1,721,031 research outputs found
A new breakable stent for recoarctation in early infancy: Preliminary Clinical Experience
No full textObjectivesTranscatheter treatment of aortic coarctation (CoA) via stent implantation has become an established treatment option depending on the patient's age and CoA type. BackgroundThe Osypka BabyStent((R)) is a low-profiled, balloon-expandable cobalt-chrome stent to treat aortic CoA in infants, which is breakable to permit unrestricted growth. We hereby evaluated our initial clinical experience to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of this new nonlicensed device, which we have occasionally implanted in critically ill patients or when redo-surgery would entail an excessively high risk. MethodsRetrospective single-center analysis of all available data during and after treatment with a BabyStent implanted in infants with considerable re-CoA or reobstruction of the aortic arch after former surgery. All interventions took place under fluoroscopy and conscious sedation with local anesthesia or general anesthesia. ResultsFive BabyStents were implanted in four infants with technical success in all of themmedian age 10 weeks (range 5-21), median bodyweight 3.8 kg (range 2.7-4.5). Aortic diameters enlarged from median 2.25 mm (range 1.5-3.3) to median 5.3 mm (range 4.6-6.0). The follow-up period lasting up to 26 months (median 8.5, range 2-26) was uneventful concerning stent-related complications. ConclusionsBabyStent((R)) implantation for recoarctation was effective. However, our initial experience with the device is limited to short- and midterm follow-up only. None of the stents was subsequently overdilated with the intention to break due to our patients' limited somatic growth so far. A multicenter survey has been initiated to justify device approval. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Surgically placed radiopaque markers: Proof‐of‐concept of a novel technique to facilitate percutaneous interventions in neonates and infants
No full textNo-React (R) Injectable BioPulmonic (TM) valves re-evaluated: discouraging follow-up results
No full textOBJECTIVES: The No-React (R) Injectable BioPulmonic (TM) valve (BioIntegral) was introduced for minimally invasive off-pump replacement of the pulmonary valve almost 10 years ago. We present our mid-to long-term follow-up results. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all 7 patients treated at our institution at the median age of 9 (range 1-24) years. The children underwent cardiac catheterization when worsening strain on the right heart was suspected after examining their medical history and/or observing significant changes on echocardiography. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period lasting 5.2 (range 0.7-6.7) years, all patients presented the indication for recatheterization, particularly because the maximum instantaneous velocity measured by Doppler had revealed systolic gradients of a median 63 (dP 18-74) mmHg across the right ventricular outflow. Catheterization confirmed severe stenosis in 2, and moderate stenosis together with moderate insufficiency in 4 patients. We observed two principal failure mechanisms: technical problems resulting from poor alignment to the right ventricular outflow tract and structural problems leading to neointimal proliferation even in cases with appropriate prosthesis positioning. At median of 5.7 (0.7-7) years after implantation, 6 of the 7 patients underwent valve rereplacement. Redo surgery was necessary in 3, and percutaneous valve-in-valve implantation in the remaining 3 patients. Histological analysis of two explanted valves confirmed significant neointima proliferation and thickened valve cusps leading to stenosis of the graft. CONCLUSIONS: These mid-term results after implantation of the No-React (R) Injectable BioPulmonic (TM) valve are disappointing. Graft failure was mainly due to neointimal formation and valve malposition
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
