1,720,991 research outputs found
Diagnosing myocarditis in endomyocardial biopsies: survey of current practice
Full text linkDallas criteria (DC) and European Society of Cardiology criteria (ESCC) have provided valuable frameworks for the histologic diagnosis and classification of myocarditis in endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) specimens. However, the adaptation and the usage of these criteria are variable and depend on local practice settings and regions/countries. Moreover, several ancillary tests that are not included in the current criteria, such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) or viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have proven useful for the diagnosis of myocarditis
A comparison of tissue dissection techniques for diagnostic, prognostic, and theragnostic analysis of human disease
Full text linkHistopathology has historically been the critical technique for the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Today, genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics from specific cells, rather than bulk tissue, have become key to understanding underlying disease mechanisms and rendering useful diagnostic information. Extraction of desired analytes, i.e. nucleic acids or proteins, from easily accessible formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues allows for clinically-relevant activities, such as sequencing biomarker mutations or typing amyloidogenic proteins. Genetic profiling has become routine for cancers as varied as non-small cell lung cancer and prostatic carcinoma. The five main tissue dissection techniques that have been developed thus far include: bulk scraping, manual macrodissection (MMa), manual microdissection (MMi), laser-capture microdissection (LCM), and expression microdissection (xMD). In this review, we discuss the importance of tissue dissection in clinical research, the basic methods, applications, as well as some advantages and disadvantages for each modality
A comparison of tissue dissection techniques for diagnostic, prognostic, and theragnostic analysis of human disease
No full textHistopathology has historically been the critical technique for the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Today, genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics from specific cells, rather than bulk tissue, have become key to understanding underlying disease mechanisms and rendering useful diagnostic information. Extraction of desired analytes, i.e. nucleic acids or proteins, from easily accessible formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues allows for clinically-relevant activities, such as sequencing biomarker mutations or typing amyloidogenic proteins. Genetic profiling has become routine for cancers as varied as non-small cell lung cancer and prostatic carcinoma. The five main tissue dissection techniques that have been developed thus far include: bulk scraping, manual macrodissection (MMa), manual microdissection (MMi), laser-capture microdissection (LCM), and expression microdissection (xMD). In this review, we discuss the importance of tissue dissection in clinical research, the basic methods, applications, as well as some advantages and disadvantages for each modality
Myocarditis and endomyocardial biopsy: achieving consensus diagnosis on hundred cases
No full textThe two histopathology benchmarks used to diagnose myocarditis are the Dallas Criteria, developed in 1984 and the European Society of Cardiology criteria, developed in 2013, which added immunohistochemistry for the detection of CD3+ T cells (lymphocytes) and CD68+ macrophages. Despite their near universal acceptance, the extent to which pathologists use these criteria or their own criteria to consistently render the diagnosis of myocarditis on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is unknown. We digitally scanned slides from 100 heart biopsies, including a trichrome stain and immunostaining, that were chosen as representative of myocarditis, non-myocarditis, and borderline myocarditis, as diagnosed per one institution's use of the Dallas Criteria. Eight blinded international cardiovascular experts were asked to render diagnoses and offer a confidence score on each case. No clinical histories were shared. There was full initial agreement across all experts on 37 cases (16 myocarditis and 21 non-myocarditis) and moderate consensus on 35 cases. After individual inquiries and group discussion, consensus was reached on 90 cases. Diagnostic confidence was highest among the myocarditis diagnoses, lowest for borderline cases, and significantly different between the three diagnostic categories (myocarditis, borderline myocarditis, non-myocarditis; P-value=8.49 × 10-57; ANOVA). Diagnosing myocarditis, particularly in cases with limited inflammation and injury, remains a challenge even for experts in the field. Intermediate cases, termed "borderline" in the Dallas Criteria, represent those for which consensus is particularly hard to achieve. To increase consistency for the histopathologic diagnosis of myocarditis, we will need more specifically defined criteria, more granular descriptions of positive and negative features, clarity on how to incorporate immunohistochemistry findings, and improved nomenclature
Lymphocytic myocarditis: A histopathologic definition and classification from the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology and Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. I: Endomyocardial biopsy
No full textBackground and aim: Lymphocytic myocarditis has long been appreciated as a lymphocyte-predominant myocardial inflammation with resultant myocyte injury. However, current methods of diagnosis on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) lead to inconsistent diagnoses. To improve patient care, the criteria for the diagnosis of lymphocytic myocarditis on endomyocardial biopsies have been revised to address shortcomings of the Dallas Criteria and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria. Methods and results: In the Seaport area of Boston, a panel of expert cardiovascular pathologists from the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology (SCVP) and the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology (AECVP) completed a three-year project to develop consensus terms and definitions. These “Seaport” criteria for EMB were developed to utilize CD3 immunohistochemistry for T lymphocytes and accurately define each level of histopathologic severity based on extent of infiltrate and presence of myocyte injury. These criteria create a diagnostic approach to lymphocytic myocarditis using three grades of severity (mild, moderate, and severe) along with a category of scattered increased T lymphocytes of undetermined significance (SITUS). The document discusses the role of ancillary studies, the relationship to other diagnostic modalities, and areas of continuing controversy in the development of these criteria. Conclusion: These consensus-based criteria offer a standardized framework for diagnosing lymphocytic myocarditis in EMB. Adoption of these easy-to-use criteria will improve classification of lymphocytic myocarditis as an aid to diagnose and treat patients
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
