1,721,048 research outputs found
Gas exchange calculation may estimate changes in pulmonary blood flow during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a porcine model.
Full text linkBACKGROUND
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used as rescue for severe cardiopulmonary failure. We tested whether the ratio of CO2 elimination at the lung and the ECMO (VCO2ECMO/VCO2Lung) would reflect the ratio of respective blood flows and could be used to estimate changes in pulmonary blood flow (QLUNG), i. e. native cardiac output.
METHODS
Four healthy pigs were centrally cannulated for VA-ECMO. We measured blood flows with an ultrasonic flow probes. VCO2ECMO and VCO2Lung were calculated from sidestream capnographs under constant pulmonary ventilation during ECMO weaning with changing sweep gas and/or ECMO blood flow. If ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) ratio of ECMO was not one, the VCO2ECMO was normalized to V/Q=1 (VCO2ECMONORM). Changes in pulmonary blood flow were calculated using the relationship between changes in CO2 elimination and ECMO blood flow.
RESULTS
QECMO correlated strongly with VCO2ECMONORM (r2 0.95 - 0.99). QLUNG correlated well with VCO2LUNG (r2 0.65 - 0.89, p<=0.002). Absolute QLung could not be calculated in a non-steady state. Calculated pulmonary blood flow changes had a bias of 76 (-266 to 418) ml/min and correlated with measured QLUNG (r2 0.974 - 1.000, p = 0.1 to 0.006) for cumulative ECMO flow reductions.
CONCLUSIONS
VCO2 of the lung correlated strongly with pulmonary blood flow. Our model could predict pulmonary blood flow changes within clinically acceptable margins of error. The prediction is made possible with a normalization to a V/Q of 1 for ECMO. This approach depends on measurements readily available and may allow immediate assessment of the cardiac output response
Comment on: "A novel 'shunt fraction' method to derive native cardiac output during liberation from central VA ECMO" by Lim, HS.
Full text linkAnesthesia and analgesia protocol during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: it is time to build evidence
No full textIntegral Assessment of Gas Exchange During Veno-Arterial ECMO - Accuracy and Precision of a Modified Fick Principle in a Porcine Model.
Full text linkAssessment of native cardiac output during extracorporeal circulation is challenging. We assessed a modified Fick principle under conditions such as deadspace and shunt in 13 anesthetized swine undergoing centrally canulated veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO, 308 measurement periods) therapy. We assumed that the ratio of carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO2) or oxygen uptake (V̇O2) between the membrane and native lung corresponds to the ratio of respective blood flows. Unequal ventilation/perfusion (V̇/Q̇) ratios were corrected towards unity. Pulmonary blood flow was calculated and compared to an ultrasonic flow probe on the pulmonary artery with a bias of 99 mL/min (limits of agreement -542 to 741 mL/min) with blood content VO2 and no-shunt, no-deadspace conditions, which showed good trending ability (least significant change from 82 to 129 mL). Shunt conditions led to underestimation of native pulmonary blood flow (bias -395, limits of agreement -1290 to 500 mL/min). Bias and trending further depended on the gas (O2, CO2), and measurement approach (blood content vs. gas phase). Measurements in the gas phase increased the bias (253 [LoA -1357 to 1863 mL/min] for expired V̇O2 bias 482 [LoA -760 to 1724 mL/min] for expired V̇CO2) and could be improved by correction of V̇/Q̇ inequalities. Our results show that common assumptions of the Fick principle in two competing circulations give results with adequate accuracy and may offer a clinically applicable tool. Precision depends on specific conditions. This highlights the complexity of gas exchange in membrane lungs and may further deepen the understanding of V-A ECMO
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
