125,017 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Raised hematocrit--a contributing factor to hepatic artery thrombosis following liver transplantation.
No full text
Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology
No full textTo unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.Peer reviewe
Dr. Edwin Wright Collection: Author Unknown
No full textNotes - The author relates several short stories about his neighbours including Alex McDonell, homesteading and life around Meanook and Athabasca (1 page
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: UK single centre study
No full textAim of the study is to assess the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) after liver transplantation (LT) in DCD vs. DBD recipients. Methods: this is a retrospective single-centre study of 1151 patients who underwent LT from 2007 to 2014. Exclusion criteria: urgent (=66) and living donor (=7) LT. We considered: renal function pre-LT, daily within one week post-operatively, at 1, 3, 4, 6, 9 months and 1, 3, 5 years post-LT, characteristics of recipient, donor type, graft variables and indicators of initial graft function. AKI and CKD defined and classified on the basis of KDIGO Guidelines (2012).
Results: we considered 1078 LT patients (830 DBD and 248 DCD). DBD recipients had a higher MELD (p=0.002) and pre-LT serum bilirubin level (p<0.001) than DCD but there were no differences in INR and serum creatinine values. DBD recipients had longer cold and recipient warm ischemia times than DCD (p<0.001 and p=0.018 respectively). The incidence of AKI was 57.9% (624/1078), of which 57.1% of DBD (474/830) vs. 60.5% of DCD (150/248). DCD recipients had a higher incidence of stage 3 AKI than DBD (20.6% vs. 12.7%, p=0.0197). Among patients with stage
3 AKI DCD had a higher cumulative incidence of CKD compared to DBD (SHR 1.6 (1.0-2.7), p=0.051).
Conclusion: For the first time we showed that both DBD and DCD recipients suffer a similar degree of stage 1-2 of AKI, but the DCD experience more severe stage 3 AKI, which is associated with a higher incidence of CKD in the long-term follow-up
The current state of liver and pancreas transplantation
No full textThe last 20 years have seen progressive developments in the field of clinical transplantation and in many countries kidney transplantation is now the most cost effective manner of treating renal failure. With increasing technical experience failures have become less common and newer immunosuppressive protocols incorporating cyclosporin A can frequently achieve a graft success rate of over 75% at one year with patient survival over 95%. In addition, the patient receiving a kidney graft attains a high quality of rehabilitation. If renal transplantation has now gained wide acceptance other forms of organ transplantation are still in a phase of development and have not yet reached wide acceptance. It is the purpose of this review to present briefly the current clinical status of two forms of solid organ transplantation being employed in clinical practice
- …
