teorien til Chantal Mouffe.
No full text«Agonistisk pluralisme» er Chantal Mouffe sin radikale demokratiteori, og teorien er dypt forankret i den post-strukturalistiske tradisjonen. «Antagonisme» er et helt sentralt begrep i teorien, og beskriver identitetskonflikter mellom subjekter. Eva Erman har fremsatt en interessant kritikk av teorien til Mouffe, og hevder at ideen om antagonisme er uholdbar. Ved å ta utgangspunkt i Erman sin kritikk av Mouffe sin teori tar denne oppgaven sikte på å gjennomføre en begrepsanalyse av «antagonisme». Det muliggjør både en diskusjon av hvorvidt Erman sin kritikk er overbevisende, og en grundig redegjørelse av hvordan antagonisme-begrepet bør forstås innenfor teorien til Mouffe. I tillegg til begrepsanalyse er teoretisk argumentasjon en viktig metodologisk tilnærming gjennom hele oppgaven. Med Mouffe sin teori som teoretisk avgrensing av argumentenes gyldighet, er påstanden i denne oppgaven at Erman sin kritikk ikke er overbevisende. I oppgaven argumenteres det for at antagonisme-begrepet i teorien til Mouffe krever en differensiert konseptualisering på to analytiske nivåer: det ontiske og det ontologiske. Den viktigste årsaken til at kritikken til Erman ikke er overbevisende er nettopp at Erman oppfatter «antagonisme» som utelukkende et ontologisk begrep, og som en konsekvens av det misforstår sentrale aspekter ved teorien til Mouffe
Adjustment factors for MEPDG pavement responses considering three- dimensional analysis and wide-base tire
Get PDFThe Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) provides a superior methodology as compared to its predecessor in the design and analysis of pavement structures. The mechanistic (MEDPG analysis) calculates critical pavement responses due to pavement-tire interactions. On the other hand, the empirical part refers to the prediction of pavement distress propagation over time using transfer functions. Transfer functions link critical pavement responses to particular pavement distresses. Although MEPDG analysis provides a theoretically framework for pavement simulations, its limitations and simplifications may produce inaccurate pavement response calculations. In contrast, finite element (FE) analysis has proven capable of overcoming these limitations by simulating pavement more realistically in terms of material characterization and loading conditions. However, the high computational cost of the FE analysis precludes its use as a pavement analysis engine within the MEPDG’s framework. Therefore, this study suggests two adjustment factors based on FE analysis to bridge the gap between reality and MEPDG analysis. The first adjustment factor—developed utilizing 480 cases performed in ABAQUS and considering similar material properties and pavement structure—converts pavement responses obtained from dual tire assembly (DTA) loading to new generation wide base tire (NG-WBT) loading. The second adjustment factor—developed from running 336 cases in MEPDG and FE analyses using compatible input parameters—accounts for the limitations of MEPDG analysis regarding the material characterization and loading conditions. The simulated cases were selected to capture extreme conditions—e.g., thick and thin pavement structures with strong and weak material properties—so that extrapolation could be avoided during the implementation of the equations. The adjustment factors revealed that NG-WBT produces higher responses than DTA, which can cause greater pavement damage. Additionally, MEPDG analysis fails to capture the effect of non-uniformity and the three dimensionality of contact stress on pavement response. The discrepancy becomes significant; especially for the pavement responses near the pavement surface, such as tensile strain at the AC surface and vertical shear strain within the AC layer, that are believed to cause top-down cracking.Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2017-12-01The student, Osman Erman Gungor, accepted the attached license on 2015-12-11 at 12:46.The student, Osman Erman Gungor, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2015-12-11 at 12:51.This Thesis was approved for publication on 2015-12-11 at 15:24.DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9017 on 2016-03-02 at 14:14:32Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-02T21:07:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
GUNGOR-THESIS-2015.pdf: 2481315 bytes, checksum: c35e0756b727171ecf7e330d63fdac28 (MD5)
LICENSE.txt: 4215 bytes, checksum: 9b43dc0fc0849df086e56878310e9602 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-12-11Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 91446
Lift date: 2018-03-02T21:07:27Z
Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD systemLimited Restriction Lifted for Item 91446 on 2018-03-03T10:15:37Z
- …
