1,722,018 research outputs found
07/19/1948 Guy P. Ladouceur Correspondence
Get PDFCorrespondence from Guy P. Ladouceur, Manager of the Lewiston Chamber of Commerce, regarding research by Dr. E. L. Thorndike.
Letter 1: Letter from Guy P. Ladouceur to the Secretary of they New York Academy of Science. Letter
2: Letter from Guy P. Ladouceur to Harcourt Brace & Co..https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/fac-lpg-letters-1948-07-12/1022/thumbnail.jp
07/08/1948 Guy P. Ladouceur Correspondence with Columbia University
Get PDFCorrespondence between Guy P. Ladouceur, Manager of the Lewiston Chamber of Commerce, and Columbia University regarding a survey of living conditions in larger cities by Dr. E. L. Thorndike.
Letter 1: Letter from Guy P. Ladouceur to Columbia University dated 07/08/1948.
Letter 2: Letter from Irving Lorge of Columbia University to Guy P. Ladouceur dated 07/16/1948.https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/fac-lpg-letters-1948-07-12/1019/thumbnail.jp
1948 Guy P. Ladouceur Broadcast Transcript
Get PDFA closing announcment transcript from a radio broadcast by from Guy P. Ladoceur, Manager of the Lewiston Chamber of Commerce.https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/fac-lpg-letters-1948-01-06/1060/thumbnail.jp
Guy P. Webb
No full textThe Oklahoma A&M College World War I Veterans collection captures the memories and experiences of the men and women of Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College who served in World War I. In 1919, a project headed by Maude Cass, the editor of the 1919 Redskin; Professor Maroney of the Department of History; Margaret Walters, Librarian; and J.W. Cantwell, the College President, was undertaken to survey these veterans. The surveys were returned along with photographs, letters, and newspaper clippings documenting these veterans’ experiences during World War I
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
