1,721,497 research outputs found
Don't do it! Cortical inhibition and self-attribution during action observation
No full textNumerous studies suggest that both self-generated and observed actions of others activate overlapping neural networks, implying a shared, agent-neutral representation of self and other. Contrary to the shared representation hypothesis, we recently showed that the human motor system is not neutral with respect to the agent of an observed action [Schütz-Bosbach, S., Mancini, B., Aglioti, S. M., & Haggard, P. Self and other in the human motor system. Current Biology, 16, 1830–1834, 2006]. Observation of actions attributed to another agent facilitated the motor system, whereas observation of identical actions linked to the self did not. Here we investigate whether the absence of motor facilitation for observing one’s own actions reflects a specific process of cortical inhibition associated with self-representation. We analyzed the duration of the silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in active muscles as an indicator of motor inhibition. We manipulated whether an observed action was attributed to another agent, or to the subjects themselves, using a manipulation of body ownership on the basis of the rubber hand illusion. Observation of actions linked to the self led to longer silent periods than observation of a static hand, but the opposite effect occurred when observing identical actions attributed to another agent. This finding suggests a specific inhibition of the motor system associated with self-representation. Cortical suppression for actions linked to the self might prevent inappropriate perseveration within the motor system
Viewing the body prepares the brain for touch: effects of TMS over somatosensory cortex
No full textViewing the body can improve tactile perception. We investigated whether this could be due to a remodeling of somatosensory cortical areas during vision of the body. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered over the primary and secondary somatosensory areas of subjects who showed clear visual-tactile enhancement while they performed a tactile grating discrimination task. Before the tactile stimulus, subjects viewed either their right index finger through a semisilvered mirror or an object reflected by the mirror and positioned to appear in the same location as the finger. In a first experiment we observed that TMS over primary somatosensory cortex significantly reduced subjects' accuracy whilst viewing the hand. No such reduction was found when subjects viewed a neutral object. In a second experiment, we disrupted the activity of primary and secondary somatosensory areas in different sessions. When stimulating the primary somatosensory cortex, a reduction in accuracy was again found while viewing the hand, but not a neutral object. TMS over secondary somatosensory cortex had no effect in any condition. Our results show that vision of the body may act at an early stage in stimulus elaboration and perception, allowing an anticipatory tuning of the neural circuits in primary somatosensory cortex that underlie tactile acuity
From Freedom From to Freedom To: New Perspectives on Intentional Action
Full text linkThere are few concepts as relevant as that of intentional action in shaping our sense of self and the interaction with the environment. At the same time, few concepts are so elusive. Indeed, both conceptual and neuroscientific accounts of intentional agency have proven to be problematic. On the one hand, most conceptual views struggle in defining how agents can adequately exert control over their actions. On the other hand, neuroscience settles for definitions by exclusion whereby key features of human intentional actions, including goal-directness, remain underspecified. This paper reviews the existing literature and sketches how this gap might be filled. In particular, we defend a gradualist notion of intentional behavior, which revolves around the following key features: autonomy, flexibility in the integration of causal vectors, and control
IMITATION WITHOUT AWARENESS
No full textmitation is a characteristic but little-understood function of the human brain and of some higher animals. The direct matching hypothesis suggests that a specialised brain circuit is able to extract and directly copy the motor commands of another person's observed actions. Here we investigate how conscious people are of this kind of imitation. We first showed that imitation reactions are faster than simple visual reaction times, consistent with a direct matching circuit in the CNS. We next compared the perceived time of imitation reactions in 17 healthy subjects with other kinds of actions. We found a significant delay in subjects' awareness of their own imitation reactions. Thus, while imitation reactions are unusually fast, subjects are not aware of this. The brain's direct-matching circuit for imitation partly bypasses conscious awareness
Transforming the Thermal Grill Effect by Crossing the Fingers
Full text linkSummaryThe relation between pain perception and spatial representation of the body is poorly understood. In the thermal grill illusion (TGI), alternating non-noxious warm and cold temperatures cause a paradoxical, sometimes painful, sensation of burning heat [1]. We combined thermal grill stimulation with crossing the fingers to investigate whether nociceptively mediated sensation depends on the somatotopic or spatiotopic configuration of thermal inputs. We stimulated the index, middle, and ring fingers when the middle finger either was or was not crossed over the index to generate “warm-cold-warm” patterns in either somatotopic or spatiotopic coordinates. Participants adjusted a temperature delivered to the other hand until it matched their perception of the cold target finger (index or middle). We found significant temperature overestimation when the target was central within the spatial configuration (warm-cold-warm) compared to when it was peripheral (cold-warm-warm). Crucially, this effect depended on the spatiotopic configuration of thermal inputs, but it was independent of the finger posture and present for both index and middle target fingers—the thermal grill effect for the middle finger was abolished when it was crossed over the index to adopt a spatiotopically peripheral position, while the same effect was newly generated for the index finger by the same postural change. Our results suggest that the locations of multiple stimuli are remapped into external space as a group; nociceptively mediated sensations depended not on the body posture, but rather on the external spatial configuration formed by the pattern of thermal stimuli in each posture
Vestibular inputs modulate somatosensory cortical processing.
No full textThe vestibular system is unique among the senses because of the entirely multisensory nature of its cortical projections. Neuroanatomical and neuroimaging studies show that vestibular stimulation activates somatosensory areas, and particularly the so-called parieto-insular vestibular cortex (PIVC) in the monkey, while deactivating visual areas. Further, recent psychophysical studies showed that vestibular stimulation facilitates detection of electrocutaneous stimuli, suggesting a vestibular-somatosensory perceptual interaction. However, the functional mechanism underlying this perceptual facilitation remains unclear. We therefore recorded somatosensory potentials evoked by left median nerve stimulation, before and immediately after left cold caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS), in a small-scale study of eight healthy volunteers. CVS selectively enhanced the N80 component recorded over both ipsilateral and contralateral somatosensory areas, without significantly affecting earlier or later components. Interestingly, the N80 component has been localised to the parietal operculum, which includes the human homologue of the monkey PIVC, and is thus a prime neuroanatomical candidate for vestibular-somatosensory convergence. As a control, we measured visual evoked potentials to reversing checkerboard patterns and found no effects of vestibular stimulation. This rules out explanations based on indirect effects of vestibular modulations, such as general arousal or supramodal spatial attention. We believe our results provide the first clue linking brain structure to function for the interaction between vestibular and somatosensory systems
Seeing and feeling for self and other: proprioceptive spatial location determines multisensory enhancement of touch.
No full textWe have investigated the relation between visuo-tactile interactions and the self-other distinction. In the visual enhancement of touch (VET) effect, non-informative vision of one's own hand improves tactile spatial perception. Previous studies suggested that looking at another person's hand could also enhance tactile perception, but did not systematically investigate the basis of this effect. In experiment 1 we manipulated the spatial location where one's own or another person's hand was seen. Viewing one's own hand enhanced tactile orientation discrimination relative to viewing a neutral object, but only when the visual image of the hand was spatially aligned with the actual location of the participant's unseen hand, as signaled by proprioception. In contrast, viewing another person's hand produced enhanced tactile perception irrespective of spatial location. In experiment 2, we used a multisensory stimulation technique, known as visual remapping of touch (VRT), to reduce the spatial misalignment between the visual and proprioceptive locations of the hand. Participants saw an image of their own hand being touched at the same time as the tactile stimulation, which reduces perceived misalignment. This spatial adaptation procedure caused the VET effect to return. Our results suggest that multisensory modulation of touch depends on a representation of one's own body that is fundamentally spatial in nature. In contrast, representation of others is free from this spatial constrain
- …
