1,721,329 research outputs found
Fig. 9 in Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain
No full textFig. 9. Discriminant analysis, based on three cranial variables. DF1 – 82.8% of variance, DF2 – 17.2 % of variance.Published as part of Groves, C. P. & Meijaard, E., 2005, Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain, pp. 413-422 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology (suppl 12) s12 on page 417, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.718740
Fig. 5 in Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain
No full textFig. 5. Size differences between samples, as represented by Condylobasallength (in mm).Published as part of Groves, C. P. & Meijaard, E., 2005, Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain, pp. 413-422 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology (suppl 12) s12 on page 416, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.718740
Fig. 4 in Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain
No full textFig. 4. Relative hindfoot to head plus body length (in mm)Published as part of Groves, C. P. & Meijaard, E., 2005, Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain, pp. 413-422 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology (suppl 12) s12 on page 415, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.718740
Figure 1 in A taxonomic revision of the Tragulus mouse-deer (Artiodactyla)
No full textFigure 1. Measurement details of Tragulus skulls and mandibles (letters refer to text).Published as part of Meijaard, E. & Groves, C. P., 2004, A taxonomic revision of the Tragulus mouse-deer (Artiodactyla), pp. 63-102 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140 (1) on page 66, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00091.x, http://zenodo.org/record/543975
Figure 10 in A taxonomic revision of the Tragulus mouse-deer (Artiodactyla)
No full textFigure 10. Discriminant analysis of adult T. javanicus-like specimens, with corresponding correlation matrix.Published as part of Meijaard, E. & Groves, C. P., 2004, A taxonomic revision of the Tragulus mouse-deer (Artiodactyla), pp. 63-102 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140 (1) on page 78, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00091.x, http://zenodo.org/record/543975
Figure 8. Bivariate plots for reputed T in A taxonomic revision of the Tragulus mouse-deer (Artiodactyla)
No full textFigure 8. Bivariate plots for reputed T. napu specimens from the small Sundaland islands.Published as part of Meijaard, E. & Groves, C. P., 2004, A taxonomic revision of the Tragulus mouse-deer (Artiodactyla), pp. 63-102 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140 (1) on page 76, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00091.x, http://zenodo.org/record/543975
Fig. 8 in Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain
No full textFig. 8. Distance between bullae compared to bulla width (in mm).Published as part of Groves, C. P. & Meijaard, E., 2005, Interspecific Variation In Moschiola, The Indian Chevrotain, pp. 413-422 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology (suppl 12) s12 on page 417, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.718740
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
