1,721,013 research outputs found
Impatiophila sikkimensis Gupta & Gupta 1991, comb. nov.
No full text26) Impatiophila sikkimensis (Gupta & Gupta, 1991), comb. nov. Drosophila sikkimensis Gupta & Gupta, 1991: 62. Diagnosis. Abdominal tergites with “light brown bands”; II and III with “medially interrupted bands”; IV and V with “completely bands” (Gupta & Gupta, 1991). Scutum “pale brown to shining dark brown, with a obscure lightly brown longitudinal stripe” (Gupta & Gupta, 1991). Distribution. India (Sikkim).Published as part of Fu, Zhao, Toda, Masanori J., Li, Nan-Nan, Zhang, Ya-Ping & Gao, Jian-Jun, 2016, A new genus of anthophilous drosophilids, Impatiophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae): morphology, DNA barcoding and molecular phylogeny, with descriptions of thirty-nine new species, pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4120 (1) on page 61, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4120.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/26683
Wardianum chauhani Gupta & Gupta 1979
No full textW. chauhani Gupta & Gupta, 1979 Type host. Common snipe, Gallinago gallinago (Linnaeus) (Syn. Capella gallinago Linnaeus) (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae). Type locality. Kanpur, Utter Pradesh, India. Remarks. No oral or ventral sucker described—Gupta & Gupta (1979).Published as part of Dronen, Norman O. & Blend, Charles K., 2015, Updated keys to the genera in the subfamilies of Cyclocoelidae Stossich, 1902, including a reconsideration of species assignments, species keys and the proposal of a new genus in Szidatitreminae Dronen, 2007, pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4053 (1) on page 49, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4053.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/23711
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Morishitium rauschi Gupta & Gupta 1979
No full text<i>M</i>. <i>rauschi</i> Gupta & Gupta, 1979 <p> <b>Type host.</b> Common snipe, <i>Gallinago</i> <i>gallinago</i> (Linnaeus) (Syn. <i>Capella gallinago</i> Linnaeus) (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae).</p> <p> <b>Type locality.</b> Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> No oral or ventral sucker present—Gupta & Gupta (1979).</p>Published as part of <i>Dronen, Norman O. & Blend, Charles K., 2015, Updated keys to the genera in the subfamilies of Cyclocoelidae Stossich, 1902, including a reconsideration of species assignments, species keys and the proposal of a new genus in Szidatitreminae Dronen, 2007, pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4053 (1)</i> on page 75, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4053.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/237117">http://zenodo.org/record/237117</a>
Eotetranychus communis Gupta & Gupta 1994
No full text38. <i>Eotetranychus communis</i> Gupta & Gupta, 1994 <p> <i>Eotetranychus communis</i> Gupta & Gupta, 1994: 60.</p> <p> <b>Type host</b> – <i>Pyrus communis</i>.</p> <p> <b>Type locality</b> – India.</p> <p> <b>Distribution</b> – Rajasthan and Uttar pradesh.</p> <p> <b>Host</b> – <i>Pyrus communis.</i></p>Published as part of <i>Chalil, Suada Poolayulla, Kunnathattil, Maneesha, Kaimal, Sangeetha G. & Punathil, Thejass, 2024, A checklist of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) of India, pp. 29-75 in Persian Journal of Acarology 13 (1)</i> on page 42, DOI: 10.22073/pja.v13i1.78022, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10943449">http://zenodo.org/record/10943449</a>
Eotetranychus indicus Gupta & Gupta 1990
No full text45. <i>Eotetranychus indicus</i> Gupta & Gupta, 1990 <p> <i>Eotetranychus indicus</i> Gupta & Gupta, 1990: 20.</p> <p> <b>Type host</b> – <i>Pyrus communis</i>.</p> <p> <b>Type locality</b> – India.</p> <p> <b>Distribution</b> – Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.</p>Published as part of <i>Chalil, Suada Poolayulla, Kunnathattil, Maneesha, Kaimal, Sangeetha G. & Punathil, Thejass, 2024, A checklist of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) of India, pp. 29-75 in Persian Journal of Acarology 13 (1)</i> on page 43, DOI: 10.22073/pja.v13i1.78022, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10943449">http://zenodo.org/record/10943449</a>
Tetranychus udaipurensis Gupta & Gupta 1994
No full text133. <i>Tetranychus udaipurensis</i> Gupta & Gupta, 1994 <p> <i>Tetranychus udaipurensis</i> Gupta & Gupta, 1994: 137.</p> <p> <b>Type host</b> – <i>Solanum melongena.</i></p> <p> <b>Type locality</b> – India.</p> <p> <b>Distribution</b> – Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu.</p> <p> <b>Hosts</b> – <i>Asystasia gangetica, Diplocyclos palmatus</i> and Malvaceous weed.</p>Published as part of <i>Chalil, Suada Poolayulla, Kunnathattil, Maneesha, Kaimal, Sangeetha G. & Punathil, Thejass, 2024, A checklist of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) of India, pp. 29-75 in Persian Journal of Acarology 13 (1)</i> on page 63, DOI: 10.22073/pja.v13i1.78022, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10943449">http://zenodo.org/record/10943449</a>
- …
