1,721,012 research outputs found

    Reflectance confocal microscopy role in mycosis fungoides follow-up

    No full text
    Background: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a useful tool for many skin cancers, allowing non-invasive evaluation over time and identifying areas of active disease. Its role to follow-up mycosis fungoides (MF) patients has not yet been evaluated. Objective: To assess the level of agreement between RCM and histopathology and to develop a RCM checklist that could help monitoring MF patients. Method: Prospective study in a cutaneous lymphoma clinic of a tertiary hospital in Australia. RCM and biopsies were performed on the same area at baseline, before commencing or changing treatment, and at 6 months after starting treatment. Normal skin sites were also analysed and acted as controls. RCM features and histopathological findings were blindly evaluated by the confocalist and pathologist. Correlation between RCM and histology was measured by overall per cent of agreement (OPA), kappa and ROC curves. Additionally, RCM images before and after treatment were assessed blinded from clinical information and correlated to clinical assessment. Results: Thirty-eight MF lesions were included. Nineteen of these 38 were re-assessed by RCM 6 months later. Fifty biopsies were performed (38 at baseline and 12 after 6 months). The combination of four RCM features corresponding to Pautrier's microabscess, epidermal and junctional lymphocytes and interface dermatitis formed the RCM checklist for MF that predicted the severity of disease with AUC of 0.95 (P =.003). Conclusion: Reflectance confocal microscopy can assess activity within a lesion and over time and assist in the clinical management of patients with MF

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Hyporeflective pagetoid cells: A new clue for amelanotic melanoma diagnosis by reflectance confocal microscopy

    No full text
    Background Amelanotic melanoma represents a diagnostic challenge both clinically and dermoscopically. Few studies based on case series have explored the possibility of using reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) to diagnose amelanotic melanoma. Objectives To validate a new confocal feature, named hyporeflective pagetoid cells (HPCs), for the diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma. Methods A group of 20 amelanotic melanomas and a control population of nonpigmented melanocytic naevi (10), hypo/nonpigmented nonmelanocytic lesions (20) and pigmented melanomas (20), imaged by RCM, were retrospectively evaluated. The presence of HPCs and other diagnosis-specific confocal features was assessed and correlated with histopathology. Results HPCs were present, and usually abundant, in the majority of amelanotic melanomas (85%). As expected, they were also observed in Spitz naevi. On histopathology, they were correlated with pagetoid infiltration of hypomelanotic melanocytes in all melanocytic lesions. Few nonmelanocytic lesions (three squamous cell carcinomas, two seborrhoeic keratoses and one basal cell carcinoma) showed the presence of HPCs. In these cases, they corresponded to enlarged or dyskeratotic keratinocytes by histopathology. Conclusions The identification of HPCs in the epidermis is a new parameter that is frequently found in amelanotic melanoma. Possible confounders are represented by atypical keratinocytes that can be present in nonmelanocytic lesions. However, the whole architecture and the presence of additional diagnostic criteria should be considered in order to obtain a correct diagnosis. What's already known about this topic? Amelanotic and hypopigmented lesions can be readily evaluated by means of confocal microscopy. Few reports have explored the characteristic confocal aspects of amelanotic melanoma as seen by confocal microscopy. What does this study add? We define a new descriptor, named hypomelanotic pagetoid cells, as a clue for differentiating amelanotic melanoma from other benign and malignant nonpigmented lesions. © 2013 British Association of Dermatologists

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy are complementary techniques for diagnosis of difficult amelanotic and light-coloured skin lesions

    No full text
    Background: Amelanotic melanomas are often difficult to diagnose. Objectives: To find and test the best methods of diagnosis using dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) tools. Methods: We selected consecutive, difficult-to-diagnose, light-coloured and amelanotic skin lesions from three centres (in Australia and Italy). Dermoscopy and RCM diagnostic utility were evaluated under blinded conditions utilizing 45 melanomas (16 in situ, 29 invasive), 68 naevi, 48 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 10 actinic keratoses, 10 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 13 other benign lesions. Results: Sensitivity and specificity for melanoma with dermoscopy pattern analysis by two blinded observers and their âconfidence in diagnosisâ were low. The amelanotic dermoscopy method had the highest sensitivity (83%) for a diagnosis of malignancy (melanoma, BCC or SCC), but specificity was only 18%. Multivariate analysis confirmed the utility of RCM features previously identified for the diagnosis of BCC and melanoma (highest odds ratio for melanoma: epidermal disarray, dark and/or round pagetoid cells). RCM sensitivity was 67% and 73% for melanoma and BCC diagnosis, respectively, and its specificity for nonmalignant lesion diagnosis was 56%. RCM reader confidence was higher than for dermoscopy; 84% of melanomas would have been biopsied and biopsy avoided in 47% of benign lesions. All melanomas misclassified by either dermoscopy or RCM were detected by the other tool. Conclusions: Dermoscopy and RCM represent complementary/synergistic methods for diagnosis of amelanotic/light-coloured skin lesions

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore