1,721,692 research outputs found

    H. Brunner-Lachaux. Somašambhiipaddhati

    No full text
    Bareau André. H. Brunner-Lachaux. Somašambhiipaddhati. In: Revue de l'histoire des religions, tome 177, n°2, 1970. p. 237

    H. Brunner, Mithio und sperantes.

    No full text
    Tardif Adolphe. H. Brunner, Mithio und sperantes.. In: Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes. 1885, tome 46. pp. 160-161

    H. Brunner, Ueber das Alter der Lex Alamannorum.

    No full text
    Tardif Adolphe. H. Brunner, Ueber das Alter der Lex Alamannorum.. In: Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes. 1885, tome 46. pp. 161-162

    Binding, Handbuch der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft. — H. Brunner, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte, erster Band.

    No full text
    Tardif Adolphe. Binding, Handbuch der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft. — H. Brunner, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte, erster Band.. In: Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes. 1887, tome 48. pp. 582-587

    Vercheigle von Gesunheissystemen. Italien

    No full text
    Analisi dell'assetto istituzionale della geografia dei servizi e dei meccanismi di finanziamento del SS

    sj-docx-3-wmr-10.1177_0734242X231172104 – Supplemental material for Improving waste management by focussing on goals: A mini review of the publication sector

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-wmr-10.1177_0734242X231172104 for Improving waste management by focussing on goals: A mini review of the publication sector by Paul H Brunner, Astrid Unterberger and Johann Fellner in Waste Management & Research</p

    sj-docx-1-wmr-10.1177_0734242X231172104 – Supplemental material for Improving waste management by focussing on goals: A mini review of the publication sector

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-wmr-10.1177_0734242X231172104 for Improving waste management by focussing on goals: A mini review of the publication sector by Paul H Brunner, Astrid Unterberger and Johann Fellner in Waste Management & Research</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore