129 research outputs found
Brucellose et néo-rickettsiose chez la Brebis
No full textLafenêtre Henri, Vollhardt Yves, Quatrefages H. Brucellose et néo-rickettsiose chez la brebis. In: Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France tome 111 n°8, 1958. pp. 473-476
Les limites de la protection vaccinale antibrucellique chez la brebis
No full textLafenêtre Henri, Carrère Louis, Cortez A., Vollhardt Yves, Quatrefages H. Les limites de la protection vaccinale antibrucellique chez la Brebis. In: Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France tome 117 n°3, 1964. pp. 117-121
Vaccination des ovins contre la brucellose avec la souche vivante B. 112 (Culture en bouillon)
No full textLafenêtre Henri, Carrère Louis, Cortez A., Vollhardt Yves, Quatrefages H. Vaccinations des ovins contre la Brucellose avec la souche vivante B. 112 (Culture en bouillon). In: Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France tome 114 n°1, 1961. pp. 57-62
Vaccins anti-brucelliques tués et allergie dans l’espèce ovine
No full textLafenêtre Henri, Carrère Louis, Petitdidier M., Vollhardt Yves, Quatrefages H. Vaccins anti-brucelliques tués et allergie dans l’espèce ovine. In: Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France tome 117 n°4, 1964. pp. 189-191
Efficacité comparée de cinq vaccins antibrucelliques chez la Brebis
No full textLafenêtre Henri, Carrère Louis, Cortez A., Vollhardt Yves, Quatrefages H. Efficacité comparée de cinq vaccins antibrucelliques chez la brebis. In: Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France tome 115 n°8, 1962. pp. 319-324
Durée de la survie des Brucella dans le fromage de Roquefort
No full textCarrère Louis, Lafenêtre Henri, Quatrefages H., De Noronha Fernando. Durée de la survie des Brucella dans le fromage de Roquefort. In: Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France tome 113 n°8, 1960. pp. 469-473
Petaloproctus Quatrefages 1865
No full textGenus Petaloproctus Quatrefages, 1865 Genus Petaloproctus Quatrefages, 1865: 247. Type species: Petaloproctus terriculus Quatrefages, 1865. Maldane Grübe, 1860: 92; Lumbriclymene Sars 1872: 413; Nicomachella Levinsen, 1883: 146. 24. Petaloproctus borealis Arwidsson, 1907: 118 –122, pl. 3, figs. 85–90, pl. 8, 268–272. Type: NSMT K 97 – 11–125 (1). Type locality: North Sea. Petaloproctus tenuis var. borealis Arwidsson, 1907: 118 –122, pl. 3, figs. 85–90, pl. 8, 268–272. Petaloproctus borealis: Hartman 1948: 42; Uschakov 1955: 339, figs. 125 h; Hartmann-Schröder 1971: 413 – 412, figs. 151 a–d; Hobson and Banse 1981: 76, fig. 17 f; Imajima and Shiraki 1982: 44 –46, figs. 19 a–k; Buzhinskaja 1985: 163; Imajima 2001: 86. Geographic distribution: North Sea, Japan (Suruga Bay to Korea Strait), Okhotsk Sea, Pacific coast of North America. Remarks: Imajima and Shiraki (1982) elevated the taxonomic status of the variety Petaloproctus tenuis var. borealis Arwidsson, 1907 to the specific rank Petaloproctus borealis, emphasizing that the variety is clearly distinguishable, by having 20 setigerous segments and an anal plate with a crenulated margin, while P. tenuis has 21 setigerous segments and an anal plate with a smooth margin. 26. Petaloproctus dentatus Imajima and Shiraki, 1982: 42 –44, figs. 18 a–n. Holotype: NSMT –Pol. H 159. Paratypes: NSMT –Pol. 160, NSMT K 97 – 11-250 (19), NSMT K 97 - 11–300 (2), NSMT K 98 – 1–250 (3). Type locality: Japan. Petaloproctus dentatus: Imajima 2001: 87. Geographic distribution: Known only from the type locality. 27. Petaloproctus macrodentatus Lee and Paik, 1986: 23, fig. 7 a–g. Holotype: 1009 KORDI. Type locality: Yellow Sea, Korea. Geographic distribution: Known only from the type locality. 28. Petaloproctus neoborealis Hartman, 1969: 471, figs. 1–3. Holotype: not mentioned in description. Type locality: Off San Diego, California, USA, (32 ° 3112 N; 11808 30 W). Geographic distribution: Known only from the type locality. 29. Petaloproctus ornatus Hartman, 1969: 473, figs. 1–4. Holotype not mentioned in description. Type locality: Palos Verdes Point, California, USA, (334800 N; 11832 0 0 W). Petaloproctus ornatus: Hartman 1955: 19.1, fig. 46. Geographic distribution: Known only from the type locality. 