323,916 research outputs found
Corythucha pellucida Drake & Hambleton 1938
No full text<i>Corythucha pellucida</i> Drake & Hambleton, 1938 <p> <i>Corythucha pellucida</i> Drake & Hambleton, 1938: 67-68.</p> <p> <b>Paratype:</b> 1♂, glued to pinned paper; Brasil, São Paulo, Campinas, 10.III.1936, E.J. Hambleton col.</p>Published as part of <i>Carrenho, Renan, Rodrigues, Higor D. D., Lima, Adriana Carneiro de & Schwertner, Cristiano F., 2020, Type specimens of true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) housed in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 1-16 in Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 60</i> on page 5, DOI: 10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.17, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4614885">http://zenodo.org/record/4614885</a>
Pseudococcus sociabilis Hambleton 1935
No full textPseudococcus sociabilis Hambleton Material studied. URUGUAY: Cerillos, ex fruits of Citrus limon (Rutaceae), 34°37’17.5”S 56°21’38.9”W, 10.x.2018, coll. Delgado, S., 8 adult ♀♀, ECFA No. 143. Hosts. Reported on Coffea sp. (Rutaceae) (Kondo et al. 2008), Diospyros lasiocalyx (= Diospyros hispida) (Ebenaceae), Glycine max (Fabaceae), Mimosa tenuiflora (= Mimosa nigra) (Mimosaceae) (Williams & Granara de Willink, 1992), Diospyros kaki (Pacheco da Silva et al. 2017), Erythrina speciosa (Fabaceae), and Hedera helix (Araliaceae) (Hambleton 1935). Distribution. Neotropical region (García Morales et al. 2016). This is the first record of Ps. sociabilis on Uruguay.Published as part of Pacheco Da Silva, Vitor C., Kaydan, Mehmet Bora & Basso, Cesar, 2020, Pseudococcidae (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) in Uruguay: morphological identification and molecular characterization, with descriptions of two new species, pp. 501-520 in Zootaxa 4894 (4) on page 516, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4894.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/431665
Frank Hambleton, VMI Cadet, wearing civilian clothes, ca. 1876
No full textCadet Frank S. Hambleton, Class of 1876. Studio portrait (seated); wearing civilian clothes.hole upper lef
Stephanitis (Stephanitis) farameae Drake & Hambleton 1935
No full text<i>Stephanitis (Stephanitis) farameae</i> Drake & Hambleton, 1935 <p> <i>Stephanitis farameae</i> Drake & Hambleton 1935: 151–152.</p> <p> <i>Stephanitis farameae</i>: Monte, 1939: 78 (note); 1941: 132 (catalog); Drake & Maa, 1953: 100) (checklist); Drake & Ruhoff, 1965: 355 (catalog).</p> <p> <b>Geographic distribution.</b> São Paulo and Minas Gerais, Brazil (Drake & Hambleton 1935, Monte 1939).</p> <p> <b>Plant associations.</b> <i>Faramea montevidensis</i> [Rubiaceae] (Drake & Hambleton 1935).</p>Published as part of <i>Knudson, Alexander H., Rider, David A. & Knodel, Janet J., 2021, Two new species of Tingidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Panama, pp. 334-344 in Zootaxa 4958 (1)</i> on page 339, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4958.1.20, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4692006">http://zenodo.org/record/4692006</a>
Homotopy Self-Equivalences of Four-Manifolds
No full textIn this thesis, we study the group of base-point preserving homotopy classes of homotopy self-equivalences of a four-manifold. Based on the approach of Hambleton and Kreck, an explicit description of this group is obtained when the fundamental group of the manifold is either a free group or a two-dimensional Poincare duality group. As a byproduct, a classification of such four-manifolds up to s-cobordism is obtained by using the modified surgery theory of Kreck.ThesisDoctor of Philosophy (PhD
Stephanitis (Stephanitis) olyrae Drake & Hambleton 1935
No full text<i>Stephanitis (Stephanitis) olyrae</i> Drake & Hambleton, 1935 <p> <i>Stephanitis olyrae</i> Drake & Hambleton, 1935: 150–151, fig. 5.</p> <p> <i>Stephanitis olyrae</i>: Monte, 1939: 78 (note); 1941: 133 (catalog); Drake & Maa, 1953: 101 (checklist); Drake & Ruhoff, 1965: 358 (catalog); Neal & Schaefer, 2000: 101 (note).</p> <p> <b>Geographic distribution.</b> Minas Gerais and São Paulo, Brazil (Drake & Hambleton 1935, Monte 1939).</p> <p> <b>Plant associations.</b> <i>Olyra micrantha</i> [Poaceae] (Drake & Hambleton 1935).</p>Published as part of <i>Knudson, Alexander H., Rider, David A. & Knodel, Janet J., 2021, Two new species of Tingidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Panama, pp. 334-344 in Zootaxa 4958 (1)</i> on page 341, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4958.1.20, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4692006">http://zenodo.org/record/4692006</a>
Bowlby and attachment theory: lessons for dementia care
No full textLouisa J Jackman and Sarah Hambleton explain how attachment theory can help us better understand people with dementia who have life-long difficulty relating to others
The anamorph genus <i>Knufia</i> and its phylogenetically allied species in <i>Coniosporium</i>, <i>Sarcinomyces</i>, and <i>Phaeococcomyces</i>
No full text Knufia endospora , a species described previously on the basis of cultured material, was found forming distinctive sporodochia on the bark of balsam poplar. Phylogenetic analyses of this fungus and some allied species indicated that (i) it forms a monophyletic group with Knufia cryptophialidica (type species of Knufia ) and with Coniosporium perforans , Coniosporium epidermidis and Phaeococcomyces chersonesos and (ii) P. chersonesos and Sarcinomyces petricola are conspecific. These Coniosporium and Phaeococcomyces species also shared major morphological characteristics with Knufia in culture and were morphologically and phylogenetically distant from the type species of their respective genera. The following new combinations are proposed: Knufia perforans (Sterflinger) Tsuneda, Hambleton & Currah; Knufia epidermidis (D.M. Li, de Hoog, Saunte & X.R. Chen) Tsuneda, Hambleton & Currah; and Knufia chersonesos (Bogom. & Minter) Tsuneda, Hambleton & Currah. Phaeococcomyces catenatus and Phaeococcomyces nigricans (type species of Phaeococcomyces) were morphologically similar but phylogenetically distant from each other and from Knufia. </jats:p
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
