1,720,961 research outputs found
Differential splicing of three gonadotropin-releasing hormone transcripts in the ovary of seabream (Sparus aurata).
Previous studies demonstrated the presence of high-affinity GnRH binding sites and compounds with GnRH-like activity in the ovary of seabream, Sparus aurata, providing evidence for the role of GnRH as a paracrine/autocrine regulator of ovarian function in this species. In the present study, the expression of three forms of GnRH (salmon, chicken-II, and seabream) genes in this marine teleost species was demonstrated for the first time. Moreover, there is evidence for differential splicing and intronic expression of cGnRH-II and sbGnRH. Treatment of seabream follicle-enclosed oocytes with salmon GnRH stimulated reinitiation of oocyte meiosis, whereas chicken GnRH-II treatment was without effect. Novel information was also provided about organization of cGnRH-II and seabream GnRH transcripts, confirming that GnRH gene organization is maintained through evolution, despite changes in the size and sequence of exons and intron
Presence and activity of compounds with GnRH-like activity in the ovary of seabream Sparus aurata.
The binding and activity of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) were characterized in the mature gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) ovary by use of an analogue of salmon GnRH([D-Arg6,Trp7,Leu8,Pro9-N(Et)]GnRH, sGnRH-A) as labeled ligand. The binding of 125I-sGnRH-A to the seabream ovarian membrane preparation was saturable, displaceable, reversible, and dependent on time, temperature and tissue concentration. Addition of unlabeled s-GnRH-A displaced the radio-ligand in a dose-related manner, indicating the presence of one class of high-affinity binding sites with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 45.5 +/- 6.2 nM. Addition of other GnRH peptides, including salmon GnRH ([Trp7,Leu8]GnRH) and chicken GnRH-II ([His5,Trp7,Tyr8]GnRH), also displaced 125I-sGnRH-A; all these peptides bound with lower affinities than sGnRH-A to the seabream ovarian binding site. In this study, we also demonstrated the presence of compounds with GnRH-like activity in the ovary of seabream. Seabream ovarian extract stimulated pituitary gonadotropin release from the goldfish pituitary and displaced 125I-sGnRH-A binding in the seabream ovary. Furthermore, addition of sGnRH-A to cultured seabream oocytes directly stimulated reinitiation of oocyte meiosis, as indicated by germinal vesicle breakdown. Overall, the present study characterizes GnRH-binding sites in the seabream ovary and supports the hypothesis that GnRH or compounds with GnRH-like activity play an autocrine/paracrine role in the regulation of ovarian function in the seabream ovary
Validation of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for Cyprinus carpio L. vitellogenin, as a biomarker of reproductive disorders
Hormonal mechanis regulating hepatic vitellogenin synthesis in the gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
