104,919 research outputs found
Kurtze Anlaitung/ Wie man das Kindlich groß und Gottselige Geheimnus Von der Person/ Ampt/ und Gutthaten unsers allerliebsten Herrn und Heylands Jesu Christi ... betrachten soll
No full textKurtze Anlaitung/ Wie man das kündtlich Groß und Gottseelige Geheimnuß Von der Person/ Ampt/ und Gutthaten unsers allerliebsten Herren und Heylands Jesu Christi ... betrachten soll
No full textSymmetry characterization of unoccupied states in thick alkaline layers by spin-resolved Auger electron spectroscopy using primary excitation by circularly polarized light
No full textStoppmanns P, David R, Müller N, Heinzmann U, Grieb H, Noffke J. Symmetry characterization of unoccupied states in thick alkaline layers by spin-resolved Auger electron spectroscopy using primary excitation by circularly polarized light. Journal of physics: condensed matter. 1994;6(23):4225-4232.CVV Auger electrons emitted from K, Rb and Cs layers are studied using spin-resolved spectroscopy. Oriented 3p, 4p and 5p hole states are excited by circularly polarized radiation in normal incidence. The photon energies range from 12 to 24 eV. With all three materials, the degree and sign of the Auger electron spin polarization vary with the photon energy. As an atomic model of the Auger process predicts, and as a comparison of measurements with the calculated densities of states shows, the spin polarization is essentially determined by the symmetry of the final states reached in the primary (photo)excitation. Just above the excitation threshold, the preferential spin direction of the Auger electrons is measured to be parallel to the spin of the exciting photons corresponding to a predominantly s-like symmetry of the unoccupied final states reached by the excitation. At higher photon energies the preferential spin direction changes to be antiparallel to the photon spin, corresponding to the mainly d-like symmetry of unoccupied states reached by the excitation
Print of four Milwaukee Lieutenants, Swietlik, Grieb, Noyes, and Ott, in France, September, 1918
No full textPrint of four Milwaukee Lieutenants from an unknown publication.; The caption below the printed photo provides more information. Left to right; Lieutenant Francis X. Swietlik; Lieutenant Edward H. Grieb; Lieutenant Haskell Noyes; Lieutenant Harvey L. Ott; four Milwaukee Lieutenants; 330th Heavy Field Artillery; A.E. F.; Graduates of Fort Sheridan and Camp Custer; Somewhere in France; September 1918. From Francis X. Swietlik; Sr. family scrapbook; loaned to University Archives to be digitized
Print of four Milwaukee Lieutenants, Swietlik, Grieb, Noyes, and Ott, in France, September, 1918
No full textPrint of four Milwaukee Lieutenants from an unknown publication.; The caption below the printed photo provides more information. Left to right; Lieutenant Francis X. Swietlik; Lieutenant Edward H. Grieb; Lieutenant Haskell Noyes; Lieutenant Harvey L. Ott; four Milwaukee Lieutenants; 330th Heavy Field Artillery; A.E. F.; Graduates of Fort Sheridan and Camp Custer; Somewhere in France; September 1918. From Francis X. Swietlik; Sr. family scrapbook; loaned to University Archives to be digitized
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function
No full textThis thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author
- …