30. Petaloproctus socialis Andrews, 1891: 295 –296, pl. 7, figs. 36–41. Type: EL–ECOSUR 2782. Type locality: North Carolina. Petaloproctus socialis: Hartman 1945: 40, pl. 8, figs. 3–4; Jimnez-Cueto and Salazar-Vallejo 1997: 1463, figs. a–c; Amaral, Nallin and Steiner 2006: 6, catalogue. Geographic distribution: Northwestern Caribbean to North Carolina and South America, Brazil. 31. Petaloproctus tenuis (Théel, 1879): 57, figs. 52–54. Type: NMG, number not mentioned; CNRS St. 1425 (5), 426 (2), 451 (4); USNM 10486. Type locality: Cape Cod Bay, Massachusetts, USA. Maldane tenuis Théel, 1879: 57, figs. 52–54. Maldane filifera Verrill, 1880: 179. Lumbriclymene filifera (Verrill, 1880) Verrill 1900: 659. Petaloproctus filifer (Verrill, 1880) Arwidsson, 1907: 141 Petaloproctus tenuis: Eliason 1920: 66; Annenkova 1937: 181; Hartman 1942: 42; 1948: 42; Berkeley and Berkeley 1952: 56, figs. 114–116; Pettibone 1954: 306 –307, figs. 34 l–m; Rullier 1965: 194; Amoureux 1982: 198; Buzhinskaja 1985: 163; Lee and Paik 1986: 23, tab. Geographic distribution: Off Cape Cod, Massachusetts; East Greenland; Spitsbergen; north Japan Sea; Novaya Zelmya; British Columbia to southeastern Alaska; Arctic, (Pettibone 1954; Lee and Paik 1986). 32. Petaloproctus terriculus Quatrefages, 1865: 247. Syntypes: USMN – POLY – TYPE 281–284. Type locality: France. Petaloproctus terriculus: Fauvel 1927: 194, fig. 68; Day 1955: 429; 1967: 622–623, figs. 30.2a–d; Rullier 1965: 194, without figs.; Solis-Weiss et al. 2004: appendix S 7. Nicomache macintosh Marenzeller, 1887: 19, pl. 1, fig. 8. Petaloproctus macintosh Augener, 1918: 491. Geographic distribution: East Atlantic from Angola to the English Channel.Published as part of Assis, José Eriberto De, Alonso, Carmen & Christoffersen, Martin Lindsey, 2007, A catalogue and taxonomic keys of the Subfamily Nicomachinae (Polychaeta: Maldanidae) of the world, pp. 41-55 in Zootaxa 1657 on pages 47-48, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17986
Aspidosiphon (Paraspidosiphon) coyi de Quatrefages 1865
No full textAspidosiphon (Paraspidosiphon) coyi Quatrefages, 1865: 608–609, as Aspidosiphon coyi; type locality: Indian Ocean. — Keferstein 1867: 50–53, pl. 6, figs 15–18, as Phascolosoma truncatum (probably Panama and Galapagos Islands, without specification by the author). Questionable record in the TEP.Published as part of Silva-Morales, Itzahí & Gómez-Vásquez, Julio D., 2021, First records and two new species of sipunculans (Sipuncula) from the Southern Mexican Pacific, pp. 77-117 in European Journal of Taxonomy 740 (1) on page 113, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.740.1283, http://zenodo.org/record/464319
Enzootie de tumeurs cutanées chez le lièvre
No full textLafenêtre Henri, Cortez A., Rioux J.-A., Pages A., Vollhardt Yves, Quatrefages H. Enzootie de tumeurs cutanées chez le lièvre. In: Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France tome 113 n°7, 1960. pp. 379-389
Thelepus setosus Quatrefages 1866
No full textThelepus setosus (Quatrefages, 1866) (Figs 1–2) Phenacia setosa Quatrefages 1866: 376 –377. Thelepus setosus Hilbig 2000: 231 –294. Material examined. Holotype (MNHN type 464): Atlantic Ocean, northern coast of France, Normandie, Saint Vaast; slides: uncini segs 9, 19, 33 and 75; notochaetae segs 51 and 53. Description. Holotype in excellent state of preservation, complete, with ~93 segments, ~ 110 mm long, 3.9 mm wide at widest point (segment 19); body progressively wider until segment 19, then of uniform width through 1. not Pseudothelepus nyanganus Augener, 1918, which is a species of Streblosoma. segment 22, strongly tapering on segments 23–29, then uniformly cylindrical (~ 1 mm wide) through posterior body, slightly tapering near pygidium (Fig. 1 A–B). Transverse prostomium attached to dorsal surface of upper lip; basal part of prostomium without eyespots (perhaps eyespots originally present, but faded out in holotype now); distal part of prostomium shelf-like, several buccal tentacles present (Fig. 1 A–H), longest tentacles accidentally removed due to manipulation, but originally reaching ~segment 14 if directed posteriorly. Peristomium restricted to lips, not