1,722,126 research outputs found

    Shang han yi fang ge jue

    No full text
    [范時崇鑒定 ; 劉宏壁删補].綫裝.框18.8x12.5公分, 9行21字. 白口, 四周雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心上鐫書名, 中鐫卷次及小題, 下鐫葉次及字數.題名據目錄.內封背頁刻"喻嘉言方中行周禹載合註, 劉宏璧脈法問答方歌, 浙江書局".劉宏璧序言刻書事. 有校閱姓氏, 書中不避"弘"字.卷十八卷端題為"傷寒醫方歌訣"《中國中醫古籍總目》(00700)著錄.鈐"莊兆祥印", "莊兆祥".Xian zhuang.Kuang 18.8 x 12.5 gong fen, 9 hang 21 zi. Bai kou, si zhou shuang bian, dan hei yu wei. Ban xin shang juan shu ming, zhong juan juan ci ji xiao ti, xia juan ye ci ji zi shu.Ti ming ju mu lu.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Juan shi ba juan duan ti wei "Shang han yi fang ge jue"Detailed notes in vernacular field only.[Fan Shichong jian ding ; Liu Hongbi shan bu].Qian "Zhuang Zhaoxiang yin", "Zhuang Zhaoxiang"

    Han, Yi

    No full text

    Wang Yinglin "Han yi wen zhi kao zheng" yan jiu.

    No full text
    陳鴻圖."2007年7月".論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2007.參考文獻(leaves 329-348)."2007 nian 7 yue".Abstracts in Chinese and English.Chen Hongtu.Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2007.Can kao wen xian (leaves 329-348).Chapter 第一章 --- 緒言 --- p.1Chapter 第一節 --- 硏究動機 --- p.1Chapter 第二節 --- 硏究回顧 --- p.3Chapter 第三節 --- 硏究方法及組織 --- p.7Chapter 第二章 --- 《漢藝文志考證》成書的若干問題 --- p.10Chapter 第一節 --- 王應麟的生平及著述考 --- p.10Chapter 1.1 --- 王應麟的生平 --- p.10Chapter 1.2 --- 王應麟著述考 --- p.13Chapter 第二節 --- 前人論《漢藝文志考證》成書的兩種說法 --- p.21Chapter 第三節 --- 從三個方面論證《漢藝文志考證》的「未成書」說 --- p.26Chapter 第四節 --- 危素《漢藝文志考證´Ø序》與《漢藝文志考證》的成書 --- p.34Chapter 第五節 --- 餘論 --- p.39附表一:王應麟著作綜述 --- p.41附表二:王應麟著作編年 --- p.62附表三:《漢藝文志考證》的版本 --- p.68Chapter 第三章 --- 《漢藝文志考證》的著錄體例 --- p.69Chapter 第一節 --- 著錄體例 --- p.69Chapter 1.1 --- 著錄內容 --- p.69Chapter 1.2 --- 著錄條數 --- p.70Chapter 1.3 --- 著錄形式 --- p.73Chapter 第二節 --- 輯錄體例 --- p.81Chapter 2.1 --- 「補注體」 --- p.82Chapter 2.2 --- 何謂「輯錄體」 --- p.83Chapter 2.3 --- 《漢藝文志考證》的輯錄體性質 --- p.88附表一:《漢藝文志考證》條目分類統計 --- p.96Chapter 第四章 --- 《漢藝文志考證》的取材與考證 --- p.99Chapter 第一節 --- 取材方面 --- p.99Chapter 1.1 --- 取材特色 --- p.99Chapter 1.2 --- 取材方式 --- p.115Chapter 1.3 --- 小結 --- p.124Chapter 第二節 --- 考證方面 --- p.125Chapter 2.1 --- 《漢藝文志考證》的考證特色 --- p.125Chapter 2.2 --- 小結 --- p.139Chapter 第三節 --- 餘論 --- p.139Chapter 3.1 --- 小引 --- p.139Chapter 3.2 --- 王鳴盛的批評 --- p.140附表一:《漢藝文志考證》引書統計 --- p.149Chapter 第五章 --- 《漢藝文志考證》的「不著錄」書 --- p.159Chapter 第一節 --- 「不著錄」書的數目 --- p.159Chapter 第二節 --- 「不著錄」書的著錄方式 --- p.160Chapter 第三節 --- 「不著錄」書的年代 --- p.168Chapter 3.1 --- 「不著錄」書的年代 --- p.168Chapter 3.2 --- 「僞書」與「不著錄」書 --- p.176Chapter 第四節 --- 《漢藝文志考證》與《新唐書´Ø藝文志》的「不著錄」 --- p.179Chapter 4.1 --- 《新唐書´Ø藝文志》的「不著錄」書 --- p.179Chapter 4.2 --- 《漢藝文志考證》與《新唐書´Ø藝文志》「不著錄」書之比較 --- p.181Chapter 第五節 --- 餘論 --- p.182Chapter 第六章 --- 《漢藝文志考證》在目錄學上的地位 --- p.187Chapter 第一節 --- 小引 --- p.187Chapter 第二節 --- 宋以前對〈漢志〉的硏究綜述 --- p.188Chapter 第三節 --- 《漢藝文志考證》的目錄學成就 --- p.191Chapter 3.1 --- 考志方面 --- p.191Chapter 3.2 --- 補志方面 --- p.202Chapter 第七章 --- 結語 --- p.210附錄一)《漢藝文志考證》與《漢書´Ø藝文志》條目比較表 --- p.212附錄二)《漢藝文志考證》引書、引人表 --- p.237附錄三)〈漢志〉補志數目統計 --- p.315參考書目 --- p.32

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Modeling and simulation of intrinsically disordered biomolecular systems

    No full text
    Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2024-05-01The student, Han-Yi Chou, accepted the attached license on 2022-04-14 at 10:31.The student, Han-Yi Chou, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2022-04-14 at 11:08.This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2022-04-15 at 09:12.DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #17668 on 2022-11-11 at 12:19:13The conventional sequence-structure-functionality paradigm relates the molecular structures uniquely to the biological functionalities. Recently, this paradigm has been complemented by a new perspective as overwhelming experimental evidence reveals the significant roles of intrinsically disordered molecules in multiple biological functions. Despite of advancement in modern laboratory equipments and techniques, simulation and theoretical modeling remain valuable and serve as complementary tools for they are able to probe into details and to provide explanations for experimental observations. In this dissertation, simulation and modeling were combined to investigate intrinsically disordered molecules in various biological systems. Our research provides detailed descriptions and theoretical models for multiple intrinsically disordered molecules which are vital in cellular functions

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore