1,720,963 research outputs found
Putative predictors of efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer: facing the complexity of the immune system.
No full textIn non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the recent introduction of immunotherapy in daily clinical practice produced a wave of enthusiasm, however, this was rapidly moderated by the evidence that only some patients could experience a relevant clinical benefit. Therefore, a great effort from the scientific community has been dedicated to the identification and validation of reliable biomarkers able to drive the activity of immunotherapeutic agents. Areas covered: This analysis aims to review the main findings about predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in lung cancer, retracing the history of PD-L1 and focusing on a series of innovative candidates, such as mutational load, immune cell populations and microbiome. Expert commentary: Considering the complexity of the immune system-cancer interactions, the idea of identifying a single biomarker able to drive the activity of different immunotherapeutic agents alone, borrowing the idea of targeted therapy, is likely to represent an unrealistic objective. Nevertheless, the identification of those factors either positively or negatively affecting the response is mandatory in order to recruit the appropriate patients, but also to deeply understand the mechanisms of immune response and improve the clinical benefit deriving from these agents in monotherapy or in a biologically-rationale combination
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Breast Cancer Patient Treated with Everolimus and a Single Dose of Zoledronic Acid.
No full textThe first case of ONJ after the first infusion of zoledronic acid in a patient receiving everolimus and bisphosphonates for metastatic BC
Strategies for Increasing the Effectiveness of Aromatase Inhibitors in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: An Evidence-Based Review on Current Options
Full text linkNeoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NEO-HT) is a possible treatment option for breast cancer (BC) patient with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) disease. The absence of solid data on the type of drugs to be used and duration of treatment as well as lack of clear evidence of effectiveness of NEO-HT compared to chemotherapy (CT) reserve its use for patients with old age or frail conditions. However, the low pathologic complete response rate (pCR) obtained with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) alone does not make NEO-HT as a suitable option for the neoadjuvant treatment of HR+ HER2-. The use of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus and of the phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitor taselisib together with endocrine therapy (ET) has become a standard in advanced breast cancer, showing clinical effectiveness and significantly prolonging median progression-free survival compared to ET only. In the early phase disease, the use of ET together with CDK 4/6, mTOR and PI3K inhibitors is still investigational. Data from recent studies are promising even though less impressive than in metastatic setting. In this context, the use of genomic-transcriptomic tools (such as ONCOTYPE, PAM50) and the identification of novel biomarkers (ESR1, PI3Kca, PDGF-R) on tissue or with liquid biopsy could help to select patient prone to respond to endocrine-combined therapy and able to achieve pCR. With our review, we aimed at evaluating the current state of the art in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer with NEO-HT
Necitumumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical controversies
No full textOver the last decade, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling was investigated as a potential target for tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Necitumumab is a fully humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against the binding domain of EGFR, approved in combination with cisplatin-gemcitabine for the first-line treatment of squamous NSCLC. Areas covered: The purpose of this manuscript is to systematically review the state of the art of necitumumab for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC, focusing on predictive factors, cost-effectiveness, and future potential combinations with additional agents. Expert opinion: Despite recent therapeutic advances, platinum-based chemotherapy still represents the most widely used first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, particularly for the squamous histotype. Necitumumab is nowadays the first targeted agent providing an (statistically significant) additional survival gain to squamous NSCLC patients when combined with first-line chemotherapy at the cost of an increased (although manageable) toxicity, as shown in the SQUIRE trial. Hopefully, improvement in patients' selection by identifying reliable predictive markers and the combination with new agents may help to maximize the benefit of this targeted treatment, which is currently limited by a not optimal cost-benefit ratio
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Impact of time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer.
Full text linkBackground: Some studies of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) suggested that a shorter interval before the start of therapies may
improve survival outcomes in many groups of patients. Time to surgery (TTS) after neoadjuvant CT and survival outcomes have
not been established yet. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of TTS after neoadjuvant CT in terms of Overall Survival
(OS) and Disease Free Survival (DFS).
Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 295 patients receiving neoadjuvant CT for stage I-IIIc breast
cancer between 1991 and 2013. 56 pts underwent surgery within 21 days (group A) from last CT cycle, 148 pts within 22-35 days
(group B) and 91 pts after 36 days (group C). The majority were infiltrating ductal carcinoma, stage IIA (37.6%) and IIB
(33.9%), with nodal involvement in 51.6% of the cases. LumA 18.3%, LumB/HER2- 28.2%, LumB/Her2+ 20.7%, HER2+ 9.8%,
TNBC 21%. All patients were treated with neoadjuvant CT: 70.5% with anthra-taxanes based regimen, 18% with anthra- alone,
10.9% with taxanes alone, 0.3% with CMF; plus Trastuzumab in 70% of HER2+ diseases.
Results: After a median follow up of 4.6 years, it was observed that patients in group A showed a significant better OS than
group B (HR 4.22; 95% CI, 1.27 – 14.00, p=0.018) and group C (HR 3.61; 95% CI, 1.01 – 12.86, p=0.048). Moreover group A
showed a significant better DFS than group B (HR 3.41; 95% CI 1.34 to 8.65, p=0.010) and group C (HR 3.77; 95% CI 1.42 to
9.95, p=0.007).
No correlations with OS were found in pts who achieved pCR (20.7%); pCR was predictive of better 5- and 10-years DFS
independently from TTS (95.4% in the pCR-group vs 75.4% of non-pCR group, HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.66, p=0.011). TTS
may influence DFS in non-pCR group: indeed 5-years DFS is 97.3% in group A, 72.7% in group B (HR 2.89; 95% CI 1.14 to
7.36, p=0.026), and 68.5% in group C (HR 3.44; 95% CI 1.3 to 9.1, p=0.013). No significant correlations with regard of stage at
diagnosis or molecular subtypes were found.
Conclusions: These results suggest that TTS after primary CT may influence patients' survival, regardless of stage at diagnosis
and tumor subtype, so that a shorter interval between that last cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast surgery should be
addressed whenever possible
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
