1,720,956 research outputs found

    Circular Economy for Transport Infrastructure: An Overview of the Sustainable Use of Recycled Asphalt Shingles in Asphalt Mixtures

    Get PDF
    In North America and Europe, asphalt shingle waste created during the installation of roofing membranes and tear-off shingles retrieved at the end of the membrane’s life cycle are two major sources of municipal solid waste. Since almost 15–35% of recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) consist of an asphalt binder, the effective recycling of RAS into asphalt mixtures could also allow a reduction in the consumption of non-renewable resources such as asphalt binders. In this context, several studies investigating the use of RAS in asphalt mixtures can be found in the literature, although they exhibit widespread and sometimes conflicting information about the investigated materials, the mix preparation and testing methodologies and the experimental findings. Given this background, this review paper aims at summarizing the existing information and research gaps, providing a synthetic and rational picture of the current literature, where similar attempts cannot be found. In particular, different research studies show that the use of RAS in asphalt mixtures is an economical as well as an eco-friendly option. RAS with up to 20% by weight of binder or 5% by weight of aggregate/mixtures (eventually in combination with 15% reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate) were found to be relatively suitable to improve the performance properties of asphalt mixtures, both in the laboratory and in the field. Adding RAS to asphalt mixtures could enhance their stiffness, strength and rutting resistance (i.e., high-temperature properties), while negatively affecting the mixtures’ fatigue and thermal cracking resistance. However, the addition of specific biomaterials (e.g., bio-binders, bio-oils) or additives to asphalt mixtures can mitigate such issues, resulting in lower brittleness and shear susceptibilities and thus improving the anti-cracking performance. On the other hand, the literature review revealed that several aspects still need to be studied in detail. As an example, RAS-modified porous asphalt mixtures (fatigue, rutting, moisture susceptibility and thermal cracking) need specific research, and there are no comprehensive research studies on the effects of the RAS mixing time, size and mixing temperature in asphalt mixtures. Moreover, the addition of waste cooking/engine oils (biomaterials) as asphalt binder rejuvenators in combination with RAS represents an attractive aspect to be studied in detail

    Recycling End-of-Life Bituminous Membranes in Asphalt Mixtures: A Laboratory Study

    No full text
    The circular economy (i.e., reuse and recycling of waste materials) is gaining attention for the goal of achieving net-zero waste. In this regard, the use of waterproofing membrane waste in bituminous materials can be a valid option, as every year, a lot of bituminous membrane wastes are generated both as production scraps or end-of-life wastes. Given this background, the recycling feasibility of end-of-life bituminous membrane waste (MW) in asphalt mixtures was assessed in this research study. To this aim, MW shreds (≤20 mm) were added to dense-graded bituminous mixtures using the dry-mixing method. The shreds were dosed at 0.5% by the mix weight (mix coded as SH−) or at 2% by mix weight (mix coded as SH+). A corresponding reference mix without MW was also tested for comparison purposes. The mixtures’ workability, strength and stiffness as well as permanent deformation, moisture and fatigue resistance were evaluated. Overall, the laboratory experimental findings showed that MW-modified bituminous mixtures with a higher dosage of membrane waste (SH+) have relatively higher moisture resistance, fatigue resistance, stiffness and high-temperature performance with respect to the corresponding reference mix. Moreover, both the reference and MW-modified mixtures showed similar workability regardless of the MW content

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore