1,720,967 research outputs found

    Oligonucleotide chip for the diagnosis of HNF-1 alpha mutations

    No full text
    Mutations in HNF-1 alpha cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) type 3, which is the most prevalent MODY subtype in most countries. In the present study, we investigated an oligonucleotide microchip for the detection of the known HNF-1 alpha mutations. We first optimized the coupling chemistries for covalent immobilization of allele-specific oligonucleotides on aldehyde (CHO)- and thiocyanate (NCS)-activated glass slides and compared their hybridization efficiencies. CHO-glass was found to provide a more favorable environment for hybridization than NCS-glass, whereas the binding capacity of NCS-glass for amine-activated oligonucleotide was much greater than with CHO-glass. We also investigated the effects of the length of the capture probes on the hybridized signals. To determine the presence of HNF-1 alpha mutations in a human sample, we prepared an oligonucleotide chip from selected mutation sites of exon2 from HNF-1 alpha. Cy3-labeled RNA target probes were obtained by in vitro transcription of promoter-tagged PCR products from a wild-type blood sample and subsequent fragmentation. Hybridization of the chip with the RNA target probes successfully identified all of the genotypes for the tested sites. This work demonstrates that oligonucleotide chip-based analysis is a good candidate for routine clinical testing for HNF-1 alpha mutations. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 (BK21) Program and Center for Ultramicrochemical Process Systems sponsored by KOSEF

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore