1,720,972 research outputs found
Pictorial history of anesthesia at the American University of Beirut.
No full text[No abstract available
Outcome measures for orthopaedic interventions on the hip
No full textOrthopaedic outcome measures are used to evaluate the effect of operative interventions. They are used for audit and research. Knowledge of these measures is becoming increasingly important with league tables comparing surgeons and hospitals being made accessible to the profession and the general public. Several types of tool are available to describe outcome after hip surgery such as generic quality-of-life questionnaires, disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaires, hip-specific outcome measures and general short-term clinical measures. We provide an overview of the outcome measures commonly used to evaluate hip intervention
Re: An Institution Par Excellence: Prof. B. Ramamurthi 1922-2003. Surg Neurol 2004;61:511-14 [1]
No full text[No abstract available]0
History of anesthesia in Lebanon and at the American University of Beirut
No full text[No abstract available
Retropharyngeal lipoma, a benign yet potentially lethal condition: Case presentation and review of the literature
No full textRetropharyngeal masses are benign or malignant. Because of their location, even the most benign lesion may behave in such a manner as to endanger life by compressing and obstructing the air and-or food passages. The case of an elderly woman whose life was endangered because of excessive hypercarbia, severe dysphagia, weight loss, and excessive daytime sleepiness secondary to a rare retropharyngeal benign mass, a lipoma, is presented. The literature is reviewed, and all the available cases are tabulated. Copyright © 2005 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Abdullah BJJ, 1997, BRIT J RADIOL, V70, P1063; Akhtar J, 2001, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V258, P458, DOI 10.1007-s004050100372; Aland JW, 1996, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V114, P628, DOI 10.1016-S0194-5998(96)70257-7; BALL H, 1856, LANCET, V1, P51; Barry B, 2000, Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, V117, P322; BLANSHARD JD, 1989, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V103, P429, DOI 10.1017-S002221510010917X; CAJETTI M, 1985, MINERVA CHIR, V40, P589; CHANDERMOHAN MD, 1991, INDIAN J CANC, V28, P162; Di Girolamo S, 1998, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V56, P1003; DOOMS GC, 1985, RADIOLOGY, V157, P479; EISELE DW, 1988, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V10, P416, DOI 10.1002-hed.2890100610; EISELE JH, 1967, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V28, P856, DOI 10.1097-00000542-196709000-00019; Erkan AN, 2004, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V130, P997, DOI 10.1001-archotol.130.8.997; FAULDER TH, 1924, BRIT MED J, V1, P424; FERRARI G, 1984, Acta Bio-Medica de l'Ateneo Parmense, V55, P315; FIGI FA, 1927, SURG CLIN N AM, V7, P1531; GERARD M, 1985, Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica, V39, P979; GOEBELCHIARI O, 2003, KRANHEITEN OBEREN LU, V2; GOLDMAN NC, 1970, LARYNGOSCOPE, V80, P1809; GOODMAN P, 1990, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V103, P476; Grand S, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P1793; HAJEK M, 1924, WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V37, P609; HELLENDALL H, 2003, BRUNS BEITR KLIN CHI, V36, P666; HICKMAN HH, 1912, BRIT MED J, V1, P843; Hockstein NG, 2002, LARYNGOSCOPE, V112, P1603, DOI 10.1097-00005537-200209000-00013; JOHNSON JT, 1987, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V96, P472; KENEFICK TC, 1974, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V80, P805; KENYON EL, 1912, LARYNGOSCOPE, V22, P158; KURILIN OV, 1976, ZH USHN NOS GORL BOL, V1, P111; LARSEN B, 1934, ACTA OTOLARYNGOL STO, V21, P93, DOI 10.3109-00016483409125913; Laus M, 1996, SPINE, V21, P1687, DOI 10.1097-00007632-199607150-00015; McFARLAND J C, 1948, Lancet, V1, P327; MCILRATH DC, 1963, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V116, P88; MENOWN IBA, 1992, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V106, P469, DOI 10.1017-S0022215100119875; OWENS DE, 1975, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V101, P565; PATTERSON N, 1933, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V48, P49; Paulsen H J, 1972, Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol, V51, P41; PFALZ GEW, 1918, LIPOME RECHENS; PITTS DB, 1989, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V100, P248; PIVOTTI G, 1953, Minerva Otorinolaringol, V3, P37; Prince MEP, 1997, J OTOLARYNGOL, V26, P139; PUTNEY FJ, 1940, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V49, P967; RETHI A, 1918, INT ZENTRALBLAT LARY, V34, P16; Rosell A, 1998, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V107, P726; SAHLBRANDT H D, 1955, HNO, V5, P154; SANCHIS RC, 1996, AN OTORRINOLARINGOL, V23, P389; SCHERL MP, 1985, SURG PATHOLOGY HEAD, P747; Schmal F, 2002, HNO, V50, P418, DOI 10.1007-s00106-001-0617-1; Senchenkov A, 2001, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V125, P658, DOI 10.1067-mhn.2001.120395; Shivakumar A. M., 2004, Indian Journal of Pediatrics, V71, P271, DOI 10.1007-BF02724283; SOM PM, 1986, AM J NEURORADIOL, V7, P657; TAYLOR F, 1877, T PATHOL SOC LOND, V28, P216; TOPPOZADA HH, 1975, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V89, P1151, DOI 10.1017-S0022215100081512; TSUKAMOTO K, 1996, HEAD NECK SURG, V68, P1076; Udovicki J, 1984, Med Pregl, V37, P247; VONBAUER E, 1969, MONATSSCHR OHRENHEIL, V103, P376; VONBIRNMEYER G, 1956, HNO, V6, P27; Wang YP, 2004, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V130, P383, DOI 10.1016-j.otohns.2003.08.001; Winckler C, 1976, Ann Anesthesiol Fr, V17, P765; Woods R, 1924, Br Med J, V1, P144; WTERS RM, 1927, CAN MED ASSOC J, V17, P1510; Yoshihara T, 1998, J OTOLARYNGOL, V27, P363; YOUNUS M, 1980, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V94, P321, DOI 10.1017-S0022215100088848; YUEH B, 1995, AM J OTOLARYNG, V16, P331, DOI 10.1016-0196-0709(95)90063-210
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