continuing dorsally; upper lip wider than long, with almost straight margins; rectangular lower lip, surrounded by mid-ventral lobe originated from segment 1, holotype with pharyngeal organ everted (Fig. 1 A, C– D, F–H). Anterior body highly glandular ventrally, crenulate to slightly corrugated between neuropodia until segment 9 (Fig. 1 A, C–D, F–H); segment 1 with dorsal crest originating from anterior margin and ventral lobe around lower lip; segments 2–7 progressively longer, segment 3 distinctly shorter ventrally than segments 2 and 4 (possibly another artefact, due to muscular contraction at time of preservation), then segments progressively increasing in length very slightly until segment 19; progressively less marked ventral crests on anterior margins of segments 2–7 (Fig. 1 A–H). Three pairs of branchiae, on segments 2–4, at most 20 filaments (considering scars) on segment 2, 10–15 on segment 3 and less than 10 on segment 4; origin of filaments of segment 2 extending slightly laterally to level of notopodia, those of following segments originating dorsally to level of notopodia; filaments of either side within pairs separated by distinctly narrow mid-dorsal gap, almost inconspicuous on segment 2; filaments originating directly from body wall, no cushion-like areas present (but body wall slightly swollen at point of insertion); filaments gently curled, reaching in length at most half of body width at corresponding segment (Fig. 1 B–C, E–G). Notopodia present on segments 3–56; notopodia of segments 3–8 inserted very slightly progressively more laterally, then longitudinally aligned (Fig. 1 B–C, E–G); notopodia progressively shorter from mid-body, last pairs almost inconspicuous; most chaetae shaved off, entire chaetae only present on posterior notopodia; narrowly-winged notochaetae in both rows, well marked difference in length between rows, wings only present on distal halves of chaetae, broader at base, lanceolated (Fig. 2 A–B). Neuropodia as fleshy ridges on anterior body, progressively narrower and more raised from mid-body segments, as narrow pinnules after termination of notopodia (Fig. 1 C, F–G, I), internal support rods only present after notopodia terminate; uncini with terminal dorsal button, remarkably short prow, as protruding triangular knob, crest with 2 rows of secondary teeth, basal row with 2 large teeth, distal row with single minute tooth in between teeth of first row, and strongly convex base, with medial indentation (Fig. 2 C–G). Distinctly small nephridial and genital papillae, posterior to bases of notopodia and between parapodial lobes of segments 4–7 (Fig. 1 E–G). Pygidium smooth (Fig. 1 A, I). Remarks. The study of the holotype of T. setosus revealed an important mistake in the original description. According to Quatrefages (1866) the holotype has 45–46 thoracic segments and 34–35 abdominal ones, while it in fact has ~93 segments, with notopodia present until the segment 56 (= “thorax”), but thorax and abdomen are not well defined in this species, as the uniformly cilindrical region begins well before the termination of notopodia (see Nogueira et al. 2010, 2013), meaning there are ~37 abdominal segments, the last ones in formation, very compacted and difficult to count. Besides the number of thoracic and abdominal segments, the original description only provides some unclear information about the insertion of the branchial filaments (Quatrefages 1866). Finally, the description above says eyespots are absent, but this may be an artefact due to the holotype being in ethanol for more than 150 years. Perhaps eyespots were originally present, but they are completely faded now, only remaining a thin darker line at base of basal part of prostomium (Fig. 1 G). Type locality. Atlantic Ocean, France, Normandy, St. Vaast.Published as part of Carrerette, Orlemir, Nogueira, João Miguel De Matos & Hutchings, Pat, 2017, The genus Thelepus Leuckart, 1849 (Annelida, Thelepodidae) in Brazil, with a redescription of the holotype of T. setosus (Quatrefages, 1866), pp. 587-599 in Zootaxa 4250 (6) on pages 588-590, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4250.6.6, http://zenodo.org/record/49587
- …
