1,720,974 research outputs found

    Afterword:on Mobled Power

    No full text

    Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds: The Social Effects of Climate Change as Internet Spectacle

    No full text
    This paper is part of my larger project to underscore the significance of critical theories of mass society for the environmental humanities. I offer a reading of James Balog’s Extreme Ice Survey (EIS), in particular the time-lapse films of glaciers receding, which I argue present a unique example of what Guy Debord calls the ”tautological” nature of spectacle, its capacity to serve as its own evidence at the same time as it becomes a mode of relation among people. My questions concern the political potential of the EIS. As the effect of the real created by time-lapse technology locates itself in the optimistic promise of Internet community, what kind of collective relation is produced? My key interlocutors are Timothy Morton, who claims that ecological thinking effects a loss of authentic world, and Jonathan Crary, who argues that late capitalism robs us of shared time, thus precluding the possibility of organized resistance. I argue that, despite the unprecedented challenges faced by the ”we” that Balog’s project calls to action, the form of sociality produced by the technologies on which the EIS relies has its own political potential

    "This is the only time to come together": June Jordan’s publics and the possibility of democracy

    No full text
    Introduction: "Olive and Us: Notes for an Empire of Barbarians" Margret Grebowicz and Valerie Kinloch Part I: Individual and National Identity in a (Not So) Democratic State Poem: "Case in Point" by June Jordan "This is the only time to come together": June Jordan's Publics and the Possibility of Democracy Nicky Marsh Exposing the Lie of Neutrality: June Jordan's Affirmative Acts Christina Accomando Narrating Nation: Exploring the Space of Americaness and the Place of African American Women through the Works of June Jordan Ramona Coleman Part II: Who Says It's Not a Language? Black English in Theory and Practice Poem: "What Would I Do White?" by June Jordan Black English as a Linguistic System: A Statement about Our Rights Valerie Kinloch Telling Her Own Truth: June Jordan, Standard English, and the Epistemology of Ignorance Nancy McHugh Notes Toward a Multicultural Writing Center: The Problems of Language in a Democratic State Ann E. Green Section III. Radicalizing Children's Lives and Literatures Poem: "One Minus One Minus One" by June Jordan "Affirmative Acts": Language, Childhood, and Power in June Jordan's Cross-Writing Richard Flynn Taking Children Seriously: June Jordan's Contribution to African American Children's Literature KaaVonia Hinton-Johnson Beyond "Orientation": On Sex, Poetry, and the Violability of Children Margret Grebowicz Section IV. The Art of Resistance, or Poetics Politicized Poem: "Calling on All Silent Minorities" by June Jordan Performing "Righteous Certainty": The Shifting Poetic Address of June Jordan's War Resistance Poetry Philip Metres June Jordan's Radical Pedagogy: Activist Poetry in Public Education Kirsten Bartholomew Ortega Finding a Democratic Speech: The Intercultural Poetics and Pedagogy of June Jordan's Poetry for the People Jonathan Stalling Section V: Writers Reflect Poem: "War and Memory" by June Jordan Writing War, Writing Memory Jane Creighton Words & Roses Rafael Jesús González June, with love Laura Flanders A Colored Democracy: "Cultural Exchange" Revisited Valerie Kinloch Directed by Desire Sara Mile

    Consensus, Dissensus, and Democracy: What is at Stake in Feminist Science Studies?

    Get PDF
    If feminists argue for the irreducibility of the social dimensions of science, then they ought to embrace the idea that feminist and non-feminist scientists are not in collaboration, but in fact defend different interests. Instead, however, contemporary feminist science studies literature argues that feminist research improves particular, existing scientific enterprises, both epistemically (truer claims) and politically (more democratic methodologies and applications). I argue that the concepts of empirical success and democracy at work in this literature from Longino (1994) and Harding (1996), to Longino (2002), Gilbert and Rader (2001), and Keller (2001) are not sufficiently critical, and fail to do justice to the truly revolutionary work done by feminist scientists. I offer the beginnings of an epistemology of dissensus (as opposed to consensus), using the work of Haraway (1978), Lyotard (1984), and Ziarek (2001). How would such an epistemology relate to feminist discussions of the possibility of democratic, responsible knowledge
    corecore