1,721,100 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Paper-based lateral flow assay for the point-of-care detection of neurofilament light chain

    No full text
    Neurofilament light chain (NF-L) is a protein found in neurons of the nervous system and is widely used as a biomarker for neurological disorders. However, the current methods for detecting NF-L levels are complicated, expensive, and require specialized equipment, making it challenging to implement in a point-of-care (POC) setting. In this study, we developed a gold nanoshell (AuNS)-assisted lateral flow assay (LFA) based test strip for the POC detection of NF-L at a low ng/mL level (8 ng/mL = 117.65 pM). The test strip is a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method for detecting NF-L, making it suitable for use in a POC setting for the diagnosis and treatment of various neurological disorders. With its ease of use and reliability, the paper-based LFA is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of neurological conditions.Clinical Relevance - The AuNS-assisted LFA test strip developed in this study offers a rapid, cost-effective, and simple method for detecting NF-L levels, making it of great interest to practicing clinicians for the diagnosis of various neurological diseases such as HIV-associated dementia (HID), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).</p

    RNA reporter based CRISPR/Cas12a biosensing platform for sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA

    No full text
    CRISPR/Cas biotechnology provides an exceptional platform for biosensor development. To date, the reported CRISPR/Cas biosensing systems have shown extraordinary performance for nucleic acids, small molecules, small proteins and microorganism detection. The CRISPR/Cas12a biosensing system, as a typical example, has been well established and applied for both nucleic acids and non-nucleic acids target detection. However, all established CRISPR/Cas12a biosensing systems are based on DNA reporters, which potentially limits further application.In this study, we established an RNA reporter based CRISPR/Cas12a biosensing system. A basic biosensing system was evaluated, and the limit of detection was found to be 1 nM. Afterwards, we optimized this biosensing system using both temperature and chemical enhancers. The final optimal biosensing system (with DTT &amp; 37°C) shows fluorescence signal increased by a factor of ~10 compared with the basic system. The optimal biosensing system was further applied for the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which shows over 4 orders of magnitude detection range from 1pM to 25 nM, with the limit of detection of 1pM. This RNA reporter based CRISPR/Cas12a biosensing system provides an effective platform for nucleic acids quantification.Clinical Relevance-This research provides a novel approach for ctDNA diagnostics, which is an attractive biomarker for noninvasive monitoring of tumor growth, response, and spread.</p

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore