1,721,076 research outputs found
ERL-110129-Stratton-et-al-Figure-2-data
No full textExcel spreadsheet used to produce Figure 2 in the manuscript entitled: "Mitigating sustainability tradeoffs as global fruit and vegetable systems expand to meet dietary recommendations" by Stratton, Anne Elise; Finley, John; Gustafson, David; Mitcham, Elizabeth; Myers, Samuel; Naylor, Rosamond; Otten, Jennifer J.; Palm, Chery
Get to Know Your Septic Tank
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from the University of Minnesota Extension: https://www.extension.umn.edu.Machmeier, Roger E.; Gustafson, David M.. (1991). Get to Know Your Septic Tank. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/178435
An Empirical Study of the Impact of Cognitive Style and Time on Interactive Medical DSS Use
No full textAn Empirical Study of Parceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use on Computerized Support System Use Over Time
No full textSeptic System: Owner's Guide
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from the University of Minnesota Extension: https://www.extension.umn.edu.Olson, Kenneth; Gustafson, David; Liukkonen, Barbara; Cook, Victoria. (1997). Septic System: Owner's Guide. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/178514
Landscaping Septic Systems
Get PDFFO-6986-B 1998Meyer, Mary H.; Pedersen, Brad; Jaster, Marguerite; Anderson, James; Olson, Kenneth M.; Gustafson, David M.. (1998). Landscaping Septic Systems. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/219501
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
