326,454 research outputs found

    Hanlon, S. J.

    No full text

    Hanlon, J J, On17316

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/390181Surname: HANLON. Given Name(s) or Initials: J J. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: ON17316. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 1190.214950 Item: [2016.0049.22474] "Hanlon, J J, On17316

    Hanlon, L R (Lindsay Roy), NX30821

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/390179Surname: HANLON. Given Name(s) or Initials: L R (LINDSAY ROY). Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX30821. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 34781.214948 Item: [2016.0049.22472] "Hanlon, L R (Lindsay Roy), NX30821

    Hanlon, Mr E M G (Edwin Marcus), [No Service Number]

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/390178Surname: HANLON. Given Name(s) or Initials: MR E M G (EDWIN MARCUS). Military Service Number or Last Known Location: [No Registration Number]. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 10352.214947 Item: [2016.0049.22471] "Hanlon, Mr E M G (Edwin Marcus), [No Service Number]

    M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I, That used to be so hard to spell [first line of chorus]

    No full text
    strophic with choruspiano and voiceads on inside front and on back covers for William Jerome Publishing Corp. stockJohns Hopkins University, Levy Sheet Music Collection, Box 153, Item 136Lyric by Bert Hanlon and Benny Ryan. Melody by Harry Tierney.Sung With Enormous Success By Frances White of the Famous Team of Rock & Whitephoto of White by Jay Herts, N.Y.; Barbelle; F.J. Lawson Co. N.Y

    M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I, That used to be so hard to spell [first line of chorus]

    No full text
    strophic with choruspiano and voiceads on inside front and on back covers for William Jerome Publishing Corp. stockJohns Hopkins University, Levy Sheet Music Collection, Box 153, Item 136Lyric by Bert Hanlon and Benny Ryan. Melody by Harry Tierney.Sung With Enormous Success By Frances White of the Famous Team of Rock & Whitephoto of White by Jay Herts, N.Y.; Barbelle; F.J. Lawson Co. N.Y

    Reply to Hanlon: Transitions in science careers

    No full text
    We thank Hanlon for his comments on our paper and appreciate his summary of our findings (1). We recognize the concerns raised regarding both research and non-research roles in science. For example, the National Science Foundation reports various estimates of the science labor force: about 6 million in “science and engineering [S&E] occupations,” about 12 million in non-S&E occupations closely or somewhat related to their S&E degree, about 17 million whose highest degree is in S&E, and about 23 million with at least 1 S&E degree (2)

    Reply to Hanlon: Transitions in science careers

    No full text
    We thank Hanlon for his comments on our paper and appreciate his summary of our findings (1). We recognize the concerns raised regarding both research and non-research roles in science. For example, the National Science Foundation reports various estimates of the science labor force: about 6 million in “science and engineering [S&E] occupations,” about 12 million in non-S&E occupations closely or somewhat related to their S&E degree, about 17 million whose highest degree is in S&E, and about 23 million with at least 1 S&E degree (2)

    Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)

    No full text
    This study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore